I know it's The Sun, and I apologise for that, but this is great. "Visibly shaken Corbyn"
The self-own of some people to think that a leader of Labour could do more damage to Britain (over a 5 year term) than ripping up a trade agreement with one of the largest trading blocks in the world.
The only radical thing in Corbyn's manifesto is getting rich people to pay tax ... never been tried in Britain and it's scaring the shit out of the wealthy.
the new labour pledge over women's pensions seems weirdly panicky and Hail Mary like. one of the core principles mcdonnell and his team have is that their manifesto's should always be fully costed to the penny as it makes ambitious radical plans seem normal and plausible and harder to position as pie in the sky. yet it's 58bn uncosted....
the new labour pledge over women's pensions seems weirdly panicky and Hail Mary like. one of the core principles mcdonnell and his team have is that their manifesto's should always be fully costed to the penny as it makes ambitious radical plans seem normal and plausible and harder to position as pie in the sky. yet it's 58bn uncosted....
It felt to me like a reaction to BoJo saying they wouldn't put it right, during the QT leadership debate.
They needed to lean more in to the economics of it anyway before, just saying "it's costed" doesn't help when the perception is you can't be trusted, you really need to go above and beyond to look trustworthy.the new labour pledge over women's pensions seems weirdly panicky and Hail Mary like. one of the core principles mcdonnell and his team have is that their manifesto's should always be fully costed to the penny as it makes ambitious radical plans seem normal and plausible and harder to position as pie in the sky. yet it's 58bn uncosted....
I think the impact of Brexit have been overstated if anything. There may be harder shocks in the short term but could be beneficial in the longer term.
So a big Tory majority. I'm not surprised, this is what happens when you stick with a deeply flawed leader (Corbyn). Doesn't matter how good your manifesto is, if people don't want to listen due to the messenger, then it's wasted. Corbyn's history meant the papers could easy paint him as a 70's Marxist, who was weak on defence and a terrorist sympathiser and this was always going to turn off a large portion of the population, no matter how bad the other guy (Boris) was. We get what we (collectively, as a country) deserve; a big Tory majority and a no deal Brexit. Time to get used to it and watch disaster unfold (then watch the right wing successfully blame the EU for it all).
He'll never allow Scotland to do another indyref. He made it quite clear that he wants Scotland in the UK.Worst thing to me if the Tories get a majority. BoJo hates Scotland so much but won't allow us an indy ref under his govt.
sucks
(I am trying to stay optimistic though that the Tories don't get said majority)
I think the impact of Brexit have been overstated if anything. There may be harder shocks in the short term but could be beneficial in the longer term.
I hope you're right because if you're going to self-inflict "small bumps in the road" then you need to see some major improvements just to make up for that loss. My concern is that large Corps and the wealthy etc will do very well out of it but how much of that will trickle down to ordinary households, all signs point to the rich getting richer.
He'll never allow Scotland to do another indyref. He made it quite clear that he wants Scotland in the UK.
"Paul Johnson from the IFS said:"If we are going to undo austerity to any extent, we are going to need more money for the health service," he says.
"At some point over the next decade we are going to have to raise taxes or accept we are going to have less in the way of public services...No party is taking that serious message to the electorate...In the Conservatives' case they are saying 'nobody needs to pay'"
Playing that Dominic Cummings clip was a surprisingly spicy move for Marr.
Until the election votes are in anything can happen. I am just saying how the UK is if there is a Tory majority. People can blame Corbyn all they want but the fact is Labour has only won a election when leaning more right. In the end you have to look at the common factor for the more right leaning party nearly always winning and that isn't Corbyn.
Like Trump in America, it has helped 'validate' their ideas meaning they can be a lot more open.A lot of people who identify strongly as Remainers have struggled with this. Even on here, people think that the referendum is the source of the current toxic atmosphere, despite minorities pointing this out for a long time.
I think the impact of Brexit have been overstated if anything. There may be harder shocks in the short term but could be beneficial in the longer term.
Top income tax bracket was 50pct only a decade ago, though the change to other personal tax policies are quite radical. Though his plan is just as radical on corporations as the U.K. is actually more efficient at taxing corporations as other EU nations so increasing the corporate tax rate AND giving employees/government a further 10pct of the equity would further increase the effective corporate tax rate to >30pct. This will definitely have an impact on corporates, and there are very serious questions/concerns around its implementation.
I suggest you read the recent FT article on Corbyn's tax plan, and there's a good memo prepared by Clifford Chance which discusses the IOF.
Corbyn's plan is very ambitious and unless he's got a majority to play with will
not be implementable within an election term (and not including the mountain of lawsuits which will ensue following nationalisation attempts).
They needed to lean more in to the economics of it anyway before, just saying "it's costed" doesn't help when the perception is you can't be trusted, you really need to go above and beyond to look trustworthy.
On Pienaar's politics this morning. Some political commentators felt Corbyn knew the election had probably gone and was now relaxed and going for it. And that conversations had gone on between Bailey and Angela Rayner about who would run for leadership. Though they did not provide any evidence to support what they were saying
compounding this is how in 2017 it was easy to imagine the viability of the big centrepieces like free tuition and nationalised trains and energy which most older voters have witnessed exist in britain in their lifetimes, whereas the policies this time seem more like a long dream wish list not a coherent blueprint. i like the four day working week but that especially seems like one where the practicality seems ridiculous to most voters and hasn't been explained at all.
I think it is a fair point. The next Labour election contest is going to be won by someone who sticks to his radical manifesto, otherwise they will be losing a lot of core support in Momentum etc. That is why I can't see them having any success in becoming centralist as there is too much left wing support among activists that they would expunge.
I hope Labour is comfortable remaining in opposition for the foreseeable future then. If Corbyn loses again the wrong thing to do would be to double down on his politics, in my opinion.
I hope Labour is comfortable remaining in opposition for the foreseeable future then. If Corbyn loses again the wrong thing to do would be to double down on his politics, in my opinion.
Don't you know that Labour caused a global economic crisis by spending too much on poor people?The Labour policies are very popular with polls.
The real problem is that they are Labour policies and for some reason people think that only the Torys are good at managing the economy.
Playing that Dominic Cummings clip was a surprisingly spicy move for Marr.
Don't you know that Labour caused a global economic crisis by spending too much on poor people?
compounding this is how in 2017 it was easy to imagine the viability of the big centrepieces like free tuition and nationalised trains and energy which most older voters have witnessed exist in britain in their lifetimes, whereas the policies this time seem more like a long dream wish list not a coherent blueprint. i like the four day working week but that especially seems like one where the practicality seems ridiculous to most voters and hasn't been explained at all.
Yes, and also because they let too many *insert minority* into the country, Its caused the land to sink in the sea and that's why places are getting flooded.
Also, here's everyone's favourite careerist cunt.
Saw this on twitter which brought me out of the slump this thread and the polls have caused yesterday.
That does seem to be true and things aren't exactly the same as last time but it does show what is technically possible and I need the hope of a hung parliament right now.I agree to some point except last time May pressed a big fucking red 'self destruct' button with her manifesto attacking her core voters
thatis not happening this time. The tories manifesto is as safe as possible.
Didnt the next Labor leader after Food choose a more centrist strategy
Can you be more clear about what kind of benefits can balance out more people dying, basic medecine shortages, the privatization of the NHS and more international companies leaving the UK?I think the impact of Brexit have been overstated if anything. There may be harder shocks in the short term but could be beneficial in the longer term.
To go back a few pages: that argument is lost on the 80k-100k bracket. An increase of 20% on fresh exotic fruits at Whole Foods is not going to hurt us as much as an increase of 10% on basic products at Aldi will hurt poor people.The pound will be fucked so everything you get from outside the UK will immediately be more expensive.
Has Corbyn got any more tv appearances as that Sturgeon line this morning about Trident is a huge banana skin Corbyn could be pinned over
Trident removal is a red line for the SNP.
Yeah she's going in for the kill around Corbyn as well. Presumably because she knows he's anti-nuclear but he's chained to the demands of his voting base.
This further drives the wedge that Scotland is moving in a different direction from England and we need out. If the SNP return 40+ seats it further emboldens this.
This is literally going to be a case of who blinks first though, as if SNP refuse to support because of these red lines, they actually help push a Tory Government into power... Which would mean they'd get neither of these, and well, Labour know they have that leverage as they are the only ones not entirely ruling it out (Indy2) and at least showing Trident needs to be looked at.
So don't support because of the red lines, if JC doesn't blink, you either have to support him, or accept you aren't getting them.
The mess that would ensue from a Labour minority Government where the SNP are constantly talking about how the UK won't respect the will of the Scottish people will only cause more unrest up here.
If a left-wing Government in England won't play ball then as I said it furthers the feeling that our two countries are incompatible.
Sturgeon is right about not waiting 2 or 3 years. I don't know why Corbyn just didn't take the position on Scotland that's its up to the people of Scotland.
I don't necessarily agree, but I feel like his position is "Give us a chance to show you how government in Westminster can be not shit, and if you still want out after a few years of us turning things around, fair enough."Sturgeon is right about not waiting 2 or 3 years. I don't know why Corbyn just didn't take the position on Scotland that's its up to the people of Scotland.
I don't necessarily agree, but I feel like his position is "Give us a chance to show you how government in Westminster can be not shit, and if you still want out after a few years of us turning things around, fair enough."
Of course, I don't disagree, but the choices are that, or a Tory government completely ignoring the Scottish, and having absolutely no legal recourse against it.