I have learned that whenever Republicans are caught flat footed and trying to go on the offense (because they are never allowed to admit they are wrong) they clutch pearls on something stupid to try and change the dialogue. It works most times just based on repetition.
I still think the email nonsense with Hillary was them clutching pearls after they realized Benghazi wasn't going to lead to anything.
I'ma reply both at once. I just think no one really cared about this particular hearing enough to be too worried abou tturning off some potential votes. If this was enough to swing your thought process, we were never winning you anyway. (Be that a rep or a voter). I definitely agree optics matter, and everything officially related to the impeachment has to be perfect. This, though, eh. I'm not real worried about it. I thought overall Schiff ran a good hearing. I feel pretty confident with him taking point on some of this. The fact that he wasn't a die hard impeacher is good, imo, because it fits the narrative that Pelosi is wanting to run on:That defense on matters for optics. It doesn't really change the evidence or anything like that . . . but some fence-sitting republicans/independants might be a little harder to pull over now.
Of course, this shouldn't actually matter on iota in his impeachment inquiry / vote. There's just too much going on in his closet to let some paraphrasing derail this investigation.
We hate having to do this. We didn't want to do this. We had literally no choice. It's to save the Republic.
(that's the winning message imo)