It will look better. 90s Disney art aged terribly imo. All that faux-airbrushing etc.
It's like they forgot to actually use interesting compositions and color in their quest to make everything look really real real real.
It looks great but I really don't get how or why they keep trying to pass this off as "Live action."
It's full CGI, live action implies it's mostly real people/sets, etc. Just like the Jungle Book was 99% cgi this looks like it's going to be 100% CGI, so it's an animated movie, not live action.
The graphics looked insane though, can't wait to see how this turns out. Though part of me wishes, since they got James Earl Jones back, that they'd have gotten Jeremy Irons back for Scar.
Not defending this movie, and Simba ain't my kid. But Simba is my inner kid. The original movie and its establishment of Mufasa and Simba's father-son relationship hits me emotionally than anything else. My dad was superman for me. I didn't come from a broken home, had a father who was around when not working, all that jazz. It wasn't perfect, but he was still that rock in my life. The way Mufasa scolded him after the graveyard, then reassured Simba that he will always be around and then the play fight and he gives him a noogie, that was my relationship with my father. He is not dead, but he is sick and that rock in the sense of childhood idealism of what a father should be has died. I watch the movie because it reminds me of what once was. The way Mufasa asks his son to remember is how I feel when I need to muster courage to take care of my now frail and aging father. If this movie can recreate those emotions, than yea its worth defending. I won't care about window dressings, music, or anything else as long as it can captivate me the way the original has. And that is all that matters. If it doesn't even do that then yeah, its not worth defending.Some of y'all are defending this movie like Simba is your child lol
Yeah, it's not the only time they've done it either - the stage show for Aladdin at Disneyland made a new song for Jasmine out of the Genie's freedom leitmotif from the movie.I'm sure if the song is included, they will associate it's leitmotif accordingly.
Redundant as fuck.
This trend of remaking their classics but they're realistic nao!!1 is so annoying.
The original movie is timeless, it looks gorgeous, and the music won't be topped. The exact same can be applied to every other remake they've done.
So if they know the remake won't surpass or even come near the original, what is the point (aside from easy $$$$$) ? Where's the art style?
Obvious pandering to nostalgia, but not even done in a good way. I love nostalgia. This does it terribly. It's shot for shot but devoid of color and character. Yay? This is supposed to excite me how?
The way they churn these out on an assembly line really annoys me. Settle the fuck down Disney.
This looks like it has no soul, just like all the other remakes. They try to go shot for shot but also scrap entire important aspects of the originals. What the actual fuck.
This trend sucks, I hope it dies.
Hard to kill such a trend when they are making boatloads of money. This will be at least a billion dollar movie.