Nice. This surely won't impact already severely short staffed hospital workers.
My hospital has 1 to 2 vaccinated staff a week turning up positive. I really don't get this decision.Nice. This surely won't impact already severely short staffed hospital workers.
For some idiotic reason these advisory panels only seem to care about severe illness, clearly waning protection from infection and "mild-moderate" illness is totally fine!Nice. This surely won't impact already severely short staffed hospital workers.
They're mostly focused on hospitalizations and severe cases, not merely positive cases among the vaccinated.My hospital has 1 to 2 vaccinated staff a week turning up positive. I really don't get this decision.
I agree in theory but you can't work when sick. We are short staffed as it is without people staying home with Covid. Prevention of infection in healthcare workers should be a priority.They're mostly focused on hospitalizations and severe cases, not merely positive cases among the vaccinated.
Just not enough data for them for the latter to want to risk it for people not with a health risk if they just have to deal with no symptoms to mild-moderate.
They're mostly focused on hospitalizations and severe cases, not merely positive cases among the vaccinated.
Just not enough data for them for the latter to want to risk it for people not with a health risk if they just have to deal with no symptoms to mild-moderate.
This kind of stuff makes the general public trust the government less (and decide not to take the damn vaccine).
the thing that stands out to me is how backward this process seems?
Why does an intention come from the White House and then go to the health authorities?
Seems like it just allows confusion to reign because presumably the people making those earlier calls are not experts
iirc how it worked here in England, it went to our medicines regulator, then it went to a vaccination committee, and the chief medical officer, then the politicians decided on a plan of action based on their recommendations
However, Walensky decided to make one recommendation that the panel had rejected.
The panel on Thursday voted against saying that people can get a booster if they are ages 18 to 64 years and are health-care workers or have another job that puts them at increased risk of being exposed to the virus.
But Walensky disagreed and put that recommendation back in, noting that such a move aligns with an FDA booster authorization decision earlier this week. The category she included covers people who live in institutional settings that increase their risk of exposure, such as prisons or homeless shelters, as well as health care workers.
The panel had offered the option of a booster for those ages 18 to 49 who have chronic health problems and want one. But the advisers refused to go further and open boosters to otherwise healthy front-line health care workers who aren't at risk of severe illness but want to avoid even a mild infection.
The panel voted 9 to 6 to reject that proposal. But Walensky decided to disregard the advisory committee's counsel on that issue. In a decision several hours after the panel adjourned, Walensky issued a statement saying she had restored the recommendation.
Why are you asking me? I'm just saying that was their reasoning going against it.cool cool. So who is going to take care of those with severe symptoms when the short staffed hospitals are even more short staffed because some of their workers can't come in due to mild-moderate symptoms?
Ok so I'm eligible for a booster for sure now? (I'm a nurse in an inpatient hospital btw)Some good news. CDC Advisory panel overruled.
CDC leader adds people with risky jobs to COVID booster list
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has endorsed COVID-19 booster shots for millions of older or otherwise vulnerable Americans.apnews.com
Seems like you could go to Walgreens tommorow, along with any other essential workers.Ok so I'm eligible for a booster for sure now? (I'm a nurse in an inpatient hospital btw)
Beginning tomorrow, appointments for a COVID-19 booster shot and additional immunizations can be scheduled through Walgreens.com/ScheduleVaccine, by calling 1-800-Walgreens or by calling a local Walgreens store.
Eligible individuals can receive their booster shot at least six months after they completed their Pfizer COVID-19 primary vaccine series.
Booster Eligibility
The following populations are eligible to receive a booster dose at this time:
- Individuals ages 65 and older.
- Long-term care facility residents ages 18 and older.
- Individuals ages 18 and older with underlying medical conditions. Individuals ages 18 – 49 should consider individual benefits and risks, according to CDC guidance.
- Individuals ages 18-64 who are at an increased risk for COVID-19 exposure and transmission because of occupational or institutional setting, such as healthcare and essential workers
Possible but healthcare workers have an increased chance of risk due to the increased amount of people in the hospital with confirmed COVIDDoes being a sales rep, inside multiple stores all day around the public qualify as an occupational increased risk?
Why are you asking me? I'm just saying that was their reasoning going against it.
Luckily, Walensky overruled them.
If you want a booster it's not hard to getDoes being a sales rep, inside multiple stores all day around the public qualify as an occupational increased risk?
Does being a sales rep, inside multiple stores all day around the public qualify as an occupational increased risk?