DA's artstyle is horrible, and it has no identity at all.
Never finished the games because of this. (And the gameplay also).
Never finished the games because of this. (And the gameplay also).
What is your opinion about Dragon Age's artstyle and identity?
- Thread starter SofNascimento
- Start date
The only one who I feel really DOES do her art justice is Vivienne.
DA's art style is pretty generic but you can still always tell it's DA because of Qunari and a few other things.
DAO was the epitome of bland generic fantasy, not bad but not at all identifiable. DA2 moved into a more distinct and identifiable style and feel but was a bit too edgy, literally. DAI cemented and refined that style overall into a more palatable and interesting take.
It's still fairly generic fantasy, but I find it unique and interesting enough and it works with the lore and setting overall quite well. 2D artwork is especially amazing and if they can infuse that more into the 3D all the better.
It's still fairly generic fantasy, but I find it unique and interesting enough and it works with the lore and setting overall quite well. 2D artwork is especially amazing and if they can infuse that more into the 3D all the better.
OP
OP
As much as I love the games, they're... not very pretty.
Granted, much of Bioware's other games are just very bold and colorful that the muted grays, browns, and earthen tones of Dragon Age feel hohum by comparison.
Granted, I think Inquisition had the best use of color thus far.
I think Inquistion has its moments. The ball quest for example is probably one of my favorites parts of that game. And it does feel vibrant and alive, the masks and costume design for the orlesians was great. This is what Dragon Age should be. But then, the vila itself looks awful. Like the Tevinter fortificaiton I posted early, it looks blocky and bland. Sure this one is a bit more colorful but still feels like it's just a bunch of rectangles on top of each other. Val Royeaux is probably the worst city I ever seen in a RPG, and that's not an overstatment. You have this open world game, you go what might be the single biggest city in the continent and what do you find? A small hub without anything remotely remarkable. And dead, it feels dead.
Another thing: those Inquisition armors are awful. You have soldiers you're gonna be looking at for the majority of the game, and what do they make? Boring and bland armors and costumes.
The only one who I feel really DOES do her art justice is Vivienne.
It kind of does, but she reminds me a lot of Maleficent, so i avoid her in my party haha
I'm amazed at the reading skills of Era sometimes =P
Pre-Inquisition DA games aside, Dragon Age: Inquisition has incredible art direction. The concept art is gorgeous and its influence on the in-game visuals is apparent during action, exploration, and the story sequences quite readily.
I am very happy with the direction the series was heading in in terms of visuals, and I hope Bioware keeps it up for DA4.
People that are upset that the art doesn't moredirectly influence the visuals should maybe consider that the art is only there to guide and set a tone for the in-game asset development teams.
We never got made when Amano's art didn't get translated more closely for the FF games, why not give this team the same benefit of the doubt.
I just hope they can get their quest design and pacing in order, because that's what was lacking most from Inquisition.
I am very happy with the direction the series was heading in in terms of visuals, and I hope Bioware keeps it up for DA4.
People that are upset that the art doesn't moredirectly influence the visuals should maybe consider that the art is only there to guide and set a tone for the in-game asset development teams.
We never got made when Amano's art didn't get translated more closely for the FF games, why not give this team the same benefit of the doubt.
I just hope they can get their quest design and pacing in order, because that's what was lacking most from Inquisition.
From an artstyle perspective, Dragon Age 2 is by far the best when it comes to making all the species look unique rather then being differently sized humans with different ears like Origins and a lot of fantasy does.
The glass eyes and slightly off skin of a lot of surface dwarves made them feel like a species that had lived a lot of their time underground and made me wonder what a DA2 Orzammar Dwarf would have been like. The elves look truly unique and I loved to truly alien look of them and the Qunari that made them truly look like ox/dragon humanoids. Inquisition felt like a massive regress in that unique look but I'm in a minority because I remember a lot of fans hated the DA2 elves.
Of course DA2 map and asset reuse for dungeons, allies etc kind of underminded it lot and is where I feel inquisition improved.
The glass eyes and slightly off skin of a lot of surface dwarves made them feel like a species that had lived a lot of their time underground and made me wonder what a DA2 Orzammar Dwarf would have been like. The elves look truly unique and I loved to truly alien look of them and the Qunari that made them truly look like ox/dragon humanoids. Inquisition felt like a massive regress in that unique look but I'm in a minority because I remember a lot of fans hated the DA2 elves.
Of course DA2 map and asset reuse for dungeons, allies etc kind of underminded it lot and is where I feel inquisition improved.
You can take all of dragon age 1, 2 and 3 and just shove it in any other fantasy game of the time and it would not stick out at all. I have never been a fan of the art style, always felt a bit cheap to me. Its like taking all fantasy games and just chop it into small pieces, and then use that to make something new. That, combined with very average character art and you have yourself a dragon age title.
Sometimes people quote you to agree and add to what you said. It's not always an argument.
