• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Spehornoob

Member
Nov 15, 2017
8,979
Anet had no set standards for community engagement, encouraged this employee to speak out on issues she was passionate about on social media, and never said anything about her twitter prior to this. Good to see you're engaged with the facts though.

There's a difference between "we appreciate when you speak out against injustice on your twitter account" and "we're okay with you attacking a fan and partner who was providing feedback in a polite manner".

She was an ass to a customer, she got fired. That female developers get shit on on twitter gives context and may even make what she did understandable, but it doesn't absolve her of responsibility.
 

Draconis

Member
Oct 28, 2017
568
Sure, if you want to ignore reporting and first-hand accounts.


First hand accounts and newspaper reports would not stand up to scrutiny were this affair brought into a court of law were the company sued for wrongful termination.

First hand accounts can be biased. Companies have employees sign documents all the time and go through training repeatedly to cover their arse in situations like these. This comes from personal experience working in multiple corporate IT environments for over 2 decades. One of the companies being so big they had their own zip code. Literally.


So I am afraid that under scrutiny in such matters those items would not be given as much weight as an employee's signature on a sheet of paper saying that as terms of their employment they agree to X policy.
 
Last edited:

oni-link

tag reference no one gets
Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,093
UK
Anet had no set standards for community engagement, encouraged this employee to speak out on issues she was passionate about on social media, and never said anything about her twitter prior to this. Good to see you're engaged with the facts though.

"Encouraging employees to speak out on issues they are passionate about" is the same as "publicly attacking their customers for no good reason"?
 

Griffith

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
5,585
The firing was excessive, in my opinion, we live in an era where some people are excessively criticised/affected for simply voicing their opinions and as much I may disagree with those opinions and their tone, I think the reaction to them is often times excessive and this is one of those cases.

I've had at least a couple of times where I vented out on Twitter, not against anyone in particular but about the frustrating circumstances of my job and no one fired me for it or made a big fuss out of it.

With that said, perhaps there are precedents we are unaware of and this a final straw rather than decisive blow. The only people who know the full circumstances of her firing are the people who work at ArenaNet and interacted with her regularly. It's not impossible that her firing may have been because of her responses or how a hate mob reacted but I find it unlikely.

If ArenaNet had a bias against her personal views, even though she's very vocal about them, I don't think they would have hired her about a year ago. That's why I don't believe her firing was caused by a hate mob.

To quote her own words from here:

"I was given no opportunity to argue my case," she told Polygon. "[ArenaNet President Mike O'Brien] spent some time insisting that developers must be friends with the company's customers, and that it was unacceptable to say that we aren't, even when we're not on the clock. He told me I'd look back and regret this, because we were doing great work and I'd ruined it. The whole thing was highly unprofessional."

The bold text is why I think she was fired. I may be wrong on the matter, but this is just where my opinion currently stands.
 
Last edited:
Oct 25, 2017
2,645
Meet your heroes but try no to think you can do their work better than them. Or think it but don't tell them directly to their faces. They may think you are an idiot.
It's amazing how you interpret "Hey the short branching dialog section in this last story mission pack you released a couple weeks ago was really cool and I think it has the potentially to be really great. Can you do more of that?" as "I can do your job better than you."

I really don't get your burning hatred of Deroir.

If you can't take the heat, don't browse child porn sites, as they say.

Man this place really is Neogaf.

Wow.
 
Last edited:

marrec

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
6,775
Two separate things to unpack there: yes, twitter is a cesspool that really needs better tools available for users to protect themselves from harrassement.

However, as I've said, I'd never heard of her until this, and on top of that for some reason she had blocked me despite not having any interactions with her.

On that basis, sympathy is in little supply here. Except for Peter Fries, he appears to be caught in the collateral damage.

You're probably on one of those poorly curated block-lists that uses an out of date system of twitter connections to automatically block a segment of users.
 

Weltall Zero

Game Developer
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
19,343
Madrid
I think the thing I've noticed most is that some people are playing teams in a manner that is completely unnecessary to the situation between Deroir and Jessica.

It can be mutually true that Deroir was well intentioned but out of his depth and came off as patronizing and that Jessica reacted in an unnecessarily hyperbolic manner to his comments.

There is no need to create some grand narrative that ascribes motives that pretty clearly weren't there.

It can also be true that she overreacted in this specific instance AND that it was unreasonable for Arenanet to fire her and that women face unfair questioning of their competency.

All of this can be true at the same time.

The real guilty parties of this story are the hate mob and arenanet for being so quick to capitulate.

This is approximately my view indeed. Or to sum it up:
- Deroir was naive and (as most men are) ignorant of the implications of his comments.
- Price should have kept better composture in a public account linked to her job (the best case scenario would have been to ignore him). Yet she's human and has limits and gets angry like everyone else.
- ArenaNet were entirely unreasonable on firing her because of the whole thing, instead of talking things with her (or better yet, her and Deroir). This could have ended in better mutual understanding and awareness of what women have to deal with day to day at work and outside; instead they polarized it even further and legitimized the hate mob.

I think the party that comes out as looking the worst here is ArenaNet. And the GG hate mobs of course, but that's kind of "making water wet".
 

Deleted member 5596

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,747
It's amazing how you interpret "Hey the short branching dialog section in this last story mission pack you released a couple weeks ago was really cool and I think it has the potentially to be really great. Can you do more of that?" as "I can do your job better than you."

I really don't get your burning hatred of Deroir.

More like "I believe dialogue choices don't work, so I worked very hard to work around them, here's how I did it" then "That's cool thing you said, although I didn't read it lol, hey do more dialogue choices that's how you fix the narrative in your game"

Also "burning hatred" lmao
 

Bernd Lauert

Banned
May 27, 2018
1,812
A simple "My bad but I have to deal with this all the time" would have been sufficient. Instead she doubled down on her BS and got fired. No body destroyed her lively hood, she can still work elsewhere if they are more acceptable to shitting on customers.

And then she tripled down and publically shat on her ex-employer after she got fired.
 

marrec

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
6,775
User warned: personal attacks
More like "I believe dialogue choices don't work, so I worked very hard to work around them, here's how I did it" then "That's cool thing you said, although I didn't read it lol, hey do more dialogue choices that's how you fix the narrative in your game"

Also "burning hatred" lmao

Your desperate attempt to ascribe negative intentions that have no evidence of existing to his interaction with Price is, at this point, clearly pathological.

The summaries you have created are for a conversation that only exists in your head as a way to absolve yourself of any guilt for pillorying Deroir when there is no need. We don't need the initial interaction to have any added subtext.
 

Xenon

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,266
I'm not talking about the guy she responded to. Yes, she shouldn't have responded to him like that. I'm talking about the hate mob that had it out for her.

But as far as her company goes, there is not much they can do since they were firing her. From what I read about her history she has they were willing to take her in so they must have been sympathetic to her and the hate she has received previously. She took things too far and they let her go. It would be crazy for them to get involved in a twitter war now. As far as her co worker getting canned, speaking on company business in a public forum is a big no-no. You don't do it, period. I haven't seen the tweet but if it was directed at ArenaNet or its customers and not just in support Jessica then he messed up.
 

Dizagaox

Banned
Feb 26, 2018
1,076
London
Can anyone with any legal knowledge be able to say if she has a good case for wrongful dismissal?
Depends on her contract. It looks like she signed one that said she could be fired at any time if she embarrassed the company (which is a fairly common contract stipulation now) and that's that. They didn't need to give her a warning to fire her.

She can still sue, but there's little chance it'll get to court. Similar employee disputes are usually dismissed or at best arbitrated. Her argument will be seen as "I was a bad person on Twitter before this incident, and they knew I was a bad person on Twitter when they hired me, so why did they fire me for being a bad person on Twitter."
 

Giant Panda

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,689
there is actually something you can do

you can vote for, support and campaign for politicians that would fight for rudimentary labour rights, so that companies DON'T have the right to instantly fire someone for any reason

i've said it before ITT, but i'll say it again, the power imbalance between employers and employees in america is baffling to many of us europeans
Are you suggesting companies shouldn't have the ability to fire people for misuse of social media?
 

Dizagaox

Banned
Feb 26, 2018
1,076
London
On a more positive note, she shouldn't have any difficulty finding a new job. She'll probably have to deactivate her public social media or something, but she has talent and passion. That still goes a long way.
 

TheModestGun

Banned
Dec 5, 2017
3,781
More like "I believe dialogue choices don't work, so I worked very hard to work around them, here's how I did it" then "That's cool thing you said, although I didn't read it lol, hey do more dialogue choices that's how you fix the narrative in your game"

Also "burning hatred" lmao
Why are you even arguing speculative intentions and readings of this situation? This is irrelevant to the larger problem. ArenaNet and the hate mob are to blame. Deroir is at worst naive.
 

Vex

Member
Oct 25, 2017
22,213
My opinion on this:

She shouldn't have been fired without any warning. Unacceptable. Why didn't they sit her down and review their company's policy to her? Why wasn't there a write up of some sort first? Most companies will go through a process before firing someone (most legit companies anyway). No re-training? No nothing? I would have had them point out exactly where the company policy says "be nice to every customer on twitter". If they couldn't, the only thing that would've come out of my mouth during the "the meeting" would have been "lawyer". Even if they could... they fired her? Really?

It just seems like they were in a rush to get her out of the door. That's not a good look for ArenaNET.

Now -- on the original comment on twitter she made:

Phew. I guess this is a symptom of a larger issue in the gaming industry today. She had a reaction -- a pretty bad reaction to a twitter comment. I don't see that the "customer" was trying to berate her. So I am wondering if she is just used to getting shit all the time. Judging by the OP, it seems she has received harassment before. Not uncommon. We know this. I just can't get over the fact that we are at a point where if anyone criticizes your work there just has to be some sort of agenda attached to it rather than genuine criticism. This is sad how everyone is always so amped up nowadays. What a mess.

TLDR; she shouldn't have been fired. This whole situation is a clusterfuck.
 

MisterBear

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Nov 1, 2017
656
Saying it has nothing to do with gender is missing the point, the situation Price was and is still in goes beyond what happened here and absolutely has everything to do with her gender. Price had a hate mob after her from day 1 over her gender that have actively harassed her and employers she worked for. ANet went about it in a way that has only emboldened said hate group, and it is absolutely no surprise that a lot of female game developers have come out on twitter to post messages their employers have been getting since Price was fired, and even an automated message that has been circulating that had a '%femalename' error.
I don't understand this logic, so you think she deserves immunity from these types of things because she represented something in feminism? Shouldn't that just have made her more accountable for what she says on the internet, if so many eyes were on her waiting for her to screw up? Doesn't seem like she was being overly careful.

Is the solution that, if there is a female dev in a game company and she has experienced harassment from gamers she deserves extra privledges and immunities? What about the guy that was also fired? Was that ok?
 

Luckydog

Attempting to circumvent a ban with an alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
636
USA
There's no "perceived" about it. It was a slight. He may not have been doing it maliciously, but his comments were still a slight, and an example of, shock, an actual issue facing women in the industry. Meaning the exact thing that they were blowing smoke about being important for their employees to discuss.

It is the definition of "perceived". She saw it as one, and he did not. An ACTUAL slight is "You suck, I can't believe you didnt think of this other option". Clear and defined. You may expect him to see it that way but in reality its not. I totally understand someone snapping here or there if they have to hear BS all day. But you clear your head, say "my bad" and move on. Not continue to pile on the guy.
 

Luckydog

Attempting to circumvent a ban with an alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
636
USA
And then she tripled down and publically shat on her ex-employer after she got fired.

Exactly. Everyone is wrong but her in her mind. Perhaps a bit of perspective is needed. I'm sure she has to deal with REAL issues in the gaming industry, but it doesnt give you license to shit on whoever you want whenever you want.
 
OP
OP
hydrophilic attack

hydrophilic attack

Corrupted by Vengeance
Member
Oct 25, 2017
21,565
Sweden
Are you suggesting companies shouldn't have the ability to fire people for misuse of social media?
I mean, I personally like that we can get racists fired for being publicly racist.
i find that the benefits of stringent employee protection laws (you can't find excuses to fire someone over petty personal disagreements, you can't intimidate employees from unionization, you can't lose your livelyhood for pissing the wrong person off on twitter, you can't pressure people into working overtime or not using their contractual and legislated entitlements like paid vacation or parental leave, you don't create incentives for asshats to start harassment campaigns by showing those people that they can indeed get what they want and get someone fired) heavily outweigh the positives of lax employee protection laws (higher dividends to shareholders and by extension pension funds, sometimes a twitter racist gets fired) but that's just me

(also, since we have stronger hate speech limitations in free speech laws than the US does, twitter racism may actually get someone fired even with our stronger employee protections if it's sufficiently severe)
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 5596

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,747
Why are you even arguing speculative intentions and readings of this situation. This is irrelevant to the larger problem. ArenaNet and the hate mob are to blame. Deroir is at worst naive.

Because it's how started and should be reviewed that ArenaNet believes that customers has the right to interact with their devs even when they have, naive and polite but ultimately unrespectful feedback, when they don't ask it or want it or is even related to what they are posting. It's not absolving Price of any wrongdoings. neither is putting all the blame on Deroir, it's this idea that customers can self insert their own feedback on personal devs twitters, to a female dev nonetheless and think they deserve that they humour them, no matter how baseless, unrespectful or even mainsplaining can come across under politeness and naive curtains. Is that those suposed rights customers take from granted and supposed obliged "professionalism" workers they have to act upon, that performace in you work is not enough, specially female devs since they are the target of harassment and this like Deroir comments on a daily basis.

It sends an awful message, female devs are even more defenseless, now they can't be outspoken about these attitudes because their companies might stick with the users no matter what. Sexists and GG (not even GG probably inside the same communitty are people sexists) are latching about this idea: "I was just giving her feedback" "She shouldn't be that outspoken about these issues, because they don't represent reality blabla". As I said, naivity and politenes aren't excuse for badly comments, mansplaining is something that runs deeply in our society, a lot of the time is just subsconcious, I'm pretty sure Deroir didn't mean the comment to be that way, but it did and he didn't realized, because is deeply ingrained in our education, our media and the society. Is dissapointing that what he learned out of this was: Devs should humour us about our "feedback".

Larger problems are usually come from many minor problems. If Price wasn't a female dev, if mansplaining wasn't a daily happening for a lot of females, if Deroir took another approach to Price thread (she did responded nicely to other comments, of course those comments were very different). All those things are interconnected, ArenaNet is to blame, but of what? This is what happened, this is what ArenaNet stands for and this is the shockwave of their actions.


So basically what I want to say is: "Actually, is about customer service in gaming"
 
Oct 25, 2017
2,645
More like "I believe dialogue choices don't work, so I worked very hard to work around them, here's how I did it" then "That's cool thing you said, although I didn't read it lol, hey do more dialogue choices that's how you fix the narrative in your game"

Also "burning hatred" lmao
Your primary focus in this and the other large thread we had about Price has been to vilify Deroir. Across multiple threads you've; ascribed hidden malicious motives to him and promoted others who did the same, said he didn't deserve to call himself a feminist, called him stupid, said he was playing "the victim card", called him an asshat multiple times across multiple threads, accused him of deliberately ordering his viewers to attack Price, when pointed out he did no such thing you back pedaled and said he did it deliberately while trying to make himself look like he wasn't doing it, ranted about how unfair it was for his audience to attack her despite her having a much bigger audience to rally and completely ignored her much larger audience dog piling onto Deroir when she very publicly put him on blast on her larger platform, said it was his fault she was fired. I can go on.

And I can back all of these up with direct links to your posts though I don't think mods appreciate people doing that sort of thing.

Regardless of your exact motivations for being in these threads, regardless of how you feel about Price being treated unfairly the very clear majority of your posts in here and the previous thread about the Kotaku article have just been about tearing Deroir down.
 
Last edited:

Fanta

Member
May 27, 2018
508
I don't understand this logic, so you think she deserves immunity from these types of things because she represented something in feminism? Shouldn't that just have made her more accountable for what she says on the internet, if so many eyes were on her waiting for her to screw up? Doesn't seem like she was being overly careful.

Is the solution that, if there is a female dev in a game company and she has experienced harassment from gamers she deserves extra privledges and immunities? What about the guy that was also fired? Was that ok?

I don't understand what point you're trying to make here, I didn't say anything about whether what she did was right or wrong, I was pointing out that there's a much larger problem happening here beyond what just happened. The fact is that multiple female developers came out publically to show what's been happening to them and connecting it to ANet emboldening a hate group because they now feel their actions are valid and can go after any dev now.

After all is said and done, a streamer got a nasty comment that will mean nothing to him and he'll carry on doing what he does, a company will brush it under the rug and forget, and a female employee is out of a job with a hate group after her who now feels validated in their actions and a male employee out of the job for daring to stand up for said employee.
 

MisterBear

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Nov 1, 2017
656
My opinion on this:

She shouldn't have been fired without any warning. Unacceptable. Why didn't they sit her down and review their company's policy to her? Why wasn't there a write up of some sort first? Most companies will go through a process before firing someone (most legit companies anyway). No re-training? No nothing? I would have had them point out exactly where the company policy says "be nice to every customer on twitter". If they couldn't, the only thing that would've come out of my mouth during the "the meeting" would have been "lawyer". Even if they could... they fired her? Really?

It just seems like they were in a rush to get her out of the door. That's not a good look for ArenaNET.

Now -- on the original comment on twitter she made:

Phew. I guess this is a symptom of a larger issue in the gaming industry today. She had a reaction -- a pretty bad reaction to a twitter comment. I don't see that the "customer" was trying to berate her. So I am wondering if she is just used to getting shit all the time. Judging by the OP, it seems she has received harassment before. Not uncommon. We know this. I just can't get over the fact that we are at a point where if anyone criticizes your work there just has to be some sort of agenda attached to it rather than genuine criticism. This is sad how everyone is always so amped up nowadays. What a mess.

TLDR; she shouldn't have been fired. This whole situation is a clusterfuck.
How do you know the company didn't do any of this or have problems with her in the past though?
 

Vex

Member
Oct 25, 2017
22,213
How do you know the company didn't do any of this or have problems with her in the past though?
I don't claim to know exactly what happened. Which is why the first half of my post was set up as questions. All I know is what you know. I'm ASKING why weren't these things done. If they were...? Then great. If not, it looks bad.


Without knowing what happened exactly, all we have to go off of is what was said:

Jessica says there was "no warning".
ArenaNET did not comment on any prior issues with Jessica.

This does not look good. But again, I do not know.
 
Last edited:

Bansai

Teyvat Traveler
Member
Oct 28, 2017
11,399
Controversial firing? Not in my opinion, if anything, the case was pretty clear cut for me.

Jessica certainly didn't deserve the shit she got after the whole shebang happened, but she definitely deserved to get fired for her completely unprofessional conduct (not her first even and probably not last) to a member of the community that approached her with respect and nothing but good intentions.

It sucks that female devs are under extra pressure from weirdos who think they now better, but you can't take that out on somebody who actually tried to have a normal discussion with you and make it somehow about a gender issue.
 

Deleted member 36767

User requested account closure
Banned
Dec 24, 2017
96
Chicago
I don't claim to know exactly what happened. Which is why the first half of my post was set up as questions. All I know is what you know. I'm ASKING why weren't these things done. If they were...? Then great. If not, it looks bad.


Without knowing what happened exactly, all we have to go off of is what was said:

Jessica says there was "no warning".
ArenaNET did not comment on any prior issues with Jessica.

This does not look good. But again, I do not know.


I think if you treat someone the way she did you should expect the possibility of being fired. That's common sense. Even if this company gave her no warnings, she is not entitled to any under these circumstances.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
If this is the company you want to be, that's OK. But if that's the case, then you shouldn't represent your company this way:

From The Verge's article, linked in the OP:

From the Polygon article, linked in the OP:

You can be the company with the social media policy that your devs keep quiet. If they'd presented themselves that way during the interview, she would have just moved on and interviewed elsewhere. Instead, they blew a lot of smoke about how they appreciated employees being engaged in talking about social issues and talking about and pushing against the ugly side of the industry, up until the point that they were actually tested on those values, at which point they revealed that all that rhetoric was totally empty.

That reads as if they'd be okay with her talking about actual abuse and issues.

She didn't do that here. She targeted someone who was innocent and then refused to back down/apologize.

I'm not entirely sure why that distinction is troubling many in here. Who she quoted and blasted in public wasn't one of the trolls or assholes you're portraying to me above as being the kinds of cretins the employer supposedly said were okay to talk about.

I mean she's been with them how long and has been acting on her Twitter as she wants all that time? The issue here is refusing to apologize and back down when in the wrong.
 
Last edited:

mutantmagnet

Member
Oct 28, 2017
12,401
Why do professionals, who aren't movie or music stars, need a twitter account?

It is a potential career land mine with no apparent reward even at the best of times.

The nature of the platform makes it super easy to make short, un-nuanced, remarks that land you in trouble.
Professionals go to conventions too. It is a simple tool for coordination with people not in your contacts list.
 

Deleted member 36767

User requested account closure
Banned
Dec 24, 2017
96
Chicago
It is unacceptable based off of what was said. You don't question this? Do you not think it is weird to fire someone so quickly? As an employer, are you that prepared to let go of talent that fast (without any warning)?


No, it's not odd to get rid of talent so fast. It happens all the time. No one is irreplaceable- just look at Poppa Johns founder who had to step down for using certain language before he was actually fired.
 

Budi

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,896
Finland
That reads as if they'd be okay with her talking about actual abuse and issues.

She didn't do that here. She targeted someone who was innocent and then refused to back down/apologize.
It's quite sad how this has affected Deroir too and will probably affect in future as now he is labeled by some as "Gator-type". I saw this in another thread, somebody has read some hot Twitter takes and decided that the guy is Gamergater. This shit spreads like a wildfire and can tarnish people forever as it has before. Somebody says something on Twitter so now it must be the truth and people really don't care to dig any deeper to get full story/context. It saddens me.
 
Nov 1, 2017
851
It is unacceptable based off of what was said. You don't question this? Do you not think it is weird to fire someone so quickly? As an employer, are you that prepared to let go of talent that fast (without any warning)?
Again, you are absolutely certain that there was no warning despite admittedly not knowing what happened.

And no, I don't think it's weird to fire someone for berating and sicking their followers on a customer. Personally I would have given her a warning, but I also don't know how many warnings she's had in the past, but I certainly would have warned her over her celebration of Total Biscuit dying as well so that would make this the second warning for me if I were her boss so she would be fired. And I certainly wouldn't come out with a laundry list of "In January she did this, and then in March she did that, then in July she did that..." to justify my position to the citizens of the internet.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
It's quite sad how this has affected Deroir too and will probably affect in future as now he is labeled by some as "Gator-type" (also the mob Price ushered on him is quite nasty). I saw this in another thread, somebody has read some hot Twitter takes and decided that the guy is Gamergater. This shit spreads like a wildfire and can tarnish people forever as it has before. Somebody says something on Twitter so now it must be the truth and people really don't care to dig any deeper to get full story/context. It saddens me.

Well, if you're not being intellectually dishonest you'll quickly see he's not a gamergate person. I'm sure his twitter account has been thoroughly examined by now.

It's not really fair to say because he was incorrectly publicly hung out to dry is for the greater good because a whole load of other guys are shitheels. It matters what he is individually like and that is why an employer won't like what appears to be a decent enough person being on the receiving end of being called sexist and an asshole or asshat.

If you're going to hang people out to dry in public you have to go after the correct people. Then if you make a mistake you're probably going to have to apologize if you're operating in a capacity under an employer. Ymmv but the vast majority of us everyday employees will not get away with publicly hanging someone out who didn't do anything wrong. How you correct that mistake could be tied directly to the severity of any disciplinary action.

I probably wouldn't have fired her, but I would have been expecting a public retraction and a bit of humility to accept while many people on Twitter are shitheels, you've just fired off at someone who actually isn't. Go and apologize. I guess though if she doubles down and refuses to apologize it does begin to frustrate an employer.
 
Last edited:

Einherjer

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,924
Germany
On a more positive note, she shouldn't have any difficulty finding a new job. She'll probably have to deactivate her public social media or something, but she has talent and passion. That still goes a long way.

Yeah i'm sure company's are lining up to hire her now that she's busy shitting on her previous employer on social media after this whole episode...
 

Budi

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,896
Finland
Well, if you're not being intellectually dishonest you'll quickly see he's not a gamergate person. I'm sure his twitter account has been thoroughly examined by now.
Sure I think it's easy to see if one just looks into it, but as I said thats not how it always works. People don't go for the source, they take second hand information and opinions as the truth and as full story. To bring up Cliffy B again and the narrative how he hates XBOX is well alive and still spreading when people talk about him. There's popular Youtube videos that show him saying "I hate the Xbox" then cutting to another clip, leaving out the rest where he says that he don't and is joking while implying that's the accusation he gets from Xbox fans. How many looks up the original interview to see rest of his thought or the context where it was said. Similarly I believe that many don't go back to read this original convo but just see someone else saying that "Gamergater mansplained and harassed Price and she got fired for that". And even less people are looking into Deroir more, his history and if there's any reason to believe this would be the case. But they still hold a belief that he's an asshat gator.
 
Last edited:

mutantmagnet

Member
Oct 28, 2017
12,401
So, in your view, what should a female game developer on Twitter do if she wants to talk about her work in one of the places where many game devs talk about her work in a way that will allow it to be interacted with by people she trusts and looks up too, while not getting spammed with helpful messages about how to do her job?
This is rich. Devs get tweets from fans all the time. What do you think that Kamiya discussion surrounding your post is about?
 

HerrSchiller

Member
Apr 26, 2018
44
User Banned (2 Weeks): Downplaying the history and impact of harassment campaigns + the experiences of women on social media, account still in the junior phase.
After her last tweets she just seems like a child who just can't admit any wrongdoing even though she knows that she fucked up. But no, obviously everyone else is at fault. Throwing gender issues in the mix and playing the victim. Hilarious.
 

Vex

Member
Oct 25, 2017
22,213
Again, you are absolutely certain that there was no warning despite admittedly not knowing what happened.
No.

Personally I would have given her a warning, but I also don't know how many warnings she's had in the past, but I certainly would have warned her over her celebration of Total Biscuit dying as well so that would make this the second warning for me if I were her boss so she would be fired.
We're on the same page here. Almost word for word... that's pretty much it.

And I certainly wouldn't come out with a laundry list of "In January she did this, and then in March she did that, then in July she did that..." to justify my position to the citizens of the internet.
You dont have to say it like that, but a bit more transparency would have gone a loooong way. I mean, the cat is already out of the bag. The entire internet is already all over this incident. There's nothing private about this now if that's what you're implying.
 
Jun 22, 2018
86
For all the headlines over the years about how the games industry has finally grown up, the fact that there's even a debate about whether the firing was justified demonstrates how immature the industry can be. In any other line of business, an employee who lashes out at customers and calls them "asshats" is getting fired in a heartbeat, and we're not here having this conversation. When you speak out on social media, as an employee of a company, and even moreso when you're discussing said company's product, you're representing your employer and are expected to act in a way reflective of that. This is why companies have social media and LinkedIn policies.

But because it's gaming, we want to hold behavior to a lower standard, treat her with kids gloves, and let her off with a written warning for calling the very people keeping the lights on in the building "asshats"?

That's not how the real world works.

I've had some terrible employees over the years, and I've given many of them written warnings. Perpetually late for work? Written warning. Routinely rude to coworkers? Written warning. Poor quality of work? Written the warning. But the only employee I've ever had to fire without warning was an employee who personally attacked a client. In business, you live and die by the strength and reputation of your brand, and if someone is putting that at risk, you have to cut the cord to protect the rest of the employees.

Sucks for her, but it's a positive decision for everyone else whose paychecks are put at risk when a rogue employee starts demeaning the customer.

Deeply sorry for anything she's had to endure in her career because of her gender - that's never acceptable - but two wrongs don't make a right.

That said, I think stories like this - damage aside - are really good for society. As the #MeToo movement has taught us, terrible people have gotten away with a lot of terrible things and we need to hold them accountable. But we also need to find the right equilibrium where all people - women, men, gays, straights, blacks, whites - are treated respectfully and equally without needing to give free passes to, or hold anything against, entire groups of people because of specific offenses by the worst of their kind.

Will take 1,000 more situations like this happening to find the right calibration, but as #MeToo and Papa John and everything else have taught us, we continue to move in the right direction.

And that's a good thing.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
Sure I think it's easy to see if one just looks into it, but as I said thats not how it always works. People don't go for the source, they take second hand information and opinions as the truth and as full story. To bring up Cliffy B again and the narrative how he hates XBOX is well alive and still spreading when people talk about him, there's popular Youtube videos that show him saying "I hate the Xbox" then cutting to another clip, leaving out the rest where he says that he don't and is joking while implying that's the accusation he gets from Xbox fans. How many looks up the original interview to see rest of his thought or the context where it was said. Similarly I believe that many don't go back to read this original convo but just see someone else saying that "Gamergater mansplained and harassed Price and she got fired for that". And even less people are looking into Deroir more, his history and if there's any reason to believe this would be the case. But they still hold a believe that he's an asshat gator.

That's a larger problem in general with humanity. Just reading headlines or simply believing something if it sounds plausible.

Not much you can do about that other than correcting misinformation and telling people to have some self-respect and use their eyes, ears and brain to properly research and read/listen.

Not everything is black/white either, but this is one of those situations you really need to do some twisting and projecting to pass Deroir off as some woman hating abusive mouthpiece deserving of a public dressing down.
 

Deleted member 16657

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
10,198
There are so many things being discussed here.
  • Were Deroir's comments condescending or rude? Was it wrong for Deroir to comment on Price's feed?
  • Were Deroir's comments sexist or mansplaining?
  • Were Price's comments on TotalBiscuit's death acceptable?
  • Did Price deserve to be fired for her comments?
  • Did Fries deserve to be fired?
  • Should companies be allowed to fire employees based on how they act to customers on social media, off the clock?
Personally I think that the only relevant questions are "Did Price deserve to be fired for her comments?" and the last one which seems to have created an interesting cultural divide. It seems that most folks in America are aware and accept that Price's actions would get her fired from most companies, while others are arguing that companies shouldn't have the right to fire her over comments on her personal feed.
 

Budi

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,896
Finland
Personally I think that the only relevant questions are "Did Price deserve to be fired for her comments?" and the last one which seems to have created an interesting cultural divide. It seems that most folks in America are aware and accept that Price's actions would get her fired from most companies, while others are arguing that companies shouldn't have the right to fire her over comments on her personal feed.
I'm not American but I've seen how it works, I wouldn't have fired her but it's not up to me and I don't see the firing to be unjustified. Looks that it works like intended. I think it's fair to let companies handle these things as they see fit, as long as it's legal.

There was just a case in Finland actually where a big jazz festival swiftly fired it's newly appointed boss for his participation in Christian organization (7 years ago) that had ran a campaign that homosexuality could be cured. (Media digged this up) He tried to explain that his comments were misinterpreted at the time (comparing drug addiction to homosexuality) and everyone should be free to define their own sexuality and everyone should be accepted. Also claimed that the organization participated in societal discussion defending tolerance and the right for an invidual to express their opinions. But that didn't save him, he was fired before the job even started. I thought that was absolutely fine too, even though he hasn't talked on behalf of the festival organization. Though different situation from this because of his position comparing to these devs and the severity of his old comments compared to this case.
 
Last edited:

Kinthey

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
22,485
It's quite sad how this has affected Deroir too and will probably affect in future as now he is labeled by some as "Gator-type". I saw this in another thread, somebody has read some hot Twitter takes and decided that the guy is Gamergater. This shit spreads like a wildfire and can tarnish people forever as it has before. Somebody says something on Twitter so now it must be the truth and people really don't care to dig any deeper to get full story/context. It saddens me.
Yeah, it sucks how the false timeline from that beagel twitter dude has spread.