It's joever. I assume devs also would sign something that prevents them to join other emulation teams. 2.4 million is nothing for nintendo, but get rid of yuzu for good is way more important for them.
Yes, and that argument is extremely flimsy as I have repeated multiple times before. The analogy is that telling people where to buy a lockpick and how to use it does not constitute a crime. The DMCA law is incredibly broad and a judgment against Nintendo in a case like this could lead to a narrowing of the scope of the DMCA which no company wants.Their argument was "Our switch games are encrypted. They provided instructions for decryption tools that breaks DMCA." Nintendo has a hard stance of emulation is bad unless we do it and we don't call what we do emulation.
Don't know why you're being all secretive
Nintendo has the source code for the NES and arcade titles, they're not going to lose TotK's files...
Nintendo has like, the best preservation in the industry. They save everything
I imagine not wanting to open themselves up to legal scrutiny was a factor as well. Emails, financial records, given some of the accusations against Yuzu over the years they probably didn't have the tidiest closet.
That's fair. I was mostly kidding because people took them hiring a lawyer meaning they were confident against Nintendo or whatever.Meh being called a bootlicker would be the least of my concerns. If someone isn't willing to engage me properly, they're at least telling me they aren't worth my time.
If you judge "not been ok" by what Nintendo is willing to go after with limitless money against people who dont want to be drawn into endless legal battles, sure.Imo, emulators from current gen system should not exist. Perhaps the reason why other emulators have, to my knowledge, been ok, is that. Dolphin on Steam was a bit much and was removed. I would hate creating something, making a living out of it, and some random people copy my ideas, trademarks. Here im not saying emulation is shit, i think its necessary for keeping older games ´alive ' and playable for those who can't purchase games that are part of history.
But i dont understand people being angry at Nintendo and want to boycott them. I think by just saying that your not supporting the console and promoting piracy lol.
this. People forget that Switch is still their current console.It kind of proves Nintendo's point, right?
It's one thing for Nintendo to go after people trying to emulate older systems that are no longer available. That's a dick move. But this suit seemed entirely justifiable. It's the equivalent of 80,000 Switches. Small potatoes after you've sold 150M or whatever the number is now. But not insignificant.
And that's how we got the Mana collection since SQEX had lost the source code for those games... it's a real shame we can't have all the games on their vault available, at least the 1st party ones... specially the Satellaview versions, those deserve to be seen by everyone.Nintendo is widely known for their strong preservation, allll the way back to the 90s. One of the few that actively stores and preserves any and all games they are involved with.
Just because it's not all publicly available, does not mean stuff isn't being preserved. It's a nonsense take.
What bluff? Yuzu folded completely. This is monetary compensation and p.injunction (all dev on Yuzu ceases and they have to delete all data they have).Seems like they called Nintendo's bluff.
I think it was likely clear cut that Yuzu was legally ok but Nintendo probably half expected them to just pack it up and leave, but since the case would drag out forever (not in Yuzu's interest) and probably end with Nintendo paying court fees (not in Nintendo's interest) it makes sense they would just take the payout option and move on instead of bringing more attention to Yuzu
It also could be that they were like "shrug, we had a good run", they pay off Nintendo two milly and then retire on whatever else they had.
Yeah I'm with you here but I was kind of scared to say it as we have some very passionate people who disagree stronglyImo, emulators from current gen system should not exist. Perhaps the reason why other emulators have, to my knowledge, been ok, is that. Dolphin on Steam was a bit much and was removed. I would hate creating something, making a living out of it, and some random people copy my ideas, trademarks. Here im not saying emulation is shit, i think its necessary for keeping older games ´alive ' and playable for those who can't purchase games that are part of history.
But i dont understand people being angry at Nintendo and want to boycott them. I think by just saying that your not supporting the console and promoting piracy lol.
dolphin barely gets updated anymore sooDolphin Emulator - GameCube/Wii games on PC
Official website of Dolphin, the GameCube and Wii emulator. Download the latest version (5.0-21529) now or ask questions on our forums for help.dolphin-emu.org
No, they aren't blocking anything.This is a settlement.I don't know much about the switch emulator scene but looking at it, aren't they also blocking the tools to pull the bios and games too? That feels like they could go after anyone trying to create an emulation scene. No point in the emulator if you can't pull the data for use.
What bluff? Yuzu folded completely. This is monetary compensation and p.injunction (all dev on Yuzu ceases and they have to delete all data they have).
Seems like they called Nintendo's bluff.
I think it was likely clear cut that Yuzu was legally ok but Nintendo probably half expected them to just pack it up and leave, but since the case would drag out forever (not in Yuzu's interest) and probably end with Nintendo paying court fees (not in Nintendo's interest) it makes sense they would just take the payout option and move on instead of bringing more attention to Yuzu
This is straight up not even close to being true in any way shape or form. Please don't spread misinformation like that
Yuzu development went into overdrive the moment the game got leaked on May 1st... Yuzu EA-3555 fixed the fucked up grass that people were complaining about and that was released on May 4th. There's way more examples of other unreleased games I can't be arsed to list off but if any of this came up in court they know they'd get cooked which is why they rightfully fell back.How about providing where y'all got that from, because afaik Yuzu never released updates for Totk before the game came out.
It does but doesn't seem like it because there's not much more to update apart from miniscule highly specific things, not because they don't make money. The amount of shit you can do with Dolphin is mind blowing. There was a time before the store closed where you could connect to the Wii shop channel, add real money, buy and download games directly from Nintendo through it.
You better start praying then.
It's not a legal precedent but people will think twice before dabbling into "Patreon" emulation now. Unless they want summons from Nintendo.I feel like some people in here are confusing a settlement with an actual court ruling changing the laws surrounding emulators
It's joever. I assume devs also would sign something that prevents them to join other emulation teams. 2.4 million is nothing for nintendo, but get rid of yuzu for good is way more important for them.