AhhBisto

Alt Account
Banned
Jun 30, 2023
779
UK
While I personally understand there being a support or people being against this acquisition. I do not understand how some people feel like it's ok to attack the FTC employees for doing their job. I am a bit disgusted after reading this article.

FTC Blasted By Congress And Gamers For Doing Its Job

People who do things like doxxing and death threats are obviously scumbags but the majority of comments I've seen have been fair in criticism even if a lot are jokey and full of memes, and it's kinda fascinating to see the gaming community of all places take an interest in bureaucracy like they have.

Also the core criticism here really is that the FTC are not doing their job properly, even before this Microsoft-ABK debacle, Lina Khan's tenure had been under fire.
 

OfficerRob

Member
Oct 25, 2017
26,168
While I personally understand there being a support or people being against this acquisition. I do not understand how some people feel like it's ok to attack the FTC employees for doing their job. I am a bit disgusted after reading this article.

FTC Blasted By Congress And Gamers For Doing Its Job
Fuck the congressional Republicans looking to score political points, but there is PLENTY to scrutinize the FTC for in this case. When the judge has to remind FTC lawyers that they are supposed to be looking out for consumers and not Sony, that's pretty fucking awful.
 

VibrantStorm

Member
May 11, 2021
740
Their job is to protect consumers, not Sony. They are not doing their job in this case. It's okay to criticise the head of the FTC for wasting tax payer dollars on a baseless suit.

It's okay to voice your opinion, we are footing the bill and they aren't doing their job at protecting consumers. Like at all. When the judge questions their motives you have a problem.
People who do things like doxxing and death threats are obviously scumbags but the majority of comments I've seen have been fair in criticism even if a lot are jokey and full of memes, and it's kinda fascinating to see the gaming community of all places take an interest in bureaucracy like they have.

Also the core criticism here really is that the FTC are not doing their job properly, even before this Microsoft-ABK debacle, Lina Khan's tenure had been under fire.

Fuck the congressional Republicans looking to score political points, but there is PLENTY to scrutinize the FTC for in this case. When the judge has to remind FTC lawyers that they are supposed to be looking our for consumers and not Sony, that's pretty fucking awful.

these are fair points. thanks for sharing your view on this
 

Revenge-FNF

Alt-Account
Banned
Jul 2, 2023
38
I might be wrong here but I think it doesn't lessen competition because the service will still exist but it won't belong to a provider that has direct control over the content, an advantage Sony also wouldn't have.

The service will still exist, but the consumer will pay more because it will pay for two services.

It will also lessen Competition, because a consumer that only wants to play in the Cloud, PS Plus will be cheaper. That also means that Sony might increase their price.
 

Axel Stone

Member
Jan 10, 2020
2,771
If i have read it right, the solution in the Uk is for Microsoft to sell the Cloud to a third party.

That means in all over the world, the consumer pays the Gamepass and can play in the cloud. In the Uk it will need to pay the gamepass and the Cloud to the third party.
How this does not harm the consumer in the Uk? How is this good for the consumer?

Also, the Market Leader will still have their cloud in PS Plus.

That means in the Uk, Sony can say their Cloud is cheaper than Microsoft. People only need to buy PS Plus and they can get their Cloud.
How this does not lessen Competition?

IANAL, but I would imagine that UK third party could be a B2B setup that only sells UK licenses to streaming services, so the company would just license ActiBlizz titles to Microsoft and others for inclusion in their services. I wouldn't have thought it would need to be a company that runs a separate consumer-facing service.
 
Jan 4, 2018
8,826

View: https://twitter.com/tomwarren/status/1679773925499183104


The CMA considers that there is insufficient time remaining in the statutory period for full and proper consideration of Microsoft's submission on the proposed Order. As such, the Inquiry Group considers that there are special reasons to extend by six weeks under section 41A(2) of the Act the period for the discharge of its duty under section 41(2) of the Act.
The revised period will therefore end on 29 August 2023. However, the Inquiry Group aims to discharge its duty as soon as possible and in advance of this date.
 
Last edited:

P30

Member
May 23, 2022
191

Pixis

Member
Oct 31, 2017
355
Can anyone explain what this means? Microsoft closing without CMA approval inbound?

The CMA have about 12 weeks from the date of their final report to make the final order. This would have been on 18 July but under statute the CMA can extend that period by 6 weeks to make the final order, which is what they've done here.
 

AhhBisto

Alt Account
Banned
Jun 30, 2023
779
UK
Can anyone explain what this means? Microsoft closing without CMA approval inbound?

It sounds like they have soft CMA approval to close as the CMA extending the deadline means Microsoft wouldn't fall foul of a final report going against them in that period I think? The last sentence in that statement shows that they are working on the resolution with Microsoft and aim to clear it up in advance of the 4 week extension.

The deadline was Tuesday, they've basically given themselves permission to come to an agreement on Wednesday.
 

Iggy1404

Member
Feb 12, 2020
111
The CMA have about 12 weeks from the date of their final report to make the final order. This would have been on 18 July but under statute the CMA can extend that period by 6 weeks to make the final order, which is what they've done here.

Seems to me this is the "CMA saving face" approach?

It sounds like they have soft CMA approval to close as the CMA extending the deadline means Microsoft wouldn't fall foul of a final report going against them in that period I think? The last sentence in that statement shows that they are working on the resolution with Microsoft and aim to clear it up in advance of the 4 week extension.

The deadline was Tuesday, they've basically given themselves permission to come to an agreement on Wednesday.

Thanks for chiming in! Hopefully, we'll receive some kind of confirmation that CMA allows them to close in the interim.
 

Pheonix Will

Member
Sep 6, 2021
1,353
I was wondering if the CMA needed more time - when you're in active negotiations they will be actively on the fly trying to assess market impact as they're going. Sometimes that's easy, other times it needs more effort especially if its some sort of deal that wasn't considered in phase 2.
 
Oct 27, 2017
2,677

its-never-gonna-end-josh-dallas.gif
 

Pixis

Member
Oct 31, 2017
355
It sounds like they have soft CMA approval to close as the CMA extending the deadline means Microsoft wouldn't fall foul of a final report going against them in that period I think? The last sentence in that statement shows that they are working on the resolution with Microsoft and aim to clear it up in advance of the 4 week extension.

The deadline was Tuesday, they've basically given themselves permission to come to an agreement on Wednesday.

That (the extension) is not soft approval to close because it means the interim order remains in place until at least the new extended date in August. Something has to happen with the IO for a soft approval.
 

LordRuyn

Member
Oct 29, 2017
3,914
That (the extension) is not soft approval to close because it means the interim order remains in place until at least the new extended date in August. Something has to happen with the IO for a soft approval.
That's what they likely mean by special reasons and resolving them ASAP. Seems like they've come to an agreement with MSFT and now they need to get that part taken care of.
 

AhhBisto

Alt Account
Banned
Jun 30, 2023
779
UK
That (the extension) is not soft approval to close because it means the interim order remains in place until at least the new extended date in August. Something has to happen with the IO for a soft approval.

I'm probably being rather glib with my language about a soft approval, it just sounds like the CMA are working with Microsoft to the point that they now wouldn't object to Microsoft closing while they work out their deal.
 

Pheonix Will

Member
Sep 6, 2021
1,353
I'm probably being rather glib with my language about a soft approval, it just sounds like the CMA are working with Microsoft to the point that they now wouldn't object to Microsoft closing while they work out their deal.

That would still open Microsoft up to fines. Their conclusion at the end could be no agreement which means everything was for nothing and CAT resumes.
 
Jan 4, 2018
8,826
From the notice

The CMA invited written representations on the proposed Order from any interested person or persons with a deadline of 17:00 UK time on 19 June 2023. The CMA received written representations on the proposed Order from interested persons which are currently under consideration. In particular, the CMA received a detailed and complex submission from Microsoft claiming that there are material changes in circumstance and special reasons under section 41(3) of the Act which mean that the CMA should not adopt the proposed Order.

Enterprise Act 2002

An Act to establish and provide for the functions of the Office of Fair Trading, the Competition Appeal Tribunal and the Competition Service; to make provision about mergers and market structures and conduct; to amend the constitution and functions of the Competition Commission; to create an...

The decision of the [F1CMA] under subsection (2) shall be consistent with its decisions as included in its report by virtue of section 35(3) or (as the case may be) 36(2) unless there has been a material change of circumstances since the preparation of the report or the [F1CMA] otherwise has a special reason for deciding differently.
 

Kopite

Member
Oct 28, 2017
6,139
Dunno if the CMA have some agreement, but I feel if they didn't they'd have put out another statement confirming MS couldn't close after FTC judgement and the developments since
 

LordRuyn

Member
Oct 29, 2017
3,914
From the notice



Enterprise Act 2002

An Act to establish and provide for the functions of the Office of Fair Trading, the Competition Appeal Tribunal and the Competition Service; to make provision about mergers and market structures and conduct; to amend the constitution and functions of the Competition Commission; to create an...
This proves what most of us have been saying, this isn't new and they have been in contact for a while. If they've been talking since at least June 19th, they've reached a deal and are just waiting for the TRO to run its course.
 

Big Boy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,956
Yeah that is not permission to close. It's still a positive for Microsoft though and makes a short extension wih Activision far more likely than closing ove rthe CMA
 

Psyrgery

Member
Nov 7, 2017
1,758
Does this mean that the CMA is stalling???

Having trouble trying to translate or make sense of their last statement
 

JadedGhost

Member
Jan 28, 2019
905
August 29th ABK could potentially close and then a few days later Starfield launches early access. That's a potentially busy week for xbox!
 

=[::::::::::>

Alt account
Banned
May 7, 2023
134
That (the extension) is not soft approval to close because it means the interim order remains in place until at least the new extended date in August. Something has to happen with the IO for a soft approval.
Appreciate this is very much unchartered territory and nothing can be said definitively but to your understanding does this mean MS cannot close by the 18th without facing repercussions (fines etc) by the CMA?
 

Fiksi

Member
Oct 27, 2017
878
I assume there's no reason to be concerned about any CMA updates at this stage, unless ABK or MS call them out.
 

Pixis

Member
Oct 31, 2017
355
Appreciate this is very much unchartered territory and nothing can be said definitively but to your understanding does this mean MS cannot close by the 18th without facing repercussions (fines etc) by the CMA?

Correct - effectively whilst the interim order is still in place, Microsoft can't close without repercussions from doing so.
 

Psyrgery

Member
Nov 7, 2017
1,758

cowboi

Member
Dec 31, 2021
249
Besides the interim order (which apparently is that prohibiting Microsoft from acquiring Activision assets and vice-versa, worldwide) this delay was apparently proposed by Microsoft and the CMA agreed to it?


View: https://twitter.com/MateoUribeRodr1/status/1679780832662155265?s=20


It says "Microsoft [is] claiming there are material changes in the circumstances", they didn't propose the delay, it's CMA that's delaying because there is insufficient time to consider this new development.

I still think if the TRO is not extended today, $MSFT will be closing the acquisition soon.
 

Pixis

Member
Oct 31, 2017
355
Besides the interim order (which apparently is that prohibiting Microsoft from acquiring Activision assets and vice-versa, worldwide) this delay was apparently proposed by Microsoft and the CMA agreed to it?


View: https://twitter.com/MateoUribeRodr1/status/1679780832662155265?s=20


The CMA are under a duty under the Enterprise Act to consider if there has been a material change of circumstances since their report (or if they have a special reason for acting differently). If Microsoft are proposing (which it seems like they are!) a deal restructure and such then that constitutes a material change of circumstances such that the CMA need to extend (given they won't have time, as they mention, to consider those changes before the current final order deadline). So it's a combination of Microsoft proposing potentially but more the CMA being somewhat bound to extend as a result.
 
Oct 29, 2017
811
Just my opinion but I'm skeptical that MS will close within the next few days . The CMA extension feels like good news for MS but will have to extend the ABK agreement a little over a month . I'll be curious what MS does coming up soon.
 

Iggy1404

Member
Feb 12, 2020
111
Just my opinion but I'm skeptical that MS will close within the next few days . The CMA extension feels like good news for MS but will have to extend the ABK agreement a little over a month . I'll be curious what MS does coming up soon.

I'd say it's reasonable to expect for MSFT and ATVI to agree to extend the contract until CMA's final decision. Without financial penalties of course.