Sure, but that's using the copyrighted assets of the script, music, etc. You don't need to do that to in order to put on a performance and if I remember correctly from that play they weren't using any copyrighted assets, so it effectively wouldn't have mattered anyway.I don't think that's true. Schools or community theaters often pay a licensing catalog to get popular plays and scripts. Old stuff in the public domain is easy, but a school trying to do Wicked or Hamilton would pay.
No. This is a massive misconception that pops up every time something vaguely like this happens (if Nintendo doesn't sue to oblivion the developer of this free, obscure fan game that was never released but has footage on YouTube, they'll lose the rights to Mario forever!)I could be completely wrong but don't they have to actively defend their IP when stuff like this is brought to their attention or it's harder for them n the future?
They're supposed to get permission for it. This is why you usually see those in really small bars that don't advertise them externally and do it illegally or you can go to, say, Champ's for it.
I'm pretty sure everyone has seen some variation of this 'public performance' a hundred times in their lives and never once saw someone get charged for it.
Copyright is not the same thing as trademarks. You have to defend your trademarks but not your copyrights, as copyrights have a set time for expiration whereas trademarks have to continuously be renewed.I could be completely wrong but don't they have to actively defend their IP when stuff like this is brought to their attention or it's harder for them n the future? Also they only took a fraction when they were making money off of it.
I'm not a huge fan of Disney eating up everything but I feel like this isn't so bad
lol I was thinking about whoever snitchedit's WILD.
whenever people say this place is too far left, i'll always remember threads like these.
Disney is about to go fully wild. We already know they are adding layers to their copyright protection with trademark law. For instance all their movies now include that cute steam boat willie scene at the beginning. It'll be interesting to see what else they do to ramp up for 2024 Mickey Mouse public domain
Disney is about to go fully wild. We already know they are adding layers to their copyright protection with trademark law. For instance all their movies now include that cute steam boat willie scene at the beginning. It'll be interesting to see what else they do to ramp up for 2024 Mickey Mouse public domain
I could see that happening but I think they realized they cant extend it forever and feel like they can protect their strongest properties with trademark and brand protection and then poach all the other fictional stories characters that enter the public domain and go mwahahah.Don't worry. I'm sure they're already lobbying for another copyright term extension.
Era is a weird mixture of adult liberal and child snitch.it's WILD.
whenever people say this place is too far left, i'll always remember threads like these.
Has to be a jealous parent that didn't get their time to shine for coordinating the event
Oh, they don't seem to be hard line at all with IP rights enforcement against the military units, or the police officers who put giant Punisher skull logos onto their patrol cars.Kind of hilarious, but I can appreciate how consistent Disney is with their hard-line enforcement of their IP rights.
Which school and when did this happen? Asking for a friend...The first time I watched some disney movies were at school as a child.
Can you cease and desist a one time event?I'm the article I read on this, people pointed out that Disney apparently still pays property tax rates from 1978?
The point is that they took money from this school, screwing them over, while hardly contributing to education in the state. It's pretty fucked up.
Couldn't they have just sent a C&D instead?
They probably advertised. Our kids' school says in advance what the kids will watch so that parents can object if it's something with any "themes" to it.People keep asking "who snitched?" but this social media age, they probably snitched on themselves.
Did theyadvertise this on Facebook or did parents/faculty post pics online?
fair is fair. disney has never profited from the work of others, so i can see why they would be protective of their intellectual property.
Are you sure about that? Does the name "KIMBA" ring any bells?
Yes! And a few other cast members. I live like 10 blocks away from that high school lolI'm legitimately surprised that they had to pay just $250. Knowing what Disney are like, I thought the punishment for this would far more severe.
Meanwhile that High School "Alien" play got funding and repeat play with Ridley Scott in the attendance, didn't it?
This was a valuable use of Disney's time. Congrats on the $250.
Who snitched to disney that some random classroom was playing the lion king.I could be completely wrong but don't they have to actively defend their IP when stuff like this is brought to their attention or it's harder for them n the future? Also they only took a fraction when they were making money off of it.
I'm not a huge fan of Disney eating up everything but I feel like this isn't so bad