Are they serious? F*ck off with your paid store exclusivity Epic! And any devs supporting them with this disgusting practice can f*ck off as well. This is NOT how I see healthy competition for pc gaming.
Well yeah, however, we don't know how Epic will handle this yet. And while they could very well do a poor job much like Steam, the article you grabbed those stats from earlier makes a very good point about this:I said that in previous post but, the thing is you don't really get exposure any more after there's tens or hundreds of games. So if they plan opening it to everyone, it will face exact same problem as Steam does.
The article goes into it more and I really recommend folks to read it to get an idea of what problems developers are having with Steam/Valve. But point is: yeah it's not sure if those smaller indie games would get much exposure on Epic's store. But that uncertainty is still potentially more promising for those developers than Steam where their games could very well not be seen at all if the algorithm deems it not worthy of being seen. (Also of course that bigger revenue cut is great and is something more stores should be doing cause developers getting as much as they can get from each sale is a good thing)Now, let's be honest here. Epic is not a threat to Steam... today.
I downloaded their client. It's ... fine. It's buggy, it's bare bones, and it's catching a lot of flak from customer groups for various reasons (refund policy & regional pricing among others). And even given Fortnite's huge player base, tons of those are kids playing on mobile who aren't old enough to have credit cards (it'd be great if Epic could give us clear breakdowns of their PC install base, and how many have ever spent money on anything).
But.
But but but.
A lot of developers don't care. They know that jumping ship or taking one of Epic's deals is a risk. But staying on Steam is a risk too, when the algorithm could decide without warning that all your marketing efforts (the very ones Valve told you that you should be doing) are now suddenly wrong and you deserve half as much money or less. Precisely because developers now feel that simply staying is a risk in itself, they are more willing to take other, bigger risks.
Even though Epic's launch can rightly be scrutinized, they're still the strongest offering so far, and buying your way to the top is a proven strategy. All who underestimate Epic's offering do so at their peril, and developers are jumping ship to them as we speak.
Steam launched in 2003. Epic Games Store launched two weeks ago.Well I believe in actual competition that benefits the consumer. That isn't going on here at all. The Epic launcher is inferior to Steam in every way imaginable and offers 0 benefits other than to developers.
Fuck yeahI get that the only place where to buy it "New" is from their store, but, wait, Epic is paying for the development of the rest of the season?
EDIT:
I guess that answers my question.
Steam launched in 2003. Epic Games Store launched two weeks ago.
It's normal to be critical of something, it's actually healthy to as that's how things grow and improve, but the way people are comparing Epic to Valve is laughable and not at all fair. Steam was dog shit for years before they improved. Now for some reason everyone seems to expect a Steam competitor to come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, but when it doesn't, they seemingly refuse to use it. Give them time.
Also, and I'm not sure if you know this, but if you got the season pass on Steam, you'll get the two packs on Steam. This Epic Games Store thing is just the stand-alone packs, and is most likely because Epic helped bring the team together to finish the game. So this outrage is nonsense and proves that people don't read past the headline.
It's normal to be critical of something, it's actually healthy to as that's how things grow and improve, but the way people are comparing Epic to Valve is laughable and not at all fair.
SweetNicole feel free to add this to my ever increasing list of posts that ruin PC discussion in this forum.Ok, so the developer is quoted as saying this. You have absolutely no proof or way to tell it's a lie. And nothing is going to change your mind, not even the people who are making the game. Sounds reasonable...lmao.
BTW, you said "Steam customers buying the season pass got this made." I think what you meant to say is "Steam customers NOT buying the season pass got our company shut down."
because they don't like competition, probably
they're mad that there's some serious competition for steam that's not 100% feature complete (since it's brand new) despite likely bringing forth positive change to the industry
you can't be seriousI think what you meant to say is "Steam customers NOT buying the season pass got our company shut down."
this shit is so bad
lol sure, it's exactly that pal
you can't be serious
because they don't like competition, probably
they're mad that there's some serious competition for steam that's not 100% feature complete (since it's brand new) despite likely bringing forth positive change to the industry
Did you guys know that the final season of the walking dead was ALREADY planned to be released on its announced platforms and had its development resumed?
I mean seriously how uninformed you can be of the situation? Its clear that epic moneyhatted them had those 'funds' were solely for exclusivity? if you want to take those words spoken by corporates on face-value then by my guest. Don't you think its fucking cheap for that company to moneyhat and make an previously planned episodic multiplatform game that has hundreds of preorders on more than one storefront/client on PC remove from those platforms and make it exclusive to yours? Do you know how fucking scummy that is? Now please don't give me that competition is not only for consumers but devs also BS.. at the end of the day its the consumers who buy their games. They can have all the cuts they want but if no one buys their product then its all over for their game regardless which not in full but in some similar shape will happen and thankfully this cancer will be put out some day.
That link doesn't really contradict anything though? What part am I missing here?
The only thing not mentioned is Epic Games and that'd be for obvious reasons since the store hadn't been announced and none of their partnerships were announced at all at that point.
Yup. And I don't like what Epic is doing at all. I've explained my opinion on this matter several times already in similar threads.
SweetNicole feel free to add this to my ever increasing list of posts that ruin PC discussion in this forum.
The Jimquisition is now an Epic store exclusive.So real talk when is Jim Sterling going to address Epic policy?
He seems to be such an advocate for the gaming consumer against sh**ty industry practices but he's been conspicuously silent on the topic.
So real talk when is Jim Sterling going to address Epic policy?
He seems to be such an advocate for the gaming consumer against sh**ty industry practices but he's been conspicuously silent on the topic.
This was all to drive my point that the development was already resumed for ALL platforms. and it didn't need any additional funding to release those games. you don't have any proof that they were the ones who helped rescue the PC version..or the PC version even need a rescue to begin with lol. I mean if that were the case there are other several versions of the TWD: Final season in development where did they have funds to develop that? PC was telitale's main platform some years ago and you're telling me even if they announced that all is fine and development is resuming, they somehow needed 'rescuing' for someone to fund their main version and that somehow epic had a big part in it? The only fact is here that the announcement came a month or two after the development started and iam sure they would have ample funds to atleast release the game in a a decent state, since in the past PC has always performed better than any other versions in a Telitale game.
Where are you getting the argument that it was specifically the PC version that needed saving? Not sure I follow.
'Telltale' btw and still, nothing in that article contradicts anything else. It literally says all the same stuff except it doesn't mention that Epic was there to help them put things together, which again would be for obvious reasons.
The company literally went under. Say what you want about the Epic Store and its strategy, but if they helped Telltale finish their game, then yeah, the strings attached are much more crucial than "if you want to launch on Epic, you need to pull from Steam".Must have gotten big sacks of money to come up with this boneheaded decision.
So... your problem is they didn't pay more and make these games exclusive to their store forever instead?If Epic saved the project: Why aren't they publishing it altogether ?
It's just so obvious that it's another case of a store moneyhatting for a game that the 3rd episode is releasing in... 3 weeks.
Not only that, they already HAVE a publisher with Skybound.
So... your problem is they didn't pay more and make these games exclusive to their store forever instead?
The Walking Dead is a huge multimedia property.The company literally went under. Say what you want about the Epic Store and its strategy, but if they helped Telltale finish their game, then yeah, the strings attached are much more crucial than "if you want to launch on Epic, you need to pull from Steam".
If Epic saved the project: Why aren't they publishing it altogether ?
It's just so obvious that it's another case of a store moneyhatting for a game that the 3rd episode is releasing in... 3 weeks.
Not only that, they already HAVE a publisher with Skybound.
Helping out doesn't necessitate that they'd be eating their lunch as well.
Another vaguely similar partnership where a company is helping out without publishing would Shenmue 3 with Sony helping fund that game but they aren't publishing.
I just don't think it's as outlandish of an idea as some of you guys but obviously I'm not trying to say any of this with any kind of authority, you could very well be correct on that part but since the wording on the announcement still sounds almost exactly the same.. in that they originally only announced that Season owners will get the rest of what was coming, I'll take them at their word because it seems reasonable that it is a possibility to me anyways.
Helping out doesn't necessitate that they'd be eating their lunch as well.
Another vaguely similar partnership where a company is helping out without publishing would Shenmue 3 with Sony helping fund that game but they aren't publishing.
I just don't think it's as outlandish of an idea as some of you guys but obviously I'm not trying to say any of this with any kind of authority, you could very well be correct on that part but since the wording on the announcement still sounds almost exactly the same.. in that they originally only announced that Season owners will get the rest of what was coming and didn't embellish on the rest, I'll take them at their word because it seems reasonable that it was worded that way for a reason and seems plausible to me anyways.
It does and I fucking hate it. /s is easy to read and works just as fine if not better.
Also I remember them confirming that the season will be finished some time ago. No mention of Epic until now. Though I guess this explains why the latest trailer didn't have Steam as one of the platforms.The Walking Dead is a huge multimedia property.
The founder of the publisher of this game is a multimillionaire.
They did not need money from Epic to make this game.
Where are you getting the argument that it was specifically the PC version that needed saving? Not sure I follow.
'Telltale' btw and still, nothing in that article contradicts anything else. It literally says all the same stuff except it doesn't mention that Epic was there to help them put things together, which again would be for obvious reasons.
Sony's involvement with Shenmue 3 was publicly stated the moment the game was announced.
Regardless of if they did or did not need Epic's money. Let's not whitewash the overnight closure of Telltale in order to fit a narrative of "Epic Store Bad".The Walking Dead is a huge multimedia property.
The founder of the publisher of this game is a multimillionaire.
They did not need money from Epic to make this game.
And in this case, Epic is involved in developers getting a guaranteed paycheck and marketing they otherwise wouldn't have gotten.Sony's involvement with Shenmue 3 was publicly stated the moment the game was announced.
Because they didn't just swoop in last minute with a bag of money in exchange for cancelling other planned versions of the game.
Because they were actually involved in making it happen.
I already pointed out in my previous posts that the part about Epic Games was the only part not mentioned, but that can be explained by the fact that their entire Store venture hadn't been announced yet.
I already pointed out in my previous posts that the part about Epic Games was the only part not mentioned, but that can be explained by the fact that their entire Store venture hadn't been announced yet.
Regardless of if they did or did not need Epic's money. Let's not whitewash the overnight closure of Telltale in order to fit a narrative of "Epic Store Bad".
The company literally went under. Say what you want about the Epic Store and its strategy, but if they helped Telltale finish their game, then yeah, the strings attached are much more crucial than "if you want to launch on Epic, you need to pull from Steam".
This is just PC gaming now. Time to accept it guys, from here on out it's moneyhat fiesta and its multitude walled gardens.
Like I didnt accept online paywall, I wont accept this shit.
People wont accept it either I think. Because a multitude of walled gardens will only lead to one thing: High piracy rates.