Depends on the game, but on average cartoon and cell shaded style grab my attention immediately. I'm surprised we didn't see more cell shaded games last gen, given how much tech progressed. Anime style games should all be shaded to the max imo
Which artstyle do you prefer realism or cartoon style
- Thread starter AnimaRize
- Start date
I'm OK with realistic as long as character faces and the world itself are still kind of stylized. Modern games where it looks like a real person is underneath "wearing" the skin of a character really creeps me out, I can't stand the face animation in games like Uncharted, The Last of Us and most modern games because of it. And I don't really like faces that just look like real people.
Both. It just comes down to good artistic taste. Seems like a rarity these days in gaming. Few nail it, most fail at it.
The criticisms of realism seem a little misplaced to me. You can have a realistic style but still be creative in how you design the objects and people that inhabit it. I'm sure you've admired at least a thing or two in the real world despite it being by definition realism, like a neat building or someone's outfit.
"Realism" just like "cartoony" is ultimately exceptionally broad.
"Realism" just like "cartoony" is ultimately exceptionally broad.
Last edited:
For me personally, "stylized" is what I look for; cartoony is good at times, depends on the execution; realistic doesn't interest me at all.
Generally lower fidelity is something that i enjoy more than high fidelity, which i guess can go for both more fantastical or more grounded. Sometimes strange combinations of both can be something i enjoy more than either in isolation, too. Like FF7 Remake has a lot of very realistic assets but exists in a fantastical world and you're put in more interesting places that take advantage of both while remaining similarly meaningful (and which also support a lot of the action/technological craziness going on).
In general any style that isn't supposed to be the video game equivalent of boring real life. I'd say an exception would be Virtua Fighter but even while that is realistic it still has some style to it.
i will say what i want then since you gave permission: that idea is stupid
Depends entirely on how its used. Neither is inherently more valid than another.
I will say though that AAA's obsession with realism is too often used in really boring and unimaginative ways. Show me the weird, cool, reaches of expressivity that also gets a meaningful budget to really explore the reaches of that style.
I will say though that AAA's obsession with realism is too often used in really boring and unimaginative ways. Show me the weird, cool, reaches of expressivity that also gets a meaningful budget to really explore the reaches of that style.
Last edited:
I like both but as others have said, a realistic game will look worse as time goes on where something more stylized will still be able to meet its mark.
In real time, a slight edge to stylized since it can be wholly unique to whatever property it's on and thus be more memorable. But I know I better play/watch anything realistic almost immediately or it'll start to look bad to me fairly soon while stylized has an almost infinite shelf life.
