It serves themselves. I don't think it's supposed to make a lot of financial sense, but it would give them (as a company and division) an off-ramp rather than a cold turkey plug pull. I think something like this would be done to mitigate brand damage more than anything, especially as they probably intend to launch alternative hardware devices with more mobile form factors, etc. But basically just to line up a soft exit with a punt. A box they can point to and say it met its goals perfectly no matter how it performs, while also fulfilling previous obligations and PR statements, etc. It's totally possible it wouldn't have any traditional exclusives though. Just marketed as "the best place to play" with some other perks and freebies, perhaps early access windows and betas.Why have exclusive games if you're launching a like $699 box aimed at TimDog? Who does it serve? This feels like trying to have your cake and eat it too. Not that I think this is "your" idea or that they won't do this. But if you don't see the point of competing on hardware, not competing 100% on software makes no sense to me.
Too add to this Sea of Thieves was supposedly the big test according to the Verge Tom Warren and going by PSN Montly listing it has done very well. Floodgates will open soon, I would not be surprised if after the June showcase suddenly it will be announced that a lot of games in it are coming to PS/Switch.They're moving a little slowly which is interesting to me. Like "testing" with the first four games. What's the point of the test? They should be moving faster. This is existential for them. I dunno.
Funnily enough dude went full on Playstation recently lol.Why have exclusive games if you're launching a like $699 box aimed at TimDog?
Does brand damage matter much? I feel like the people who would be upset by this are purely online.It serves themselves. I don't think it's supposed to make a lot of financial sense, but it would give them (as a company and division) an off-ramp rather than a cold turkey plug pull. I think something like this would be done to mitigate brand damage more than anything, especially as they probably intend to launch alternative hardware devices with more mobile form factors, etc. But basically just to line up a soft exit with a punt. A box they can point to and say it met its goals perfectly no matter how it performs, while also fulfilling previous obligations and PR statements, etc. It's totally possible it wouldn't have any traditional exclusives though. Just marketed as "the best place to play" with some other perks and freebies, perhaps early access windows and betas.
Yup.If they do something like that, I imagine it'd be a short term thing as they probably aren't long for the hardware game anyway. Ultimately their future is probably in 100% third party publishing.
Like you said in your first statement I think this is probably an internal conflict of directions they're trying to dip their toes in the pool but most can probably predict where this is headed. Putting games on other platforms usually doesn't lead to the ending of: "Suddenly Xbox Series X and NextBoxes started flying off the shelves all over the globe"
I don't necessarily agree with this projection. You can install Windows and run Office on any PC, but they still make Surface devices.Xbox likely has one last dedicated console in them, and their future is sure to be a dedicated and much streamlined 3rd party publisher.
Wasn't that already the case with many Japanese games and several indies? At least they try to prioritise one Plattform first and then go to the Xbox. Recent example would be Baldur's Gate 3.I don't have any data to backup my opinion but wouldn't be very likely to even big third parties to stop supporting Xbox if sales continue to decline? I mean, despite the dubious message surrounding Xbox, maybe third parties will accelerate the "irrelevance" of the hardware taking out this burden of Microsoft itself.
Wasn't that already the case with many Japanese games and several indies? At least they try to prioritise one Plattform first and then go to the Xbox. Recent example would be Baldur's Gate 3.
Xbox's leadership seems to be very online, if nothing else. Saving face and avoiding bruised egos seems like a pretty strong motivator in the corporate world. And you can sorta imagine how important that is to Phil's finely cultivated image. They want to feel like winners. from Microsoft proper's POV, they'd possibly want to avoid reputational damage of looking like Google and doing a rug pull, even though it's actually pretty shrewd and efficient from a strictly business point of view, to be sure.Does brand damage matter much? I feel like the people who would be upset by this are purely online.
Xbox on PC? Why not PC on Xbox?One last console thats basically a mid range PC that will have typical Xbox OS and will also launch Steam big picture. Will cost more than your traditional 4 to 500 dollar box. I doubt they will care how much it will sell, cause it probably wont be much.
Xbox OS on PC
All MS 1p games on PS consoles, PC, and whatever kind of box MS ships, Switch 2 when possible.
GamePass will come to an end
Xbox on PC? Why not PC on Xbox?
Seriously if the Series X allowed you to dual boot Windows it would be a fucking amazing budget gaming pc.
Microsoft should stop using the name Xbox and just beg Valve to go in on making a new Steam machine.Xbox on PC? Why not PC on Xbox?
Seriously if the Series X allowed you to dual boot Windows it would be a fucking amazing budget gaming pc.
Guess it could work. And have game's implement an "Xbox" graphic profile for people who don't want to bother with settings. To get it as close as possible to a console experience.I don't really see the point of both, may as well just make it budget PC and revamp the Xbox PC app to have a big picture mode for TVs like Steam/Deck has. Make it default to that when you boot it up and allow for a switch to desktop mode.
They should still be made by the same team that does Xbox consoles now imo. Hardware is the one thing they do really well.Microsoft should stop using the name Xbox and just beg Valve to go in on making a new Steam machine.
One last console thats basically a mid range PC that will have typical Xbox OS and will also launch Steam big picture. Will cost more than your traditional 4 to 500 dollar box. I doubt they will care how much it will sell, cause it probably wont be much.
Xbox OS on PC
All MS 1p games on PS consoles, PC, and whatever kind of box MS ships, Switch 2 when possible.
GamePass will come to an end
It costs them a lot too. I guess it depends on how many subs they can keep. If the next xbox console bombs, i doubt they will keep with it just on PC. And 3rd party deals will probably continue to get more and more expensive.Game pass makes them billions per year. They're not going to abandon that.
That would also be cool for Series XXbox on PC? Why not PC on Xbox?
Seriously if the Series X allowed you to dual boot Windows it would be a fucking amazing budget gaming pc.
They'll release another console, it'll do even worse and then they'll go full third party.
I think people are less concerned with whether or not it makes sense for Xbox to make a box and more so whether or not it makes sense for Xbox to make exclusives. A console will not lose them much money to support as long as they produce them for a realistic audience size. Scale down production, sell a more expensive premium product for the 20 million or so American diehards who inexplicably will only ever buy an Xbox console. The bigger question is whether or not it makes sense or helps grow your brand to withhold content from PlayStation in that scenario. Leaving money on the table.Xbox hardware will be a thing for as long as consoles are a thing. It'll be interesting to see how they differentiate themselves from PS with exclusives in general being on their way out thanks to skyrocketing costs and shrinking margins.
I mean, we kind of know it doesn't make sense for Xbox or PS to have exclusives anymore, and the execs know that too. Everything is going to be opened up in the next 5 years.I think people are less concerned with whether or not it makes sense for Xbox to make a box and more so whether or not it makes sense for Xbox to make exclusives. A console will not lose them much money to support as long as they produce them for a realistic audience size. Scale down production, sell a more expensive premium product for the 20 million or so American diehards who inexplicably will only ever buy an Xbox console. The bigger question is whether or not it makes sense or helps grow your brand to withhold content from PlayStation in that scenario. Leaving money on the table.
It seems like they think that Gamepass is the end all be all of draw towards their console, but if the last few years have taught us anything that really isn't the case.
Now that they're launching day 1 on PC and even starting to launch games on PS5 and Nintendo, why bother buying an Xbox if I can get a PS5 or gaming PC with the same games, plus even more that don't come to Xbox? What's the point?
I see them releasing a couple more pieces of hardware, continue to struggle to attract buyers, until they eventually shift to being a third party publisher, maybe keeping the Xbox branding on Windows PC gaming features. And I honestly don't see that lasting too long either before their studios get closed or branch out. Those kinds of investments really aren't worth it for a company like Microsoft if you're not also selling a platform that you control and make money on long-term.
Pretty much.They'll release another console, it'll do even worse and then they'll go full third party.
God I hope not. My exit plan is building a Linux PC.Microsoft will make exclusive games for Windows. No more Xbox.
I mean, we kind of know it doesn't make sense for Xbox or PS to have exclusives anymore, and the execs know that too. Everything is going to be opened up in the next 5 years.
selling it made sense before these crazy acquisitions. Nobody can afford ABK. Third party is the only option now