Come for the sarcasm, stay for the particularly spicy speech at the end. Either way, it's time to consume our favorite videogame products! The past few months have been rough both in and out of gaming, and I've come to understand that my weekly dose of pessimism is Literally The Actual Problem. The time has come to compartmentalize, make excuses, and ignore the game industry's rot. It's not like we want to think about Ubisoft's abuse when it has a bevy of hot new products to sell us! Ubisoft doesn't want us to think of it either.
See you all in 20 minutes after we've had a chance to watch the full video before giving our opinions.
Based on the title alone and the recent thread with the poll about who is buying the "Ubi games Cyberpunk" this video is one that this god damned forum needs to hear and reflect upon.
I thought that thread about slaves being used on console production lines might cause people to think twice before buying a next gen console this fall. It got to about 12 pages before it fizzled out and the mods unpinned it.
People are happy to fight the good fight when they don't have to sacrifice anything. So sad that the bridge too far is video games.
Big ol' sarcasm. Threads for Jim's videos are filled with takes where it's obvious that the person didn't watch the video itself.
It's not just video games. Mass consumerism as a whole is like this. For good or for bad, the changes here don't seem to be motivated from the consumer side of things.I thought that thread about slaves being used on console production lines might cause people to think twice before buying a next gen console this fall. It got to about 12 pages before it fizzled out and the mods unpinned it.
People are happy to fight the good fight when they don't have to sacrifice anything. So sad that the bridge too far is video games.
I thought that thread about slaves being used on console production lines might cause people to think twice before buying a next gen console this fall. It got to about 12 pages before it fizzled out and the mods unpinned it.
People are happy to fight the good fight when they don't have to sacrifice anything. So sad that the bridge too far is video games.
It's all about context, and the context is, "I don't like calling video games art if that means I have to consider something." Art is about winning awards and your mum taking your hobby seriously. It's not about me having to think. For example, when there's discourse around a game I don't like, maybe involving politics that don't align with mine, or I'm asked to think about problematic implications, themes, or writing in the latest video game I decided to love a year before it was finished being made. I'm not going to think about anything that makes me feel uncomfortable, so instead I'm going to focus on how I don't like the word "problematic" and mock that whenever anyone says it. That will shield my favorite commercial product, and therefore me (somehow) from criticism.
Now that's a powerful message"when it's about (attacking) the companies, it's victimization, but when it's about us, it's just business"
I doubt change will ever come from consumers (until the atrocities and controversies actually starts affecting them and become too bad to ignore), and companies have money. Otherwise constant education and voting with your wallet is the best you can do at this time.I thought that thread about slaves being used on console production lines might cause people to think twice before buying a next gen console this fall. It got to about 12 pages before it fizzled out and the mods unpinned it.
People are happy to fight the good fight when they don't have to sacrifice anything. So sad that the bridge too far is video games.
This is a sadly true for me as well. I can "boycott" Ubi games just like I do THQ games but truth be told I dont bother much with the stuff they put out anyway so its easy for me. If this was Fromsoft or Capcom idk if I'd be able to go on any type of boycott that doesn't end up with me eventually getting the game because I think I've punished them enough.I thought that thread about slaves being used on console production lines might cause people to think twice before buying a next gen console this fall. It got to about 12 pages before it fizzled out and the mods unpinned it.
People are happy to fight the good fight when they don't have to sacrifice anything. So sad that the bridge too far is video games.
Is it? Generally speaking, boycotting of consumer goods on a large scale never happens. And we know a lot of them are mass produced in ethically dubious conditions. I'm starting to wonder if there are alternate methods of taking action because expecting consumers to...well, not consume, is not realistic for the most part.
Presuming that your default state is "consumer" is part of the problem. That's a label put on you by companies. It isn't what you are. You don't have to buy a PS5.
Good video. The industry is certainty giving him plenty of horrific material/practices to look at. I like that, in previous videos, Jim has referred to himself as a 'consumer rights show', but here also shines a light on what is effectively consumer entitlement, willingly putting on the blinkers that the industry wants you to have regarding the countdown to 'day 1'. It's easy to tear down the stuff you were never interested in anyway. But when something you like (or are hyped about) comes under fire? That's when a critical eye really starts to matter as suddenly you have to do what you've demanded of others and move past the reflexive response of 'but all the crap around the thing I like is fine'.
Consumer is nothing more than an economic term to categorize and separate customers and consumers. Individual people buying products and services are consumers. Companies that interact with other companies for products and services are customers. You have rights as a consumer. You have people who are advocates for consumer empowerment. This battle to relabel or reject the label of "consumer" isn't a worthwhile endeavor. We're consumers. It doesn't mean that we're giant, open mouths sucking everything into our mouths like Kirby. It's an economic term.Presuming that your default state is "consumer" is part of the problem. That's a label put on you by companies. It isn't what you are. You don't have to buy a PS5.
Unionization would help, but implementation is tricky. Are there software based unions?I mean, you know what consumerism is right? You can say that about most consumer goods outside of food and clothes, and even the fashion industry has a long history of labour exploitation. Which is my point - this speaks to a wider issue than videogames that needs to be tackled. Expecting people to not buy a PS5 or whatever it is due to ethical issues attached to the company behind it is unrealistic. We know from countless other examples in other industries that also produce consumer goods that seldom works at scale.
Not sure what the answer is, but this is a societal problem top to bottom which needs to addressed.
I thought that thread about slaves being used on console production lines might cause people to think twice before buying a next gen console this fall. It got to about 12 pages before it fizzled out and the mods unpinned it.
People are happy to fight the good fight when they don't have to sacrifice anything. So sad that the bridge too far is video games.
Top Shelf from Jim. Still my fave even if sometimes he is silly or flails when nothing's going on. No one else gives the industry the big Fuck You it deserves.
Social media has proven is that outrage and activism are effortless on a keyboard. You don't have to actually do anything, as long as the homies in the thread see you flip off Trump/Crunch/Sexism/Racism/INSERT HERE, you're good. You've filled your SOCIAL JUSTICE quota for the day.I thought that thread about slaves being used on console production lines might cause people to think twice before buying a next-gen console this fall. It got to about 12 pages before it fizzled out and the mods unpinned it.
People are happy to fight the good fight when they don't have to sacrifice anything. So sad that the bridge too far is video games.
Even when the topic is serious people love to shit that thread by making dumb posts because it was in the wrong forum, is not even funnyYup. This thread proves that some people are willing to dish out justice as long as it does not affect them.
Unionization would help, but implementation is tricky. Are there software based unions?
But I agree, the efficacy of boycotts for consumer goods Is dubious.
But it turns out that's not the way that boycotts usually work," he explained. "The typical boycott doesn't have much impact on sales revenue."
One reason is consumers' habitual nature. Even people who publically denounce a company might still purchase that company's products. Plus, the people boycotting a company might not be its target consumers.
"Think of PETA activists who are boycotting KFC," King explained. "That's a boycott that's not going to have much of an impact on sales revenue."
Nevertheless, boycotts can still be effective, according to King's research. He finds that while boycotts rarely hurt revenues, they can threaten a company's reputation, especially by generating negative media coverage.
"The no. 1 predictor of what makes a boycott effective is how much media attention it creates, not how many people sign onto a petition or how many consumers it mobilizes," he noted.
His research shows that the most successful boycotts are those that generate the most media coverage, typically to a single, high-profile company. These headline-grabbing boycotts lead to a greater fall in stock prices and are more likely to cause a company to change its behavior.
I feel this is more of a failure of people to give a shit. Boycotts could work (better) if more people made the decision to not buy (& stuck with it) and weren't all "oh well, it's not my problem, I must have this Nestle chocolate bar/Ubisoft game!"Unionization would help, but implementation is tricky. Are there software based unions?
But I agree, the efficacy of boycotts for consumer goods Is dubious.
But it turns out that's not the way that boycotts usually work," he explained. "The typical boycott doesn't have much impact on sales revenue."
One reason is consumers' habitual nature. Even people who publically denounce a company might still purchase that company's products. Plus, the people boycotting a company might not be its target consumers.
"Think of PETA activists who are boycotting KFC," King explained. "That's a boycott that's not going to have much of an impact on sales revenue."
Nevertheless, boycotts can still be effective, according to King's research. He finds that while boycotts rarely hurt revenues, they can threaten a company's reputation, especially by generating negative media coverage.
"The no. 1 predictor of what makes a boycott effective is how much media attention it creates, not how many people sign onto a petition or how many consumers it mobilizes," he noted.
His research shows that the most successful boycotts are those that generate the most media coverage, typically to a single, high-profile company. These headline-grabbing boycotts lead to a greater fall in stock prices and are more likely to cause a company to change its behavior.
It really says something when him talking with those tiny sausages in his mouth and him spitting said tiny sausages out aren't nearly as disturbing as hearing "triple A" said normally...Hearing Jim say triple A in a (relatively) normal voice is one of the more uncomfortable things I've felt in a while.
Cracking video though, albeit a particularly sobering one.
Seriously. He is going to personally oversee the overhaul? Really? The guy that enabled this shit to go on for years upon years? Nah.Really puts into perspective Yves Guillemot's colossal failure and/or being complicit in the abuse that went on for years.
Honestly, fuck Ubisoft.
much needed video especially after the discussions that have been happening in his past threads regarding tlou 2