People in this thread recognise that EGS regional prices is in more countries than Steam but it's a nuanced discussion because in a lot of the countries they are both in Steam had cheaper prices.
The title of the article is not accurate. If the author had done more research and shown how it is for different countries around the world on each storefront and fixed the headline I think there would be a different reaction in this thread. An article like that would be interesting. I mean let's not forget that if Valve didn't push for regional pricing on their store we wouldn't have seen it on the EGS (imo).
The EGS didn't even launch with regional pricing in most regions until we asked for it. Which is a pretty telling thing when you consider the head of the store is Ukrainian (so he knows that it's an important thing, and now brags about its implementation, etc) and that he'd talked about how important regional pricing is back when he didn't work for Epic (early SteamSpy days).
I've discussed my issue with the article here before. There's a lot of context that's missing. Another thing that bothers me is that only now people talk about regional pricing, but before it was an evil thing Valve did (remember the "forced discounts" claim Polygon published? I do). I'm all for better regional pricing all over the world. I live in a "developing country" and we have been able to buy lots of stuff we'd have otherwise missed out on thanks to Valve working on that.
But hey, I remember that lots of people in this forum thought it was OK to brag about buying stuff from our regional eShop without caring that Nintendo (or the publishers who do set good regional pricing here) might take issue with it and decide to just give us 1:1 US prices (like most big publishers are doing now everywhere). Seems like it's only important when it helps someone make their point in a discussion, but not when it actually affects people, right?