Sekiro also cost far less to develop and probably also had lower marketing costs. If it exceeded expectations then it did well.Games with 2 year DLC roadmap, night vision googgles or a special edition co-branded SUV sells more than 10 millions copies. Sekiro is nothing in comparison
very happy for from. but just a heads-up, activision: i'm pretty sure i'm not the only one who was there day 1 'because from!', who won't be there for sekiro 2 :) ...
There is no deal, they just helped testing and published the game in the west. From has complete control over the game.Glad it did well. Now I'm curious what kind of deal From Software made with Activision. I assume there was a "sequel or DLC expansions" clause if it does well. It is Activision after all.
Not necessarily. They signed a contract, which might have stipulations (we want DLC, a sequel, rights to publish etc. if sales over a certain amount). A publishing company can do this. That said, it doesn't mean they did or did not do it.There is no deal, they just helped testing and published the game in the west. From has complete control over the game.
No, because Activision does not have exclusive pubblishin rights. The only thing they can ask for is to be pubblisher of the dlc as well and maybe a contract for a sequel, but they certainly cannot force a dlc, that is internalNot necessarily. They signed a contract, which might have stipulations (we want DLC, a sequel, rights to publish etc. if sales over a certain amount). A publishing company can do this. That said, it doesn't mean they did or did not do it.
That's what I said. A clause for rights to publish DLC/sequel if successful. They can also negotiate something. It's important to undestand you or I do not know what they actually did, so it's not a good idea to say "no, they don't have a deal" when you don't actually know this.No, because Activision does not have exclusive pubblishin rights. The only thing they can ask for is to be pubblisher of the dlc as well and maybe a contract for a sequel, but they certainly cannot force a dlc, that is internal
Apologies, I thought you meant they have a clause that forces them to develop a dlc or sequel in case of good salesThat's what I said. A clause for rights to publish DLC/sequel if successful.
I mean, if they negotiated it in the contract then they will be expected to do it. But it would be something FromSoft agreed to do. But it seems From had most of the leverage since they have been successful, so maybe it's just rights to publish if they do it.Apologies, I thought you meant they have a clause that forces them to develop a dlc or sequel in case of good sales
where can i look at the complete presentation?Helped them a bit in Q1 which was "Better than expected". We all know who the real "King" at Acti is though.