I saw him in Vegas about 10 years ago now maybe. Jim Gaffigan opened for him, and was funnier
Yeah the idea that his career collapsed without Larry misunderstands that Jerry just pivoted back to only doing standup post-Seinfeld. It's not like he tried to stay a TV star the way the rest of the cast tried (and only JLD succeeded at it). Though I disagree he junked his entire set and started over…I saw him a few years ago and he repeated a joke that I heard him make on one of the standup segments in Seinfeld lolHe also didn't just fade away after the show ended. He literally could have done or made anything, but he basically went back to his day job: standup comedy. After Seinfeld, he scrapped all of his material and started fresh again and worked out his material through standup gigs. For a guy that literally never has to work a day in his life, I've always been impressed that he continues to do what he's passionate about.
There's an extremely weird narrative on this forum lately that Jerry is a talentless hack who had nothing to do with the success or quality of Seinfeld and that it's all due to Larry. They co-created that show and co-wrote many episodes together. Jerry is also the lead of that show, and while he's the weakest actor in the cast (though my burning hot take has always been that his performance is actually *underrated*) he is the central performance that all the actors bounce off of. The revisionist stuff is obviously due to Israel but like, that has fuck all to do with the sitcom itself.
It's this impulse, different situation of course, but people don't want problematic people to be talented. I get it, but that's not how people work.
View: https://youtu.be/8JeV8oB0jmM?si=k9PDSACc4xIMiK13
I guess it depends on your definition of success. I think David had a better quality of work overall but Seinfeld was objectively more monetarily successful and I would say more recognizable to the common person.
It's something I really do honestly hate. Why should someone being a shitty person be tied to the quality of their work anyways? Would it be okay for them to be shitty if their work WAS good? It should be totally irrelevant, some people I almost think just get a thrill out of shitting on things more than they genuinely care.
Also feels like 'actually their work was shitty all along and I am enlightened for hating it before they were revealed to be a shitty person' is another facet of this that comes up a lot that I dislike equally.
Naw I get you there, I think Elon Musk worship especially was on another whole level and was problematic from the get-go. I'm mostly referring to people who act that way to vindicate petty dislike of random shows and media and shit more than weird cult of personality worship of a megarich dude that was always sort of '???'I agree with everything you said, although the bolded, I can sort of understand just a teensy bit, but I'm probably biased because I've been on the receiving end of that. Lol. I can't tell you how many times I got into disagreements with friends/coworkers because I didn't think Elon Musk was awesome, or because I couldn't stand Bill Maher. Literal years of that shit, and I never said anymore more than, "I don't really like them. My 'assole radar' goes off with these dudes," so it has felt a little bit vindicating seeing to see the turnaround public perception wise of those two over the past few years. (insert Captain Hold vindication gif here)
Maybe Jerry made so much money he didn't feel like working as much
Larry was a failed comic who helped create and write Seinfeld, starring Jerry Seinfeld. It was a mega hit, still beloved today.
He then did Curb, which I think surpassed Seinfeld, the show.
Jerry had the Bee Movie, Comedians In Cars pod, and still does standup. I haven't seen his standup post Seinfeld show so can't comment there.
But in terms of laughs, I've laughed harder from Larry David, including his interviews, than Jerry.
Larry also gave us better memes.
Did Larry win?
Naw I get you there, I think Elon Musk worship especially was on another whole level and was problematic from the get-go. I'm mostly referring to people who act that way to vindicate petty dislike of random shows and media and shit more than weird cult of personality worship of a megarich dude that was always sort of '???'
But then again I'M biased too because I was also anti-Musk when he was still near universally internet-beloved lol.
There's an extremely weird narrative on this forum lately that Jerry is a talentless hack who had nothing to do with the success or quality of Seinfeld and that it's all due to Larry. They co-created that show and co-wrote many episodes together. Jerry is also the lead of that show, and while he's the weakest actor in the cast (though my burning hot take has always been that his performance is actually *underrated*) he is the central performance that all the actors bounce off of. The revisionist stuff is obviously due to Israel but like, that has fuck all to do with the sitcom itself.
Curb's first 5-7 seasons are fantastic and still kill but imo they're not on the same level of timeless/iconic comedy as Seinfeld (tbf almost nothing is) and I think Curb started running out of gas beginning in S8 anyway. Seinfeld started declining in its eighth season too and people attribute that to Larry leaving, but I think sitcoms just naturally start feeling long in the tooth when they run for that long. If you really want to play the "Seinfeld sucked without Larry" game you also have to reckon with the series finale being the show's most despised episode and that was entirely done by Larry though I always liked it and thought the hate was way overblown
Yeah the idea that his career collapsed without Larry misunderstands that Jerry just pivoted back to only doing standup post-Seinfeld. It's not like he tried to stay a TV star the way the rest of the cast tried (and only JLD succeeded at it). Though I disagree he junked his entire set and started over…I saw him a few years ago and he repeated a joke that I heard him make on one of the standup segments in Seinfeld lol