The drawbridges are going up all over the world.
It will be a very different place when they come down again.
It will be a very different place when they come down again.
Please read what I'm actually saying. Based on the official numbers published, 1258 are recoved, 1153 have died. That's almost a 50% draw. Why would the people that have it right now have a different percentual outcome than this? (serious question, please give a good argument).
It takes longer to recover than it takes to succumb to the illness. Framing the issue as recovered vs dead is inaccurate interpretation while the situation is still ongoing.Please read what I'm actually saying. Based on the official numbers published, 1258 are recoved, 1153 have died. That's almost a 50% draw. Why would the people that have it right now have a different percentual outcome than this? (serious question, please give a good argument).
If enough of the world gets it then who knows what will happen afterwards.
The drawbridges are going up all over the world.
It will be a very different place when they come down again.
Sounds like Belgium.
This might have been posted earlier today but I didn't see it and the thread moved so fast. It's nice to finally put this aspect of the virus to bed.
Sounds like Belgium.
Tomorrow I need to do grocery shopping. Hopefully the rush has died down and stocks are refilled. Some supermarkets had hour long wait times and no available carts tonight because of people panic-shopping.
The drawbridges are going up all over the world.
It will be a very different place when they come down again.
Boris is going to kill so many people and he's going to get re-elected anyway.
This country is so fucked.
We're all so fucked.
Please read what I'm actually saying. Based on the official numbers published, 1258 are recoved, 1153 have died. That's almost a 50% draw. Why would the people that have it right now have a different percentual outcome than this? (serious question, please give a good argument).
Looking at masks at the moment on Amazon, need to travel soon, any recommendations?
In the absolute worst case scenario? We bounce back with a slightly lower population, mourn the dead, and hope that we are better prepared for the next crisis. The Spanish flu killed 20-50 million people over two years, yet society in 1925 didn't seem that impacted compared to 1915.
It's not a great situation, but it's also not an "asteroid strike wiping out the dinosaurs"-situation. Additionally, we have a planet that is literally bursting into flames with effects that will kill far greater numbers and upset social order across the planet for decades to come, so I really think you need to take a few steps back on the apathy <-> total panic scale.
Obviously because recovery takes two weeks+ and deaths can happen a lot faster than that, especially in the elderly, so recoveries will lag behind deaths.Please read what I'm actually saying. Based on the official numbers published, 1258 are recoved, 1153 have died. That's almost a 50% draw. Why would the people that have it right now have a different percentual outcome than this? (serious question, please give a good argument).
Super-rich jet off to disaster bunkers amid coronavirus outbreak
‘Self isolate’ for some of world’s richest means Covid-19 tests abroad, personal medics and subterranean hide-outswww.theguardian.com
Odds are not everyone that is sick is being tested, and that numbers are being suppressed to not look as bad.Infections seem to have flattened out in China and South Korea. Taiwan also seems to be handling things well. And I would imagine cases in Italy to start drastically falling in the coming weeks given the extreme measures they just put in place.
If other countries follow a similar pattern, I just don't see how we get to some of the big figures like 70% of the world population being infected. Is the assumption here that cases in those countries will inevitably spike back up eventually?
This is totally in line with the way it was in China months ago.Please read what I'm actually saying. Based on the official numbers published, 1258 are recoved, 1153 have died. That's almost a 50% draw. Why would the people that have it right now have a different percentual outcome than this? (serious question, please give a good argument).
Because you're comparing the recovered people, which usually entered the hospitals 3 weeks ago (total cases in italy 3 weeks ago, 150 or so), vs the number of people who died up to now, which may have entered the hospital the day before their death (so on 10k cases). Your comparison make no sense.
The mechanic of recovering means that recovering people will always lag behind deceased people on the total of cases. How long? In this case, since it's not only about people not having symptom , but not having a virus at all, it could be up to two weeks or so, which means you're overestimating the death rate by 2 weeks, in an esponential growth which double every 3 day, or 30 times as much.
That depends on what you think the death rate is right now. I've heard it's similar as the flu (0,1%) and 2% (based on the infected cases versus confirmed deaths), but the actual confirmed outcome numbers are showing much higher figures. 6% is the most stable number of global confirmed death versus confirmed cured, since I started checking it two weeks ago. But looking at Italy, it's around 50% right now. But we have to take into account that not all infected are counted among the living and reporting the cured probably isn't highest priority. So 6%+ is my the curreny estimation that we can make with any certainty.
And really, I hope I'm wrong. But I can't see any other way to interpret the data I'm seeing. So that's why I'm hoping other statisticly inclined people can propose counter arguments.
Please read what I'm actually saying. Based on the official numbers published, 1258 are recoved, 1153 have died. That's almost a 50% draw. Why would the people that have it right now have a different percentual outcome than this? (serious question, please give a good argument).
Please read what I'm actually saying. Based on the official numbers published, 1258 are recoved, 1153 have died. That's almost a 50% draw. Why would the people that have it right now have a different percentual outcome than this? (serious question, please give a good argument).
I prefer the more traditional style:Looking at masks at the moment on Amazon, need to travel soon, any recommendations?
Only if forced to, school admins are the kind that likes to scoff and downplay the seriousness of the situation.
Hmmm, that is a very interesting counter point. Thanks!
But if understand your comment correctly it's that we can't compare deaths to cured because there's leadtime between them, just as there's leadtime between confirmed sick and dead right? So both numbers are equally inaccurate. Or is there more to it?
Looking at masks at the moment on Amazon, need to travel soon, any recommendations?
This might have been posted earlier today but I didn't see it and the thread moved so fast. It's nice to finally put this aspect of the virus to bed.
If the population is already on guard, then not really. It's not like at the beginning of an outbreak where either nobody knows what's going on or nobody is taking it seriously, so the virus can quietly spread far and wide. China might see pockets of cases again, but it's unlikely to pick up exponential growth again in that country. The conditions there just aren't conducive for it anymore.but remember if we return to normal all it takes is one person not fully healed to start it all over again in an area.
This might have been posted earlier today but I didn't see it and the thread moved so fast. It's nice to finally put this aspect of the virus to bed.
I, too, love to use Fox News correspondents as sources.
Yeah I thought Belgium.
I'm just wondering if either of you picked-up on the punchline in there.Why you have to be weird when I posted some good news. I didn't know she was with Fox I just saw it had a ton of likes and the info checked out. Jeez.
Wanna take a bet on that?Rich can get tested quicker but sorry, gotta wait in the line like the rest of us for a vaccine. COVID-19 doesn't take cash.
Shit we know how you feel here US its really messed up.Half the kids at school are going to be off tomorrow because they have coughs, guess who's going to be looking after them? Grandparents, the ones the UK are trying to protect.
This inaction and the reasons for it are mind boggling.
This might have been posted earlier today but I didn't see it and the thread moved so fast. It's nice to finally put this aspect of the virus to bed.
I'd like to believe you are right, but I also know that a large portion of the US knew what was coming and they still are doing a horrible job of containing it.If the population is already on guard, then not really. It's not like at the beginning of an outbreak where either nobody knows what's going on or nobody is taking it seriously, so the virus can quietly spread far and wide. China might see pockets of cases again, but it's unlikely to pick up exponential growth again in that country. The conditions there just aren't conducive for it anymore.
Gigantic if true.
Mormons canceled worldwide?
St. George News on Twitter
“LDS church cancels services worldwide as COVID-19 pandemic continues #stgeorge #utah #southernutah #cedarcity https://t.co/619IJ6mISa”twitter.com