• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

SilentEagle

Member
Jan 9, 2021
5,786
I don't think majority of key talent still at Blizzard from prime era. Blizzard North got closed. Morhaime, Pardo, Didier, Kaplan left Blizzard.

They still have talented devs like Metzen, Cheng, Chilton but Blizzard needs to abandon their monetization policy. They need to focus on PC rather than mobile and even console. Well as a console main player for my life I think some games become more casual for console audience lately. Old Blizzard titles were focused on PC and then ported to consoles. Diablo is great example. Compared to first two games Diablo IV looks like basic MMO.
 

lairo

Member
May 28, 2020
469
This might be the first time we've wanted an acquisition to be extremely hands on, and change as much as possible. Blizzard today should absolutely not just be Blizzard.
 

Anoregon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,081
I don't think majority of key talent still at Blizzard from prime era. Blizzard North got closed. Morhaime, Pardo, Didier, Kaplan left Blizzard.

They still have talented devs like Metzen, Cheng, Chilton but Blizzard needs to abandon their monetization policy. They need to focus on PC rather than mobile and even console. Well as a console main player for my life I think some games become more casual for console audience lately. Old Blizzard titles were focused on PC and then ported to consoles. Diablo is great example. Compared to first two games Diablo IV looks like basic MMO.

I wonder what the Diablo franchise would look like if things turned out differently with Blizzard North/Condor. David Brevik ended up making another absolute banger ARPG (RIP Marvel Heroes, it started rough and had a pitiful end, but its peak was amazing). Diablo 3 certainly would have been a different and probably better game at the very least.

Or not. With Activision and everything else going on, it's hard to imagine any single change in a vacuum.
 

Finaj

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,365
This might be the first time we've wanted an acquisition to be extremely hands on, and change as much as possible. Blizzard today should absolutely not just be Blizzard.

WoW is in a fantastic state, Diablo is making great strides in season 4 and the Overwatch team just made a lot of really positive monetization changes. What team/game do you think needs a more hands-on approach from MS?
 

Pixelpusher

Member
Mar 25, 2022
124
This means nothing. It hasn't been that long yet. Everything is fine till profits are taking a hit, and the finance teams start looking at the waste. In any acquisition they are looking to avoid attrition, unless they want to force it. Time will tell, but history isnt in their favor lol.
 

David Matter

Member
Apr 16, 2024
117
i love blizzard and i love xbox, but i dont know if this will be forever true, big entities arent friends of anyone when profits are at stake
 

Bengraven

Powered by Friendship™
Member
Oct 26, 2017
26,934
Florida
Old Blizzard, outside of people like Metzen, is long gone and yes, they were the ones who created the things we loved. But as someone said above: we shouldn't let Blizzard be Blizzard TOO much.

What exists is a team that is trying to replicate their successes, within their IPs, without being as toxic or destructive as well as creating new IPs with the same list of Blizzard core values (yes, there's a list) created near the beginning of the company's founding. They're hiring people who are comfortable in these worlds and can expand on these worlds. Yes, it might feel different because the people who created the tone are gone for the most part, and that's the most difficult thing to have to accept. "The chuds are gone however the chuds were creative and made something I liked" is something we just have to accept is better as it is now than it was then.

Blizzard is much more than a small group of mostly white guys from the 90s. They created a standard and a vision that now a diverse group of hundreds of people are representing.

At this point, Microsoft just needs to makes sure they are allowed a comfortable and safe environment and that's literally it. Pay the bills, give them benefits, don't lay off people for fuck's sake, and let Blizzard be Blizzard CREATIVELY and they're gonna be happy with their investment.
 

Tommy Showbiz

Member
Jul 20, 2022
1,880
Some very baffling responses in this thread.

For one there have been significant leadership changes across almost every single Blizzard team since the lawsuit, so this idea that people just did absolutely nothing in the wake of the lawsuit is pretty false. Not only that, but most Blizzard games are widely considered by their communities to be on the mend in recent months, WoW especially. By every account from people I know who play WoW, the game is in one of it's strongest states since 2011.

I think the idea that Blizzard has no talented people left, especially at a company that employs as many people as they currently do, is categorically ridiculous. Most of the recent decisions that have infuriated people that aren't directly related to the lawsuit are the result of Activision C-Suite taking a more active heavy-handed approach.
 
Last edited:

Anoregon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,081
Some very baffling responses in this thread.

For one there have been significant leadership changes across almost every single Blizzard team since the lawsuit, so this idea that people just did absolutely nothing in the wake of the lawsuit is pretty false. Not only that, but most Blizzard games are widely considered by their communities to be on the mend in recent months, WoW especially.

I think the idea that Blizzard has no talented people left, especially at a company that employees as many people as they currently do, is categorically ridiculous. Most of the recent decisions that have infuriated people that aren't directly related to the lawsuit are the result of Activision C-Suite taking a more active heavy-handed approach.

I can't really begrudge anyone for just swearing off Blizzard entirely in the fallout of everything that came to light over the past few years, given the nature and severity of it all. But I do agree that it's unfortunate that is sort of where a lot of folks interest on the topic begins and ends, since there have clearly been positive changes both in terms of personnel and overarching company policies in the last year or so. It is sadly ironic (although understandable) that a thread about an interview with someone who is like, the poster child for a positive new direction for Blizzard, is still heavily weighed down by things the company did before she was a part of it. And that's to say nothing of the "all the good devs are gone" narrative.
 

Tommy Showbiz

Member
Jul 20, 2022
1,880
I can't really begrudge anyone for just swearing off Blizzard entirely in the fallout of everything that came to light over the past few years, given the nature and severity of it all. But I do agree that it's unfortunate that is sort of where a lot of folks interest on the topic begins and ends, since there have clearly been positive changes both in terms of personnel and overarching company policies in the last year or so. It is sadly ironic (although understandable) that a thread about an interview with someone who is like, the poster child for a positive new direction for Blizzard, is still heavily weighed down by things the company did before she was a part of it. And that's to say nothing of the "all the good devs are gone" narrative.

Yeah, I get it completely if people just don't want anything to do with Blizzard ever again after everything that went down. I just wish people would be a bit more forthcoming that this was the case instead of trying to posture that the thing they actually want is for Blizzard's employees to be under total lock and key by management again.

I guarantee you not a single person working at Blizzard, y'know the people who were historically the victims in all this, are actually wanting a return to that.
 

Check it out

Member
Oct 25, 2017
455
Microsoft replaced Ybarra and is allowing and trusting new leadership to ensure that things are running properly.

This is how it should be. Put good people at the top of publishers and studios and trust that they can handle it and if they can't, trust that they will reach out for help.

The idea of Blizzard getting to pretend like the parents are gone and they are throwing a party is insane.
 

SilentEagle

Member
Jan 9, 2021
5,786
Some very baffling responses in this thread.

For one there have been significant leadership changes across almost every single Blizzard team since the lawsuit, so this idea that people just did absolutely nothing in the wake of the lawsuit is pretty false. Not only that, but most Blizzard games are widely considered by their communities to be on the mend in recent months, WoW especially. By every account from people I know who play WoW, the game is in one of it's strongest states since 2011.

I think the idea that Blizzard has no talented people left, especially at a company that employs as many people as they currently do, is categorically ridiculous. Most of the recent decisions that have infuriated people that aren't directly related to the lawsuit are the result of Activision C-Suite taking a more active heavy-handed approach.
I really wonder what happened to Blizzard. They released all-time great games back in 90s and early 2000s when they were just a small studio with bunch of young people.

They are much bigger studio now. And I am sure that they have talented folks in there. But why they can't release iconic games they used to?
 

vixolus

Prophet of Truth
Member
Sep 22, 2020
55,166
I really wonder what happened to Blizzard. They released all-time great games back in 90s and early 2000s when they were just a small studio with bunch of young people.

They are much bigger studio now. And I am sure that they have talented folks in there. But why they can't release iconic games they used to?
Because Activision/Kotick took control in the late 2000s and has slowly but surely took power. I imagine Schreiers book will go into detail about it all.

Who knows how things will end up over the next ten to twenty years now though.
 

davepoobond

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,680
www.squackle.com
Because Activision/Kotick took control in the late 2000s and has slowly but surely took power. I imagine Schreiers book will go into detail about it all.

Who knows how things will end up over the next ten to twenty years now though.

everyone likes to blame Activision, but the issues were cropping up before. i'm not convinced of Kotick being the bogeyman as far as Blizzard is concerned
 

Tbm24

Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,352
I really wonder what happened to Blizzard. They released all-time great games back in 90s and early 2000s when they were just a small studio with bunch of young people.

They are much bigger studio now. And I am sure that they have talented folks in there. But why they can't release iconic games they used to?
Depends on what you're looking for. OW was their last new game and it certainly was iconic. What's extra funny about OW is the game and its future was entirely fumbled by the old guard of Blizzard stuck in their ways trying to work towards something they already failed at once.

The reality is releasing a good game is hard enough. Following up on it with more is even harder.

As an OW fan I can't be more thankful the team has pivoted entirely away from where it was going because I get to play a game now instead of talking about how great their idea that they just cannot finish and release could have been.

Odyssey is on that list now too.

Not to say there wasn't other things that contributed, but I will always be upset they almost nuked the game chasing after Titan again.
 
Last edited:

SilentEagle

Member
Jan 9, 2021
5,786
Depends on what you're looking for. OW was their last new game and it certainly was iconic. What's extra funny about OW is the game and its future was entirely fumbled by the old guard of Blizzard stuck in their ways trying to work towards something they already failed at once.

The reality is releasing a good game is hard enough. Following up on it with more is even harder.

As an OW can I can't be more thankful the team has pivoted entirely away from where it was going because I get to play a game now instead of talking about how great their idea that they just cannot finish and release could have been.

Odyssey is on that list now too.

Not to say there wasn't other things that contributed, but I will always be upset they almost nuked the game chasing after Titan again.
As someone who really liked Overwatch back in 2016/2017, I find it pretty overrated. But I can't deny its success. Winning GOTY + 50 million sales is insane for multiplayer only game.

Excluding Heartstone which is my favorite Blizzard game in last 10 years, I don't remember when I really enjoyed from Blizzard game. I was really hyped for Diablo IV but it's one of my biggest disappointments in 2023. Even small indie studios can make better ARPGs then Blizzard now. WoW is better state than what it used to be in 4-5 years ago but still far from older glory.

Blizzard really needs to abandon mobile focus and their monetization policy. Blizzard was PC studio at and they should focus on PC. I don't want casual games from them.
 

Anoregon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,081
Blizzard really needs to abandon mobile focus and their monetization policy. Blizzard was PC studio at and they should focus on PC. I don't want casual games from them.

it feels pretty premature to say that they are focusing on mobile over PC. They have what... 2 mobile games? 3 if you count hearthstone? The tentpole franchises are still firmly PC/console-centric.
 

Shoichi

Member
Jan 10, 2018
10,471
I don't want Microsoft to touch WoW at all. Right now the narrative looks like its finally heading back in the right direction again. Especially with Metzen helping construct it.

If anything, I hope Blizzard gets at least nudged to make a new Warcraft or Starcraft again. Instead of just sticking to Diablo, WoW, Hearthstone and Overwatch.
 

00Quan[T]

Banned
May 12, 2022
2,990
Eh... I feel like they should get more involved in general with their studios.
Some fly just fine alone, but others clearly struggle hard.
 

SilentEagle

Member
Jan 9, 2021
5,786
it feels pretty premature to say that they are focusing on mobile over PC. They have what... 2 mobile games? 3 if you count hearthstone? The tentpole franchises are still firmly PC/console-centric.
Diablo IV feels like Diablo Immortal with fancy visuals for me. UI and skill tree feels like mobile game. Meanwhile Path of Exile is much deeper game. Closer to Diablo II.
 

jschreier

Press Sneak Fuck
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
1,099
I really wonder what happened to Blizzard. They released all-time great games back in 90s and early 2000s when they were just a small studio with bunch of young people.

They are much bigger studio now. And I am sure that they have talented folks in there. But why they can't release iconic games they used to?
October 8!
 

JhOnNY_HD

Member
Dec 13, 2020
834
Diablo 4 is pure meme fuel

The super comeback of season 4 is the feedback of the comunity since de first open beta a year ago....
 

Cort

Member
Nov 4, 2017
4,362
everyone likes to blame Activision, but the issues were cropping up before. i'm not convinced of Kotick being the bogeyman as far as Blizzard is concerned

Agreed. It seems like Activision's involvement has been mostly about controlling their budget. And it's hard not to blame them when the community is aware of like 8 projects that Blizzard has canned in that timeframe. Who knows what other projects they began cooking before getting canned.
 

JasperMyst

Powered by Friendship™
Member
Sep 25, 2023
337
That doesn't really sound reassuring given the company's incompetence as of late.
 
Oct 25, 2017
12,638
I really wonder what happened to Blizzard. They released all-time great games back in 90s and early 2000s when they were just a small studio with bunch of young people.

They are much bigger studio now. And I am sure that they have talented folks in there. But why they can't release iconic games they used to?

OW came out how many years ago? And we're still calling the new marvel game, Marvelwatch. Blizzard also led the DCG trend and many many games have challenged and failed to meet Hearthstone. They don't release iconic games anymore? That's false imo.
 

thediamondage

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,345
If it wasn't for gamepass i would not be touching any Microsoft game other than Forza Horizon.

Activision means almost nothing to me other than annual call of duty.

I can't even really think of the last Blizzard game I played, maybe overwatch 1 at launch which is almost 8 years ago now?

So yeah, not exactly three leaders in the gaming space, at least for me. I hope they can get it together but statements like this just make me feel like there is no real vision or direction happening still at xbox, which is disappointing.

It is pretty funny though that I enjoyed Fallout tv show... brought to you by Amazon lol. I guess if nothing else Microsoft can get into the hot new licensing video games into movie/TV shows biz. One miss with Halo, but one hit with Fallout. Time for Call of Duty the movie.
 

SilentEagle

Member
Jan 9, 2021
5,786
Funny considering there is 0 depth in D2. Something having a convoluted UX does not equal to it having depth.
I don't agree with the former. Meanwhile it wasn't as complicated as PoE (which is not a bad thing because I don't like the games to become full time job) it has the most complex mechanics among Diablo games. Especially itemization of Diablo II is still gold standard for ARPGs. I really dislike the UI because it looks like mobile game. But at the same time I think they are on the right track with Season 4 changes but the game still needs lots of improvement.

Well I do really want Blizzard to make Diablo IV better experience because I loved the art direction.
 

JahIthBer

Member
Jan 27, 2018
10,396
I really wonder what happened to Blizzard. They released all-time great games back in 90s and early 2000s when they were just a small studio with bunch of young people.

They are much bigger studio now. And I am sure that they have talented folks in there. But why they can't release iconic games they used to?
Talent drain, suits meddling and putting a lot of their best devs on Titan.
 

GulfCoastZilla

Shinra Employee
Member
Sep 13, 2022
6,652
I really wonder what happened to Blizzard. They released all-time great games back in 90s and early 2000s when they were just a small studio with bunch of young people.

They are much bigger studio now. And I am sure that they have talented folks in there. But why they can't release iconic games they used to?
Those games are still going and making money
 

SilentEagle

Member
Jan 9, 2021
5,786
Those games are still going and making money
Well aren't OW, Hearthstone and even WoW player count peak anymore? I am playing Warcraft Rumble and looks like it's the closest thing we got to Warcraft IV. I just hope MS greenlights RTS projects for Blizzard because they are probably the only AAA publisher who is into RTS games.
 

GulfCoastZilla

Shinra Employee
Member
Sep 13, 2022
6,652
Well aren't OW, Hearthstone and even WoW player count peak anymore? I am playing Warcraft Rumble and looks like it's the closest thing we got to Warcraft IV. I just hope MS greenlights RTS projects for Blizzard because they are probably the only AAA publisher who is into RTS games.
Wow is getting 3 new expansions they are doing fine.
It sounds like people want big time single player experiences from a multiplayer focused company.
 

Acidote

Member
Oct 26, 2017
4,982
Well aren't OW, Hearthstone and even WoW player count peak anymore? I am playing Warcraft Rumble and looks like it's the closest thing we got to Warcraft IV. I just hope MS greenlights RTS projects for Blizzard because they are probably the only AAA publisher who is into RTS games.
OW numbers seem to be doing a little bit better, Hearthstone I have no idea, and WoW is doing right now, at the end of the expansion, better numbers than it was at the start. And it also looks like the new expansion (trilogy) is going to do great numbers. They probably have the best content pace the game has ever had between Retail (with Mists of Pandaria Remix coming in a about a month), Classic and SoD.
 

SilentEagle

Member
Jan 9, 2021
5,786
Wow is getting 3 new expansions they are doing fine.
It sounds like people want big time single player experiences from a multiplayer focused company.
Of course not. I don't expect and want Blizzard to focus on single-player games. Multiplayer is their DNA.

But I want them to return their roots. RTS, ARPG and MMO and do it better than any other studio.
 

Tbm24

Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,352
Of course not. I don't expect and want Blizzard to focus on single-player games. Multiplayer is their DNA.

But I want them to return their roots. RTS, ARPG and MMO and do it better than any other studio.
They're still doing MMOs better than everyone else. I will happily meet anyone in the MMO arena over that take.