"The old white man who keeps saying, and has on several occasions done, racist shit has a better set of policies on race than anyone else" is pretty fucking inaccurate, actually.
"The old white man who keeps saying, and has on several occasions done, racist shit has a better set of policies on race than anyone else" is pretty fucking inaccurate, actually.
Soooo, McConnell just has to hold out till next month. Too little, too late Flake.
Bernie is very popular among young minorities because he speaks to both class and race issues. He's made tone deaf comments, but its still better than most white politicians, including Hillary. Also correct me if im wrong but hes had high approval from the Naacp for the majority of his career. Also given how hes ahead of the curve on yemen and now palestine he'd actually be good for minorities internationally. Stop the bombs yo.Bernie is to the right of the party median on social issues overall. Thats a legitimate issue.
That is my point, his messaging isnt there, but his policies are. That is what matters to me.
"The old white man who keeps saying, and has on several occasions done, racist shit has a better set of policies on race than anyone else" is pretty fucking inaccurate, actually.
I actually think this is a good point. Reagan describing protectionism as a "cheap and hollow form of nationalism", was pretty spot on. Pot kettle black etc, but it's true. It was a good way for democrats to get a lot of congressional rural power in the 80s. It was being nationalist without really doing it.
What are his policies on race that are notably different and better than his other progressive challengers
Reagan/Bush are far to the left of today's GOP on Immigration/Trade.Interesting that you quote Reagan to bolster your point. Regardless of the semantics, trade unions and their issues are considered left-wing and what is maligned as "protectionism" is actually keeping wages livable.
Lansing — Senate Republicans are advancing a controversial plan that would strip incoming Democratic Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson of the power to enforce the state's campaign finance laws.
The Senate Elections Committee on Wednesday approved legislation that would instead shift campaign finance oversight to a bipartisan committee. The six members would be picked from a list submitted by each of the two major political parties.
The legislation is among a slew of lame-duck power play proposals by legislative Republicans, who will retain their majorities next year in the House and Senate as Democrats take over top statewide offices, including the secretary of state post that has been occupied by a Republican the past 24 years.
Reagan/Bush are far to the left of today's GOP on Immigration/Trade.
Protectionism isn't about livable wages, it's about trying to avoid competition from external industries in other countries to maintain your competitive advantage artificially.
Alot of his policies have been adopted by others which is good, hes still ahead of the curve on issues like saudi arabia and the war in yemen.What are his policies on race that are notably different and better than his other progressive challengers
Also that murphy shit is gross
Bernie is very popular among young minorities because he speaks to both class and race issues. He's made tone deaf comments, but its still better than most white politicians, including Hillary. Also correct me if im wrong but hes had high approval from the Naacp for the majority of his career. Also given how hes ahead of the curve on yemen and now palestine he'd actually be good for minorities internationally. Stop the bombs yo.
You sort of have to go back to get a lot of pro free trade quotes because everyone runs against it now. Obama ran against it for both his elections and then tried to push through the TPP in the lame duck.Interesting that you quote Reagan to bolster your point. Regardless of the semantics, trade unions and their issues are considered left-wing and what is maligned as "protectionism" is actually keeping wages livable.
Luckily, a lot of the stuff (e.g., weed) requires 2/3 or 3/4 vote and will go nowhere.
? Are you saying minorities dont know better come on son, isnt that a criticism of Bernie supporters.I'm going with a they didnt either know any better or the issue with wages overwhelming the racial element.
You sort of have to go back to get a lot of pro free trade quotes because everyone runs against it now. Obama ran against it for both his elections and then tried to push through the TPP in the lame duck.
But they didn't really put the facts out there (for a very long time at least) because Obama knew people are dumb when it comes to trade, but the process of sort of just going through it without getting into the details and actually making strong arguments of why it would have been a good deal made it seem sketchy, and even people who were on here (or the old place I guess) happy that Trump canceled it after he won... Hillary had to disown a deal she called the gold standards. We are getting in to really stupid territory here.
I think racial issues is legitimately something to debate that feels more like a Rorschach test to one's own feelings towards Bernie that I have no desire to litigate because I don't hate myself that much. But, immigration? To the right of my your average Dem? That's... not right and feels like projection of beliefs than actual substantial policy goals of Sanders.
The Democrats and Republicans were much more ideologically mixed prior to the '90s, when the slow Dixiecrat bleed that was occurring during Reagan accellerated into overdrive in '94. Reagan's amnesty is impossible under the modern GOP because of the nationalized southern strategy realigning the parties. This resulted in a number of things over the course of Nixon/Reagan/HW Bush that don't cleanly fit into a trraditional left/right-wing axis because they're hitting different parts of sociail/economic policy combinations.That's beside the point - look at who was pro and anti NAFTA in the 80s for a clue how this issue is traditionally perceived. You can call being trade-cautious "right-wing" all you like, or reframe it as a social issue - it has been a left wing issue in the past.
I was referring to how Reagan was using the term "protectionism" in that specific instance.
When someone keeps saying racist shit, to believe they have issues with actually believing the shit that comes out of their mouth isn't "projection", it's acknowledging reality.I think racial issues is legitimately something to debate that feels more like a Rorschach test to one's own feelings towards Bernie that I have no desire to litigate because I don't hate myself that much. But, immigration? To the right of my your average Dem? That's... not right and feels like projection of beliefs than actual substantial policy goals of Sanders.
Kind of feel like you're reaching here instead of pointing out economic issues you disagree with Bernie on.
I totally get why people don't support it. Or disagree with me, which is totally fine. It's hard to expect voters to want something the politicians are afraid to talk about or endorse. John Kasich was the only person I think on either side in the last primary to actually make decent pro trade arguments.You've certainly touched on why a lot of people on the left had a problem with both Obama and Hillary, regardless of your views on trade.
Bernie Sanders on Immigration:
You sort of have to go back to get a lot of pro free trade quotes because everyone runs against it now. Obama ran against it for both his elections and then tried to push through the TPP in the lame duck.
Gels nicely with that Voter Study graph and the two axes of politics.great deal of them to non-white American workers for a long time. Even though Unions are left wing, this aspect of them isn't left wing behavior.
In the same way that bronchitis is an improvement over TB.Look, I'm not a complete partisan: I think Ted Cruz's beard is an improvement
The part where you admitted to not understanding the issue certainly seems accurate.
I don't really see Bernie being to the right overall of the party on immigration either.I think racial issues is legitimately something to debate that feels more like a Rorschach test to one's own feelings towards Bernie that I have no desire to litigate because I don't hate myself that much. But, immigration? To the right of my your average Dem? That's... not right and feels like projection of beliefs than actual substantial policy goals of Sanders.
Kind of feel like you're reaching here instead of pointing out economic issues you disagree with Bernie on.
THISSo we've gone from re-litigating 2016 Bernie vs. Hillary to pre-litigating 2020 Bernie vs. Beto
Someone shoot me in the fucking face
Agreed.You know as much as I hate Cruz, I think this look suits him. It actually frames his face and gives it shape instead of looking like hes gonna turn into a puddle at any moment.
Yeah, I mean, I'm not Bernie's Biggest Fan, but he seems fairly middle of the road on immigration.I don't really see Bernie being to the right overall of the party on immigration either.
The party "overall", isn't great on immigration despite the narrative from the right that every dem supports open boarders. Bernie is middle of the pack really as far as I can tell.