This is going to backfire in massive ways.
The AI will false ban people, and people are going to leave the game and go to something else.
Yup, Siri/Alexa can't detect my Manc accent properly so I wish them the best of luck.
This is going to backfire in massive ways.
The AI will false ban people, and people are going to leave the game and go to something else.
it says actions wont be taken instantaneously and are subject to reviewThis is going to backfire in massive ways.
The AI will false ban people, and people are going to leave the game and go to something else.
This is going to backfire in massive ways.
The AI will false ban people, and people are going to leave the game and go to something else.
Just for comedy sake, if someone uses this defence they must on the spot demonstrate the correct pronunciation of Niger in French and/or any of the local languages. Obviously still ban them, but I want to hear the attempts anyway."I was just talking about the unrest in a specific African country" - gamers, probably
"Listen here you faintcolt ****, you are now banned so stick your ******** **** in a blender, now **** ***. Have a lovely day, heil *****"
I'm pretty sure this AI only understands english and that's going to be a problem.
People speaking other than english might get false banned due to this AI.
Something like this can happen:
https://gamerant.com/apex-legends-japanese-players-ban-run-word/
Imagine if two Norwegian dudes are playing CoD and talking to each other. Then they say something that AI thinks is racist, even though is not. That could easily lead to false bans.
There's also chance that people with speech impediment might get false banned.
However it seems that current system is just flagging at the moment, but knowing activision they might eventually get rid of human moderators and automate their jobs with AI.
I don't know why people in this thread are saying "great" when the risk of players getting false banned is high.
It says they "may" be subject to review. The technology only flags voice clips as probably toxic, coming up with a moderation policy based on that data is up to Activision and they could easily just set it up to auto-ban someone who gets flagged X times.it says actions wont be taken instantaneously and are subject to review
I think this is very fair when it comes to stuff like party chats, but I wouldn't expect any sort of privacy in team chat of a public matchmaking lobby or a server hosted by the developers.it shouldnt be legal to listen/record in game audio imo, though I admit using ai to do it if it was would be a clever loophole.
to me this is a real 'the road to hell to paved with good intentions' moment.
A big selling point of the service is that they filter the audio data before processing to only find the relevant parts and cut down on costs.How many players play and use this feature? That sounds like it could be a lot of processing; whose paying for that?
I can understand banning text and report features etc but active voice moderation as a whole can't be cheap and it's Activision right?
ToxMod's machine learning technology can understand emotion and nuance cues to help differentiate between friendly banter and genuine bad behavior.