Darthvadernoooo.gif
ONE GAME! I town read you in Mansion :'(Every damn game man. I'm starting to think you don't love me :(
So who do I vote for that will not send off scum alarms...
VOTE: Faddy
I went over my reads again, tried to get some more ideas... But the more I dig, the more I smell something fishy coming out of the lovers claim. Just can't ignore it any more - weighed the consequences, and I think we'll be ok even in the worst of the possible outcomes. So...
Vote:Rover
Reasons are kinda spread over my previous posts, but to sum up: I've been kinda wary about the lovers claim since Day 1 (voted Sparky), and multiple posts from Rover make him look really suspicious. Justifying the last twist saying it was bait is kind of the last straw for me.
I'll be going to sleep really soon and I'll be back long before EoD for sure.
Oh, and also... Ty4on has disappeared right after the very start of Day 2. Come back and tell us your reads man.
People have pointed that this is an odd post to make, and I just remembered that the ERA scum meta was to let Fanto live as long as possible so it really was a weird kill to make. This does sound like Faddy defense though.I'll put this to you but really I have been desperate to post this all day but it is self centred.
There is absolutely no way I kill Fantomas as mafia. Think back to the disaster that was Brexit. Me and Sophia had Fanto more or less as our biggest ally then we killed him and it went to hell. Fanto and I were pretty aligned in this game and I am not going to recreate failed strategies.
My detractors from what the main ones I remember, and I'm obviously trying to avoid being OMGUSy here:Made the post too soon, sorry Kopite.
You haven't posted in a while, anything to add, what do you think of your detractors, you said you wanted to have a closer look at me due to my disappearance at EOD, have you found anything worth sharing?
As for yourself you'll remember you scumread me in Maple Street when I was scum, you made a few good arguments and went through my posts and pointed out some scum tells. I thought you were doing a good job scumhunting that game so it was suspicous to me that you seemed a lot more passive this game. You didn't elaborate for your reasoning for a vote on turmoil too much past that it was a gut vote. I didn't pressure you too much on your more recent lack of activity though because I read that you were ill though?Made the post too soon, sorry Kopite.
You haven't posted in a while, anything to add, what do you think of your detractors, you said you wanted to have a closer look at me due to my disappearance at EOD, have you found anything worth sharing?
All in all there's nothing vehemently scummy here but if I had a vigshot I needed to take right here right now I would pull the trigger on Kalor.
I was going to, but after pondering it for a bit I think I feel worse about AeleusWho will you vote for? And why aren't you voting for me right now if I'm the one you would shoot right now?
So who do I vote for that will not send off scum alarms...
VOTE: Faddy
Why are you so obsessed with how you appear? That's not the first time that you mention taking actions so you don't appear as scum.
Doesn't one want to not be seen as scum no matter their alignment? I'm just making it more obvious because I've clearly got a target on my back already due to previous games.
Doesn't one want to not be seen as scum no matter their alignment? I'm just making it more obvious because I've clearly got a target on my back already due to previous games.
As for yourself you'll remember you scumread me in Maple Street when I was scum, you made a few good arguments and went through my posts and pointed out some scum tells. I thought you were doing a good job scumhunting that game so it was suspicous to me that you seemed a lot more passive this game. You didn't elaborate for your reasoning for a vote on turmoil too much past that it was a gut vote. I didn't pressure you too much on your more recent lack of activity though because I read that you were ill though?
I think it's a case of scum laying low and letting town do the work 🤔🧐Are we in an uncomfortable silence because scum doesn't know how to position the day?
Are we in an uncomfortable silence because scum doesn't know how to position the day?
Are we in an uncomfortable silence because scum doesn't know how to position the day?
Vincent: There might be scum on Turmoil vote.Travelling all day (with Cabot, nonetheless, and he's already started singing about footballers who love bees) so I'm not going to be around much.
So putting down a vote in case I'm AWOL later (if he keeps singing about bees, I'll be hitting the cocktails the minute we arrive).
vote: Vincent Alexander
Pretty likely that there's scum on the turmoil vote (I've already voiced concerns about a few of the early ones) and VA was one of the later votes.
On top of that, I'm still lost on why it was so difficult to answer me yesterday when I asked him who he thought was scum on the turmoil vote and he just kept going "well I don't know" and said he'd let me know in a few days.
Following on from Brazil's vote, VA admitted that he didn't think anyone would ask him to investigate his "there must be scum over there" statement. Why say it if you don't actually want to talk about it?
It's either trying to look busy/involved Or it's because his scum team weren't around to tell him what to say.
No matter how you look at it, I'm not impressed.
I'll check in when I can but Ive been travelling since 6am and I'm on my third train of the day and I'd actually like to do some holiday stuff when I get there. Woohoo York!
Vikings! Ghosts! Cocktails! Cabot singing about bees -_-
Do you have a vig shot?All in all there's nothing vehemently scummy here but if I had a vigshot I needed to take right here right now I would pull the trigger on Kalor.
I didn't even need one with all that bait he laid out.
I was ill but you had already said that you were going to look into my posts due to my disappearance earlier, I was just interested in seeing the results of your efforts. Also while I was willing to that ISO just for you last game, I tend to be more of a gut read player in general.As for yourself you'll remember you scumread me in Maple Street when I was scum, you made a few good arguments and went through my posts and pointed out some scum tells. I thought you were doing a good job scumhunting that game so it was suspicous to me that you seemed a lot more passive this game. You didn't elaborate for your reasoning for a vote on turmoil too much past that it was a gut vote. I didn't pressure you too much on your more recent lack of activity though because I read that you were ill though?
I believe the post Kopite was referring to was my post on his day 1 activity, I called him out for sticking to posts be could answer honestly and scum and ignoring or purposely misunderstanding arguments made against him. An example of the latter:
I like Faddy's case against Vere, and while I'm not happy that turmoil's vote is on there as well I'll put my vote on him first
VOTE: Verelios
Actually, this post is giving me some giant red flags the more I look at. It piggy backs off of Faddy's case, it causes a distance between him and Turmoil if Turmoil flips scum, and it gives him an out if Vere flips town by not only having it be Faddy's idea instead of his, but also expressing concern about Turmoil being on the vote.
Only bothers to refer to the faddy piggybacking while ignoring the other points.None of those arguments would stand if I tried to make them, as I'm sure you know.
I don't have any scumreads as of yet, I'd like to have a vote down early and agreed with Faddy's points so I put a vote down on Vere is all and I'm happy to leave it there for now
To be fair that was the question I asked him, though the decision to come in answer my question pressuring him for a few specific reads and leave is his own choice.I really liked when Kopite decided to only give read on people who were scum reading him.
Sorry for not voting yesterday. I couldn't really find anyone to push and it felt like a done deal with turmoil giving up
I pointed out Brazil's WIFOM comment as being a little hypocritical too.
I like Faddy's case against Vere, and while I'm not happy that turmoil's vote is on there as well I'll put my vote on him first
VOTE: Verelios
Actually, this post is giving me some giant red flags the more I look at. It piggy backs off of Faddy's case, it causes a distance between him and Turmoil if Turmoil flips scum, and it gives him an out if Vere flips town by not only having it be Faddy's idea instead of his, but also expressing concern about Turmoil being on the vote.
None of those arguments would stand if I tried to make them, as I'm sure you know.
I don't have any scumreads as of yet, I'd like to have a vote down early and agreed with Faddy's points so I put a vote down on Vere is all and I'm happy to leave it there for now
No necessary reason to find your own justification if you agree with someones assessment. You don't seem to remember why I even voted for Vere so calling me lazy is a bit ironic.
And since when is referring to meta mean nothing? It's one of the most obvious tells of a players alignment changing when they play differently
All in all there's nothing vehemently scummy here but if I had a vigshot I needed to take right here right now I would pull the trigger on Kalor.
I was going to, but after pondering it for a bit I think I feel worse about Aeleus
VOTE: Aelues
I really liked when Kopite decided to only give read on people who were scum reading him.
To be fair that was the question I asked him, though the decision to come in answer my question pressuring him for a few specific reads and leave is his own choice.
I played differently to when we were Masons in a previous game, and I made mostly surface level comments on the game
Come on, you'd obviously take more of an interest and pay more attention to people who engage you, especially when you're townI really liked when Kopite decided to only give read on people who were scum reading him.
My first sentence "None of those arguments would stand if I tried to make them, as I'm sure you know." covers everything in that post. It's a post that's so weak that I'm certain it was just an attempt to get me to engage. Reread it properly and if you disagree I'll happily point out to you why nothing Chugg accuses me of will pass.I believe the post Kopite was referring to was my post on his day 1 activity, I called him out for sticking to posts be could answer honestly and scum and ignoring or purposely misunderstanding arguments made against him. An example of the latter:
Only bothers to refer to the faddy piggybacking while ignoring the other points.
I remain unclear about whether you're claiming the role PM does say. Were you stating your details accurately, or just baiting people with a misdirection.Even so, I put it out there that "the role PM doesn't say" because I was curious about who might take that bait.
So, reading back on Kop.
This seems a bit on the nose:
Dunno what you see here
Votes on Vere just following Faddy's case:
Correct
Chuggs with some good points here:
Bad points, none of those arguments would stand
Kop's answer is not very strong, but i can kinda see it if i squint:
Like with Aeleus I'll happily explain it if you need me to
Now this post caught my eye:
'You don't seem to remember why i even voted for Vere'. Well, because Faddy made a good case. And that was it.
What case did Faddy make? That's why I voted Vere.
Would shoot Kalor...
But votes Aeleus.
Yes? I mean the post you literally quoted and the one above that point to why I moved to Aeleus
This is also a good point:
As I've said, you'd obviously take more of an interest and pay more attention to people who engage you, especially when you're town
All in all, i could put a vote there, but i'm doing other reads before deciding.
I remain unclear about whether you're claiming the role PM does say. Were you stating your details accurately, or just baiting people with a misdirection.
This looks like a very odd reason to flip me.I would like to flip weemad today because of her filth claim, and I would join that wagon too
Baiting, but not a misdirection per se? The role PM truly doesn't explicitly say anything like "your confirmed town partner". In my opinion, it's not important, and the intention was for both to be town. I don't believe anything is afoot there, it's just not the most airtight rules wording on a role PM.
But I was curious to know who would like to keep indulging the conspiracy theory. They call it 'trolling' on this planet, I believe.