No
Studio heads are just less creative
No
Honestly, I don't think so. I think creativity is actually at an all time high right now but the problem is that these Movie Studios are so focused on the bottom line (money), that they end up sucking away all the life or passion out of these movies before they're finished due to wanting to rush these products out as quick as possible. If everyone involved in the creation of these movies were given the time they need to properly finish these movies, we'd likely see a stark difference in the quality of movies today. But, as we know, these studios don't care because all they're thinking about is maximizing profits, which means everyone involved with and everything in these movies suffer along the way.
5 years ago. This is the prequel to that.
Spot on.I literally cannot imagine a less exciting first reveal pic that at least included a lion.
That is laughably anti-hype. You could tell me that's a grab from the last live action movie (that I saw twice) and I'd 100% believe you.
Cruella is a character who's whole thing is slaughtering a litter of puppies to make a coat... right? I don't know if she's sympathetic hahaThats different as it was a bit darker and tackled more mature subject matter in a non-Disney kid way. Maybe sympathy wasn't the right word, instead I should've said it would be difficult to make the evil character moderately likable and show them in a positive light so that the audience is "rooting" for them.
Cruella is a character who's whole thing is slaughtering a litter of puppies to make a coat... right? I don't know if she's sympathetic haha
Cruella had no redeemable qualities about her in the original. They made them up for the movie about her past and put in a woman (Emma Thompson) that seemed way more like Cruella than Cruella herself in her own movie. They could make some shit up.Im not 100% familiar with the characters but Scar seemed a bit more evil than Cruella and Mal. I can't imagine trying to portray him in any kind of likable way.
Cruella had no redeemable qualities about her in the original. They made them up for the movie about her past and put in a woman (Emma Thompson) that seemed way more like Cruella than Cruella herself in her own movie. They could make some shit up.
This films is actually going to do the whole "Want to know how I got this Scar?" storyline and I hate it.
The Lion King is a beloved classic, and it brought in the old audience and a brand new one.
Sort of surprised they didn't do a young Scar movie, like they did with Cruella and Malifecent.
Either way, that looks awful, and no thanks.
I feel you. To be clear, I don't love the "here's the villain's origin story!" movie trend. I guess my argument here is more that the train has left the station on whether or not they should be making villain origin movies, and a creative enough writer could probably make a young Scar story "work".Hence "Maybe sympathy wasn't the right word,"
Anyways...wasn't saying the characters themselves are sympathetic but that the audience was intended to feel sympathy for them at some point.
Thats different as it was a bit darker and tackled more mature subject matter in a non-Disney kid way. Maybe sympathy wasn't the right word, instead I should've said it would be difficult to make the evil character moderately likable and show them in a positive light so that the audience is "rooting" for them.
Leak culture's getting out of handI have an exclusive second shot of the movie here that definitely isn't just the first google image result for "a lion" please enjoy:
I have an exclusive second shot of the movie here that definitely isn't just the first google image result for "a lion" please enjoy: