I'm not familiar with this process. Does that mean there were 22 people that voted? Or were the votes representative of a larger number?
Sadly, with only 22 members - no way they don't just fire them all - and move QA elsewhere.
Considering its the whole of Raven's QA and the COD bugs that happened because of the strikes they have a good place to stand firm.
My hope is that Microsoft allows them to continue with Heretic and Hexen. With idTech 7 or the current idTech at the time of development.While we're on the subject:
Microsoft, Please, #FreeRaven.
This developer doesn't deserve to be a support studio for CoD for the rest of eternity. They did their best work alone.
I'm sure they will.While we're on the subject:
Microsoft, Please, #FreeRaven.
This developer doesn't deserve to be a support studio for CoD for the rest of eternity. They did their best work alone.
Just assume they don't and you are probably right. haha. The US has pumped millions upon millions of dollars in the anti-union campaign for decades.Is there anywhere to see a list of which game studios (or even companies in general) have unions? I assume most European ones do but no idea about North America and Japan.
Main reason I ask is just personal interest.
The proto-union (ABK Workers Alliance) was created in August of 2021. There's no way this wasn't known considering how quickly the deal was put together.This apart of Microsoft's contract to buy Activision? Bet they were not looped in on this when they started talking.
This is the second union in the United States for a video game developer. The first for a major developer/publisher.
![]()
Activision Blizzard subsidiary wins union vote
Despite multiple concerted union-busting attempts.www.theverge.com
Just assume they don't and you are probably right. haha. The US has pumped millions upon millions of dollars in the anti-union campaign for decades.
However, it would be neat to see some sort of list.
They have a legal obligation to bargain in good faithGood to see this happen, but is the risk now that Activision says "thank you for your service, we'll do our testing elsewhere" in response to the unionization?
- Refuse to bargain over the effects of a change in the scope and direction of your enterprise, even though you need not bargain over the change itself because it concerns a matter at the core of your entrepreneurial control of your business. (Whether a proposed change is a non-bargainable "scope and direction" change or a mandatory subject of bargaining may present a difficult legal question. However, subcontracting that merely substitutes one group of workers for another to do the same work under similar conditions of employment is not a non-bargainable "scope and direction" change.)
Because the testers were the most mistreated group in Raven and so the testers proposed to organize their department.Happy for the cause, but if it is a small team...Activision will probably just move their QA to another company. 🤷🏻
Would also like to add...my celebrating is cut short...JUST a test team? Why would Raven not do the entire company? Just so I am clear, this "test" Team at Raven is the only "group" that will be part of a union while the rest of the company isn't? 🧐
While we're on the subject:
Microsoft, Please, #FreeRaven.
This developer doesn't deserve to be a support studio for CoD for the rest of eternity. They did their best work alone.
Shit on "support" all you want, it's not sexy from a consumer perspective sure, but from a business perspective, support and port studios have stability. Also, Raven isn't JUST a support studio. Warzone was a creative project, regardless of being tied to CoD and it was a massive success.
Also, if Infinity Ward finds success with Warzone 2, Raven may need the support work to carry on.
Kinda. They can't be specifically targeted, but if AB or MS happens to decide to, you know, close down all of Raven for completely unrelated reasons (cough cough), that would be A-OK.