Beto being the win that gives the Democratic party the majority would be a storybook ending for the 2018 election. I can't imagine a victory that would be more gratifying short of a woman destroying Trump in the 2020 election.
The ME GOP gubernatorial candidate settled a sex discrimination lawsuit.
Hello, Governor Mills and a trifecta (we only need one seat in the state senate). This will play especially badly after Sue's antics last week.
What is in the fucking water up there?
I just can't wrap my head around why people still vote for Ted Cruz. It's fucking mind boggling. Everyone hates him from all sides, who the fuck is voting for him?
The problem is we have five Democrats running in states that both Romney and Trump won (and four are Bush-Bush-McCain too, Donnelly of Indiana being the only exception as Obama barely won it in 08). Manchin, for example, is running in West Virginia which voted for Trump by 42 points. The other four (Indiana, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota) also voted for Trump by double digits.Sure, but aren't a number of districts in red states also at risk of flipping even though we don't need them?
Nah, fuck it, I'm not even questioning this, you're almost surely right. Sometimes, I look at the data and the reports and the predictions and lose sight of the simple explanations.
I just can't wrap my head around why people still vote for Ted Cruz. It's fucking mind boggling. Everyone hates him from all sides, who the fuck is voting for him?
Hillary would've won Arizona without the Comey letter or at least come within a millimeter. Obama also performed well there in 2012. It's not a red state anymore.As for the House districts in red states, they're usually not nearly as red as the state at large. AZ-2 and KS-3 for example are districts that Clinton won, even though the state as a whole voted Republican.
Florida doesn't deserve to be a southern stateMaine is really a state that needs to be relocated down south. It can attach to Florida and serve as the ball sack.
THANK YOU! First time I heard that tune it sounded like the Top Gun theme to the point I thought it had to be intentional.
I just can't wrap my head around why people still vote for Ted Cruz. It's fucking mind boggling. Everyone hates him from all sides, who the fuck is voting for him?
Yeah I don't want to just straight-up unskew things, but Nevada polling has always been really off in the Republicans' favor.Using RCP averages:
2004: Bush up 6.3 in polling, wins by 2.5.
2008: Obama lead by 6.5 in polling, wins by 12.5.
2010: Harry Reid was behind by 2.7 in the polling by election day. He won by 5.6.
2012: Obama leads polling by 2.8, wins by 6.7. Heller up 4, wins by 1.2.
(there weren't any senate races in 2014, and we kind of surrendered the governorship this year which was speculated to be the reason the Reid machine failed to save Ross Miller at least.)
2016: Clinton behind by 0.8, wins by 2.4. Masto ahead by 1.8, wins by 2.4.
I'm not concerned yet.
Using RCP averages:
2004: Bush up 6.3 in polling, wins by 2.5.
2008: Obama lead by 6.5 in polling, wins by 12.5.
2010: Harry Reid was behind by 2.7 in the polling by election day. He won by 5.6.
2012: Obama leads polling by 2.8, wins by 6.7. Heller up 4, wins by 1.2.
(there weren't any senate races in 2014, and we kind of surrendered the governorship this year which was speculated to be the reason the Reid machine failed to save Ross Miller at least.)
2016: Clinton behind by 0.8, wins by 2.4. Masto ahead by 1.8, wins by 2.4.
I'm not concerned yet.
I agree. Even 55-45 would be the best performance for a Democratic candidate in over twenty years, but I think it'll be slightly closer.I hope something similar happens in Texas. I still highly doubt that Beto will win, but he won't lose by 9 points either. I think the margin of defeat is going to be around 4 points.
Why would his Republican colleagues hate him? He already built his brand and is now a reliable asset who always votes in lockstep with the rest of his party. I think the whole "even Republicans hate Ted Cruz!" thing was overstated to the benefit of the brand he was trying to build for himself.I just can't wrap my head around why people still vote for Ted Cruz. It's fucking mind boggling. Everyone hates him from all sides, who the fuck is voting for him?
I'd say happy because we're not the ones whose party rests on those hateful beliefs.
It is sad, though. Anywhere else, an R+13 seat with an incumbent wouldn't be competitive unless there were a scandal.
I just can't wrap my head around why people still vote for Ted Cruz. It's fucking mind boggling. Everyone hates him from all sides, who the fuck is voting for him?
I guess either I missed this here due to it being posted by someone I have blocked or it just wasn't posted here:
https://www.resetera.com/threads/mi...rke-taking-half-for-his-pac-by-default.74308/
That's pretty sleazy.
I agree. Even 55-45 would be the best performance for a Democratic candidate in over twenty years, but I think it'll be slightly closer.
A margin of less than ten points is going to help us so much downballot, especially in suburban districts like TX-07 and 32, where Beto is going to win and could help get our candidates across the finish line.
They'd vote for any R over an evil, baby-killing Dem. That's how Mitch McConnell keeps winning despite having the lowest approval rating of any Senator.I just can't wrap my head around why people still vote for Ted Cruz. It's fucking mind boggling. Everyone hates him from all sides, who the fuck is voting for him?
There is no fear motivating the youth vote like there are other groups, though...
If young voters were scare shitless they'd vote.
Didn't know that Kamala did that. And I'm not sure what hers looked like but I could have thought it was sleazy.The fight PAC logo is giant on the donate page and it clearly lays out what you are donating too. It's only sleazy if you assume people can't read. Kamala did the exact same thing this year but I don't see anyone making a thread about it and calling her sleazy.
You have to keep in mind that in this case, what the entire country thinks of him doesn't matter. Only people in Texas are voting for him, and Texas has a strong evangelical contingent that is very supportive of Cruz.I just can't wrap my head around why people still vote for Ted Cruz. It's fucking mind boggling. Everyone hates him from all sides, who the fuck is voting for him?
People asking about what Beto is going to spend that money on: TV ads.
Local stations are around 2k+ for 30 seconds.
National is around 150k for 30 seconds.
Those millions can be drained quickly!
Beto's looking so young helps. I can't believe he's 46! He's as old as Bill Clinton when Bill was elected president!
McConnell's not popular in Kentucky. Again, he has the lowest approval rating of any Senator. But they will vote for literally ANYONE with an R after their name over a stinking Dem.You have to keep in mind that in this case, what the entire country thinks of him doesn't matter. Only people in Texas are voting for him, and Texas has a strong evangelical contingent that is very supportive of Cruz.
It's the same thing with McConnell: he is maybe the most hated senator ever, even among the GOP, but he's still popular in Kentucky. And being popular in Kentucky is all that matters because those are the only people who actually vote for him.
Fair point. I knew McConnell was super unpopular nationally but I thought he was still popular locally, turns out I was wrong.McConnell's not popular in Kentucky. Again, he has the lowest approval rating of any Senator. But they will vote for literally ANYONE with an R after their name over a stinking Dem.
Flake is flaking out as the second least popular Senator because he actually had a decent chance of losing if he ran, as AZ is no longer red.
I do agree re: evangelicals and Cruz though. My single issue voter relatives (who are Catholic but w/e) backed Cruz in the primaries.
I'm going to agree that TV advertising is a money sink with diminishing returns.
The people Beto needs to be turning out (millennials, Hispanics) are watching less and less broadcast television by the day. I see television ads exactly once a week during NFL games and no other time.
Bombarding baby boomers watching CBS with even MORE ads isn't going to do what he needs.
Beto doesn't believe in tv ads either. He's gone on record saying this, but he has to run some to get to rural older people.I'm going to agree that TV advertising is a money sink with diminishing returns.
The people Beto needs to be turning out (millennials, Hispanics) are watching less and less broadcast television by the day. I see television ads exactly once a week during NFL games and no other time.
Bombarding baby boomers watching CBS with even MORE ads isn't going to do what he needs.
@kylegriffin1
Steven Mnuchin told CNBC that Saudi Arabia has "been a very good partner," and that he still plans on attending the Saudi Future Investment Initiative conference despite the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi. https://www.axios.com/steve-mnuchin-saudi-arabia-conference-jamal-khashoggi-1049bec7-7cd6-4f1d-a16b-ca3a2c885c42.html …
12:35 PM - Oct 12, 2018