Copper

Banned
Nov 13, 2017
666
Please read what I'm actually saying. Based on the official numbers published, 1258 are recoved, 1153 have died. That's almost a 50% draw. Why would the people that have it right now have a different percentual outcome than this? (serious question, please give a good argument).

Because you're comparing the recovered people, which usually entered the hospitals 3 weeks ago (total cases in italy 3 weeks ago, 150 or so), vs the number of people who died up to now, which may have entered the hospital the day before their death (so on 10k cases). Your comparison make no sense.

The mechanic of recovering means that recovering people will always lag behind deceased people on the total of cases. How long? In this case, since it's not only about people not having symptom , but not having a virus at all, it could be up to two weeks or so, which means you're overestimating the death rate by 2 weeks, in an esponential growth which double every 3 day, or 30 times as much.
 

Divvy

Teyvat Traveler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,255
Please read what I'm actually saying. Based on the official numbers published, 1258 are recoved, 1153 have died. That's almost a 50% draw. Why would the people that have it right now have a different percentual outcome than this? (serious question, please give a good argument).
It takes longer to recover than it takes to succumb to the illness. Framing the issue as recovered vs dead is inaccurate interpretation while the situation is still ongoing.

Take for instance a car accident that involves ten people. One dies and the other nine have broken bones that will take six months to heal. It would be inaccurate to say one month after the accident that it had a 100% death rate because the others have not recovered fully yet.
 

CoolOff

Avenger
Oct 26, 2017
3,461
If enough of the world gets it then who knows what will happen afterwards.

In the absolute worst case scenario? We bounce back with a slightly lower population, mourn the dead, and hope that we are better prepared for the next crisis. The Spanish flu killed 20-50 million people over two years, yet society in 1925 didn't seem that impacted compared to 1915.

It's not a great situation, but it's also not an "asteroid strike wiping out the dinosaurs"-situation. Additionally, we have a planet that is literally bursting into flames with effects that will kill far greater numbers and upset social order across the planet for decades to come, so I really think you need to take a few steps back on the apathy <-> total panic scale.
 

Scuffed

Member
Oct 28, 2017
11,363



This might have been posted earlier today but I didn't see it and the thread moved so fast. It's nice to finally put this aspect of the virus to bed.
 

Curler

Member
Oct 26, 2017
15,645
The drawbridges are going up all over the world.

It will be a very different place when they come down again.


It took me all day to catch up on the half a day of news in here. Wow, I have no words...

When the dust starts settling I wonder which of 2 things will happen:

1) A HUGE surge of people going out, travelling, etc. after being locked in/stuff cancelled

2) Majority of people still being cautious, not leaving homes, still stocking up on goods like tp....
 

Deleted member 21709

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
23,310



This might have been posted earlier today but I didn't see it and the thread moved so fast. It's nice to finally put this aspect of the virus to bed.


I, too, love to use Fox News correspondents as sources.

Sounds like Belgium.

Tomorrow I need to do grocery shopping. Hopefully the rush has died down and stocks are refilled. Some supermarkets had hour long wait times and no available carts tonight because of people panic-shopping.

Yeah I thought Belgium.
 

KingSnake

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,091
Please read what I'm actually saying. Based on the official numbers published, 1258 are recoved, 1153 have died. That's almost a 50% draw. Why would the people that have it right now have a different percentual outcome than this? (serious question, please give a good argument).

It takes much longer to recover than to die to put it simple. That's why this logic doesn't work. But the argument that the mortality rate is not the full story is somehow valid and can only be properly calculated after the end of the epidemic practically.
 

Plum

Member
May 31, 2018
17,405
In the absolute worst case scenario? We bounce back with a slightly lower population, mourn the dead, and hope that we are better prepared for the next crisis. The Spanish flu killed 20-50 million people over two years, yet society in 1925 didn't seem that impacted compared to 1915.

It's not a great situation, but it's also not an "asteroid strike wiping out the dinosaurs"-situation. Additionally, we have a planet that is literally bursting into flames with effects that will kill far greater numbers and upset social order across the planet for decades to come, so I really think you need to take a few steps back on the apathy <-> total panic scale.

I'm in constant anxiety about the environment as well lol

Shit just seems so incredibly fucked, and frankly right now the only thing I care about is my family and them being safe. I do care about the world at large but holy shit I don't want my family to die...
 

MayorSquirtle

Member
May 17, 2018
8,414
Please read what I'm actually saying. Based on the official numbers published, 1258 are recoved, 1153 have died. That's almost a 50% draw. Why would the people that have it right now have a different percentual outcome than this? (serious question, please give a good argument).
Obviously because recovery takes two weeks+ and deaths can happen a lot faster than that, especially in the elderly, so recoveries will lag behind deaths.
 

zulux21

Member
Oct 25, 2017
20,462
Infections seem to have flattened out in China and South Korea. Taiwan also seems to be handling things well. And I would imagine cases in Italy to start drastically falling in the coming weeks given the extreme measures they just put in place.

If other countries follow a similar pattern, I just don't see how we get to some of the big figures like 70% of the world population being infected. Is the assumption here that cases in those countries will inevitably spike back up eventually?
Odds are not everyone that is sick is being tested, and that numbers are being suppressed to not look as bad.

but remember if we return to normal all it takes is one person not fully healed to start it all over again in an area.

plus don't forget 20% of america are absolute dummies that still think that this is a hoax or just being played up by the media for clicks that are going to go on with their lives like nothing is happening including traveling around the world if they aren't stopped. (like there are dummies in all the countries but I will actively point out the dummies in america that are part of the cult of trump.)
 

Halbrand

Member
Oct 27, 2017
19,636
Please read what I'm actually saying. Based on the official numbers published, 1258 are recoved, 1153 have died. That's almost a 50% draw. Why would the people that have it right now have a different percentual outcome than this? (serious question, please give a good argument).
This is totally in line with the way it was in China months ago.
 

Geido

Member
Oct 30, 2017
1,133
Because you're comparing the recovered people, which usually entered the hospitals 3 weeks ago (total cases in italy 3 weeks ago, 150 or so), vs the number of people who died up to now, which may have entered the hospital the day before their death (so on 10k cases). Your comparison make no sense.

The mechanic of recovering means that recovering people will always lag behind deceased people on the total of cases. How long? In this case, since it's not only about people not having symptom , but not having a virus at all, it could be up to two weeks or so, which means you're overestimating the death rate by 2 weeks, in an esponential growth which double every 3 day, or 30 times as much.

Hmmm, that is a very interesting counter point. Thanks!

But if understand your comment correctly it's that we can't compare deaths to cured because there's leadtime between them, just as there's leadtime between confirmed sick and dead right? So both numbers are equally inaccurate. Or is there more to it?
 

RefreshZ

Member
Oct 27, 2017
474
That depends on what you think the death rate is right now. I've heard it's similar as the flu (0,1%) and 2% (based on the infected cases versus confirmed deaths), but the actual confirmed outcome numbers are showing much higher figures. 6% is the most stable number of global confirmed death versus confirmed cured, since I started checking it two weeks ago. But looking at Italy, it's around 50% right now. But we have to take into account that not all infected are counted among the living and reporting the cured probably isn't highest priority. So 6%+ is my the curreny estimation that we can make with any certainty.

And really, I hope I'm wrong. But I can't see any other way to interpret the data I'm seeing. So that's why I'm hoping other statisticly inclined people can propose counter arguments.

This is far too early to estimate accurately. Daily running tallies only really help to highlight hotspots. First of all comparing number cured to number of deaths alone is whack. This is ignoring the majority that have tested positive and are undergoing treatment and the great unknown - the number who have it and are entirely asymptomatic. Both of the latter will decrease the overall mortality rate significantly. We will only arrive at a better understanding of these numbers when the pandemic is reaching the end of the flattened curve in every region.
 

Kurdel

Member
Nov 7, 2017
12,157
Please read what I'm actually saying. Based on the official numbers published, 1258 are recoved, 1153 have died. That's almost a 50% draw. Why would the people that have it right now have a different percentual outcome than this? (serious question, please give a good argument).

Keep in mind the total of infected people is the number of people who were tested, it's a certainty that way more people have it.

Whereas the death toll is prety straight forward.

Simply comparing both isn't enough to get a death rate.
 

Shroki

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,918
Please read what I'm actually saying. Based on the official numbers published, 1258 are recoved, 1153 have died. That's almost a 50% draw. Why would the people that have it right now have a different percentual outcome than this? (serious question, please give a good argument).

The vast majority of people who have it are recovering and will not even need medical intervention. Those are not "closed cases" so they are not "recovered" but they will not die.

Nobody is lying to you when they say about 3%.
 

ArtTeitlebaum

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,268
Europe
Looking at masks at the moment on Amazon, need to travel soon, any recommendations?
I prefer the more traditional style:
51PFhe0w14L._AC_SL1001_.jpg
 

CoolOff

Avenger
Oct 26, 2017
3,461
Hmmm, that is a very interesting counter point. Thanks!

But if understand your comment correctly it's that we can't compare deaths to cured because there's leadtime between them, just as there's leadtime between confirmed sick and dead right? So both numbers are equally inaccurate. Or is there more to it?

I mean, none of the numbers are inaccurate? You just have be aware of the nuances of what you're seeing, watching countries that are further along in the development like South Korea (who also have tested the best) etc. to get a better idea of the situation. Actual CFR you can't really tell until after enough cases has gone through the entire course of illness and you have a better idea of total infected.

Saying the reporting on it is bad because they're using current numbers seems strange to me.
 

GYODX

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,330
but remember if we return to normal all it takes is one person not fully healed to start it all over again in an area.
If the population is already on guard, then not really. It's not like at the beginning of an outbreak where either nobody knows what's going on or nobody is taking it seriously, so the virus can quietly spread far and wide. China might see pockets of cases again, but it's unlikely to pick up exponential growth again in that country. The conditions there just aren't conducive for it anymore.
 

Praxis

Sausage Tycoon
Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,353
UK
Half the kids at school are going to be off tomorrow because they have coughs, guess who's going to be looking after them? Grandparents, the ones the UK are trying to protect.

This inaction and the reasons for it are mind boggling.
 

lunarworks

Member
Oct 25, 2017
22,659
Toronto



This might have been posted earlier today but I didn't see it and the thread moved so fast. It's nice to finally put this aspect of the virus to bed.

I, too, love to use Fox News correspondents as sources.



Yeah I thought Belgium.
Why you have to be weird when I posted some good news. I didn't know she was with Fox I just saw it had a ton of likes and the info checked out. Jeez.
I'm just wondering if either of you picked-up on the punchline in there.
 

TheZynster

Member
Oct 26, 2017
13,330
Damn, someone told people that my jewel had the goods because Jesus it was a mad house there. I have never seen it that busy. The toilet paper aisle was completely full yesterday, today it was people taking pictures of the toilet paper aisle.

I even saw a dude with a full cart of the Scott single rolls because there were no packs, like do you folks really need that much god damn toilet paper?
 

zulux21

Member
Oct 25, 2017
20,462
If the population is already on guard, then not really. It's not like at the beginning of an outbreak where either nobody knows what's going on or nobody is taking it seriously, so the virus can quietly spread far and wide. China might see pockets of cases again, but it's unlikely to pick up exponential growth again in that country. The conditions there just aren't conducive for it anymore.
I'd like to believe you are right, but I also know that a large portion of the US knew what was coming and they still are doing a horrible job of containing it.

the main reason China is slowing is because they aren't remotely back to living a normal life.

We are never going to get all of america being careful with hygiene and avoiding social contact.
 

NSA

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
3,892
Gigantic if true.

Mormons canceled worldwide?

twitter.com

St. George News on Twitter

“LDS church cancels services worldwide as COVID-19 pandemic continues #stgeorge #utah #southernutah #cedarcity https://t.co/619IJ6mISa”