.A media company with a bro-y edgelord vibe having this kind of thing going on is the least surprising thing of the week.
.A media company with a bro-y edgelord vibe having this kind of thing going on is the least surprising thing of the week.
Sunderland, yes.Didn't vice have the dude that was best buddies with Milo over their women's section?
A film Twitter personality who also writes for LA Weekly.
A media company with a bro-y edgelord vibe having this kind of thing going on is the least surprising thing of the week.
By winter 2015, Barghouty says her complaints about Larsen had reached Nancy Ashbrooke, Vice's global director of human resources, who had claimed months earlier in a statement to the Columbia Journalism Review that sexual harassment wasn't an issue for the company.
"We haven't had any cases of sexual harassment to deal with," Ashbrooke wrote. (Ashbrooke was vice president of human resources at Harvey Weinstein's Miramax Films from 1991 to 2000, according to her LinkedIn page, a time when the now-disgraced producer was paying out hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal settlements to squash allegations of sexual harassment and unwanted sexual contact by employees and actresses.)
Sorry, I shouldn't take shots without backing it up. I know. Let's just say I'm not a fan of the way he's handled a few of the industry's controversies over the years, trying to play both sides of the fence.
Why would you think any industry is 'safe'? The whole issue is that the kinds of metrics by which we judge people to be "good" or at least "not a sexual predator" are irrelevant at best.
That's a really mild way to put it, considering the man is factually sexist, transphobic and antisemitic.
Holy shit hahahah. Incredible way to destroy someone's credibility without a hint of sass or snark. I wish I had this talent.
Why are we interested in Patrick Klepek and Austin Walker's takes?
I'd rather hear Danielle Riendeau and Danika Harrod's thoughts on this.
Abiding sex pests and harassers in your own backyard because you get paid by them kind of sabotages their whole identity as a media outlet.Yeah. After covering Louis CK, IGN and the old forum,it will be interesting to see how they react. It will be very disappointing if they fall in line with the corporate message, but also kind of understandable since it's their livelihood. But it would sure take away the bite from their rhetoric.
Abiding sex pests and harassers in your own backyard because you get paid by them kind of sabotages their whole identity as a media outlet.
I don't think this will stop me from watching those highly entertaining docu-films they do. Show me a workplace without sexual harassment and I will show you a liar.
it's the fucked up logic of 'this happens everywhere so it's pointless to take a stand against any specific instance'
After all of Austin and Patrick's moralizing on Twitter about many non-video game subjects they would be huge fucking hypocrites to be silent about this.
I agree with this. I think they will thoughIf waypoint want to have any credibility with respect to their message, they have to cover this, and even protest this. If not, then they have no leg to stand on.
I don't think this will stop me from watching those highly entertaining docu-films they do. Show me a workplace without sexual harassment and I will show you a liar.
Vice frequently seemed a bit too Bill Maherish for my tastes. They also have lots of great content, but there is something off.
I imagine they can't. Not with any real specificity.
Huh? You're saying nothing I already didn't say in my initial statement. Useless piggyback statement.No industry?
No woman is safe. Keep in mind this shit happens everywhere, and when i say everywhere i mean it probably happens very close to you too. The women you know, the men you know, the ones you trust, think about them all.
Huh? You're saying nothing I already didn't say in my initial statement. Useless piggyback statement.
I apologize for the delay on this. I am speaking for myself and the rest of the team when I say: We do not condone harassment of any kind. While contractually we're unable to speak on this specific matter, we have been anxiously waiting for a statement. The VICE Union just published the following statement, which we echo wholeheartedly. We absolutely understand the frustration with the delay here, and we echo that frustration as well. Thank you so much for your patience and understanding.
The waypoint members all tweeted this. Seems like legal put the leash on them and they're not speaking up.
Danika posted the tweet in the waypoint forums with this statement:
My feelings as well. I wonder how much they're really up against, legally speaking.They... can walk out. They seemed so inspired by IGN's willingness to do so.
The waypoint members all tweeted this. Seems like legal put the leash on them and they're not speaking up.
Danika posted the tweet in the waypoint forums with this statement:
They... can walk out. They seemed so inspired by IGN's willingness to do so.
My thoughts exactly. What the people at IGN did was courageous and commendable but I'm not going to blast anyone for not risking their livelihood in this economy.There's no singular correct way for internal employees to handle a situation like this and expecting one group to follow another group's template 1:1 is very unfair.
Easier to applaud others than do it oneself, I guess. But who knows about the specifics of the situation. We'll see how it develops, but it's not a great look. I'll add the vice union statement to OP.