Meh, with that SSD it's basically 30 TFLOPS anyway so it doesn't matter.
Add Tempest and we have a new super computer.
Most of your posts are in favour of one console though lol. The article is awful btw.Don't see the need to attack the source here. Usman Pirzada is the Head of Business Dev and Senior Editor there and his articles are very well researched and written.
if the gpu is indeed 9.2 tflops then the difference in resolution will be 30%. we will find out come launch.
sony wont be able to hide real world differences just like MS couldnt last gen.
i dont see why cerny would be lying but this is definitely new tech. we need to see it in action.
The only compelling info in that article was the discussion of the silicon...
Essentially unless its N7+, under current manufacturing process it can't reliably hit the boost speeds. I hadn't seen this discussion before
That's the general impression I've got in the last week or so.Some people really can't stand the thought that the PS5 might be inferior to the Xbox SeX this time around huh?
Man, that's like 700 GCN terqflaps!Meh, with that SSD it's basically 30 TFLOPS anyway so it doesn't matter.
Also don't forget that the exclusive DX12 on Xbox will give it another 200% boost and it's effectively like a 3 generation power difference. The PS5 is actually weaker than the N64 if you read between the lines of Cerny's lies.
I should become a writer for one of these sites.
Are we sure MS is going to be in hardware business in three years?Three years after launch we will have the pro version of both consoles.
They assume that the official spec sheet is misleading.It's bad enough I wasted my time reading that but I must ask; why do they have "3.5 Ghz (SMT?)" in their fact sheet? I thought it was made clear it had SMT enabled?
How dare you say positive thing about PS5People act like 10tf rdna 2 is too weak..
We have Ryzen 3.5ghz 8c/16t, 5.5gb/s SSD, GPU that is even better than Radeon VII/RX 5700XT.. Even for 499$ is an amazing machine.
I'm going to plug in an extra NVme drive to squeeze out another 10, maybe 20 TFLOPs.Meh, with that SSD it's basically 30 TFLOPS anyway so it doesn't matter.
It's bad enough I wasted my time reading that but I must ask; why do they have "3.5 Ghz (SMT?)" in their fact sheet? I thought it was made clear it had SMT enabled?
I read it in a comments section from someone with a phil spencer avatar, so it must be true.Is dx12 actually exclusive. I remember people claiming things like that backn when this gen launched but it turned out to not be the case.
I know that'd be like a dream come true for you, but no, I'm pretty sure they'll still be around.Are we sure MS is going to be in hardware business in three years?
PS6 will be an nvme drive.I'm going to plug in an extra NVme drive to squeeze out another 10, maybe 20 TFLOPs.
Yeah that's pretty much confirmation.I read it in a comments section from someone with a phil spencer avatar, so it must be true.
I see far more acknowledgement that ps5 is weaker in power, but has various advantages. Since spec reveal.That's the general impression I've got in the last week or so.
this is a joke right? lolMeh, with that SSD it's basically 30 TFLOPS anyway so it doesn't matter.
Yep thats the trend now
Are we sure MS is going to be in hardware business in three years?
Some people really can't stand the thought that the PS5 might be inferior to the Xbox SeX this time around huh?
Not going to happen, gamers always have to be at war. The next console gen is going to be the best yet, though.How is it misleading when Cerny explained it? They aren't hiding anything lmao
I really want this to end and everyone just accepts next gen is gonna be incredible regardless of what console you get. The fact devs are extremely happy with both consoles should be enough
Did you find this on github?Meh, with that SSD it's basically 30 TFLOPS anyway so it doesn't matter.
QFT. They should publish the min clocks.with Sony only publicizing max clocks in a variable clock machine, they are not wrong at all in questioning it...