Im sure Joe is still in shock that he liked the Black Ops 4 Beta
Yeah, they get insulted and they come out like a swarm.
Yeah I find that pretty weird too. The game's entire roadmap is a huge mea culpa for past transgressions. No season pass. No microtransactions. Free content over time that keeps the entire player base together over the life of the game.I guess I don't get the whole "Fuck EA" thing... Have they done some shitty stuff, absolutely. But, if they aren't doing it with this game, why not support it and NOT support the games that try and micro transaction the shit out of you?
Have they announced what is there day 1? and a dlc roadmap? I won't buy because I don't trust them ill let someone else be the guinea pig. Plenty of other games to buy and play. If it ends up being good ill buy BFV on when its on sale.Yeah I find that pretty weird too. The game's entire roadmap is a huge mea culpa for past transgressions. No season pass. No microtransactions. Free content over time that keeps the entire player base together over the life of the game.
This is what the end result of 'Fuck EA' actually brought and the response is still 'Fuck EA'. k.
Just for every reason he stated in the video. But I agree the Black Ops 4 beta was great. I can't wait to see what is in store for the Blackout betaHow come? It was surprisingly enjoyable. The PC version seems solid as well.
I had a better time than I did with the BFV Alpha
No this is another massive issue. They havent announced anything apart from it happening. And based on EA and DICE in the past they believe one month news posts are road maps so dont think you'll get some sort of extended 6 month road map like you should.Have they announced what is there day 1? and a dlc roadmap? I won't buy because I don't trust them ill let someone else be the guinea pig. Plenty of other games to buy and play. If it ends up being good ill buy BFV on when its on sale.
When did this happen?EA's mistake was lumping those complaining about the style in with those complaining about women. Then telling them to not buy it. And their shitty justifications didnt help.
https://www.gamasutra.com/view/news..._on_backlash_against_women_in_Battlefield.php"We felt like in today's world—I have a 13-year-old daughter that when the trailer came out and she saw all the flak, she asked me, 'Dad, why's this happening?'" Soderlund said.
"She plays Fortnite, and says, 'I can be a girl in Fortnite. Why are people so upset about this?' She looked at me and she couldn't understand it. And I'm like, ok, as a parent, how the hell am I gonna respond to this, and I just said, 'You know what? You're right. This is not okay.'"
"These are people who are uneducated—they don't understand that this is a plausible scenario, and listen: this is a game," he added. "And today gaming is gender-diverse, like it hasn't been before. There are a lot of female people who want to play, and male players who want to play as a badass [woman]."
"And we don't take any flak. We stand up for the cause, because I think those people who don't understand it, well, you have two choices: either accept it or don't buy the game. I'm fine with either or. It's just not ok."
Yep. The headline is being twisted as a victory for shitheads.I don't understand why this "weak" pre-orders is even a narrative we're giving credence. CoD has always sold better, and RDR2 is RDR2. Is being behind those two really newsworthy in the first place? And BF1 was so extremely hyped up that it would be surprising if the very next game didn't cool the series a little. Very few IPs just grow and grow forever. Hell, has anything except GTA and maybe soon RDR managed?
This is a fantastic post btw.I mean, this was EA 18 years ago.
It's not a matter of "It's <current year>". Female characters in FPS games did not make anyone blink in the late 90s, early 2000s. Delta Force? Female playable characters. Rainbow 6? Female playable characters. Medal of Honor? Female protagonist. There were five FPS games in 2000 with female leads. Something changed in the mid 2000s. A demographic and ideological shift. DICE could have put female fighters in Battlefield 1942 and there would have been very little outrage. Of course some would have raised objections and questioned the game's balance of fun and historical accuracy. But those discussions are inevitable. Nothing like the current internet fury.
I think there's this very misleading idea that we started out dudebro and we're slowly getting "better". But it's really not that simple. Doom was originally supposed to have male and female protagonists. Tom Hall got kicked out, and we ended up with Doom Guy instead. But those protagonists ended up in Rise of the Triad, which was a reasonably popular game.
You know what? If Doom had featured a female protagonist, the public would not have cared in the 90s. They would have assumed Doom Girl was some Ellen Ripley figure. (Remember that Doom was originally based on Alien.) Fast forward to 2018, and something that would have been wholly uncontroversial in the 90s is suddenly a big deal. (Female protagonist in the low budget Doom movie attracts a lot of hate, for instance.) If the next Doom game had a female protagonist there would be so much petty internet outrage. Boycotts. Petitions. Hate mail. Something changed 10-15 years ago. Around the time the "teenage boy-slash-screaming-10-year-old" demographic became the primary focus for publishers. In particular, the FPS genre began to attract (and target through marketing and design changes such as removing female characters) a sort of hard to pin down "jock" demographic. Very competitive, very male, very American. That ended up shaping the FPS genre in a pretty extreme way. edit: Remember when Call of Duty games weren't all about America? I can. After Modern Warfare, the international aspect of Call of Duty was rapidly eroded. You might have non-American team-mates, but you were almost always a red blooded American man.
It happened on reddit a lot when DICE were commenting on things. There were people who didnt like the fact that the uniforms werent something standard in WW2 and this was british uniforms so things like soldiers not wearing helments and prothestics being used. And one of the devs blew up on them about not wanting women in video games, but the post never mentioned women at all. This happened multiple times with multiple people. Then it got all nuked in the end because it turned into an even more toxic shit hole and became ammunition for the people that were against women in the game.When did this happen?
https://www.gamasutra.com/view/news..._on_backlash_against_women_in_Battlefield.php
Soderlund is clearly calling out one viewpoint here.
Yep. The headline is being twisted as a victory for shitheads.
"Game not as popular as year's two most popular games" probably doesn't make as many waves or get as many clicks. Who knew.
I'll have to take your word for it. It makes sense though, doesn't it? If 'historical accuracy' is supposedly the thing these people hold most dear then they shouldn't buy the game. Instead of just moving on from a game whose vision the 'historical accuracy' crowd is at odds with, they'll shit on it, commiserate with those using 'historical accuracy' as a more PC stance than their dislike of women and minorities and make everyone who is actually interested in the game have a shittier time keeping up with it.It happened on reddit a lot when DICE were commenting on things. There were people who didnt like the fact that the uniforms werent something standard in WW2 and this was british uniforms so things like soldiers not wearing helments and prothestics being used. And one of the devs blew up on them about not wanting women in video games, but the post never mentioned women at all. This happened multiple times with multiple people. Then it got all nuked in the end because it turned into an even more toxic shit hole and became ammunition for the people that were against women in the game.
You should watch the video.If Joe or Jim Sterling are against a game it makes me think it might just be for me.
Really can't stand what those 2 have become.
It's really fucked and disappointing.
Eh, I'll support them when they support the Nintendo Switch properly Until then they can fuck off.I guess I don't get the whole "Fuck EA" thing... Have they done some shitty stuff, absolutely. But, if they aren't doing it with this game, why not support it and NOT support the games that try and micro transaction the shit out of you?
Gonna paste and edit a post from another recent thread since I think it's quite (and probably more) apt here:
Battlefield V's marketing is most definitely a mess. In the first few months of its marketing cycle all we've seen are:
- A reveal trailer that felt entirely tonally dissonant to what people expected. Also failed to actually explain anything about what the game was up to the point where some people (me including) were confused about what game mode we were actually seeing.
- Dice's response to the backlash passive aggressively lumping in everyone who had issues with the tone in the sexist asshole crowd. Of course a large percentage of the backlash came from idiotic "the SJWs!" folk but I personally found that the response to it unfairly squashed complaints about tone and that kind of thing does cause some resentment, especially among the more impressionable-but-not-actively-sexist crowds. I also don't like arguments that entirely rely on downplaying video-games as an artistic medium, but that's more a personal gripe than anything important.
- EA inviting a bunch of influencers to play the game and not allowing them to show anything from it, all whilst giving them literally no imagery to base their discussion around.
- E3 reveal that amounted to a short singleplayer cinematic (not even a trailer...), a short multiplayer trailer showing one map and then alpha footage from that same map
- Tons of closed alpha betas when your closest rival is having two very open betas. An open beta in September is way too late, especially since the Blackout beta will be out by then.
Then on top of that you've got:
- Tonal issues. From what little we've seen before I honestly could not tell you what the 'tone' of BFV is. The reveal trailer is a quip-filled Bad Company-like adventure. The E3 trailer is a serious character-driven wartime drama. The most recent trailer is a characterless action fiesta. Compare it to BF1 which, at least in its most public trailers, consistently presented itself as a serious war-time game with a focus on the individual soldier. You knew what game you were buying into whereas with BFV I don't know what exactly I'm buying (if I buy it). Now, of course, BF1 isn't like that at all (the War Stories tried and failed to have that tone) but we're not talking about the final product here, we're talking about the marketing (i.e. what gets people to buy the game).
- Gameplay fatigue. Since Battlefield 1 was pretty much just a WW2 game with a WW1 skin there's little to differentiate BFV in terms of gameplay 'feel', and that's what matters to the average consumer.
- The Release Date. Having the game sandwiched between Black Ops 4 and Red Dead 2 was not a good idea. Battlefield as a franchise simply doesn't have the power behind it to survive against those two juggernauts coming out right before and right after it. Personally I don't know what EA should have chosen but I do know that it should have chosen some time different.
As someone with at least some marketing knowledge I've got to say that Battlefield V is a very good case study in how not to market your game. I don't know whether it's hilarious or frustrating to see so many idiots pointing to "the women!" as the main excuse for why the game's supposed poor performance so far, but I guess it's more sad than anything.
Is it really the noisy minority or are these the numbnuts who tend to buy these games on day 1?it's not the first time battlefield released in a busy month...so i don't think the problem it's the release date
an ill will towards EA though? definitely...EA's stock in terms of reputation among gamers are at the lowest they have ever been
can't really say about the marketing since i don't follow the franchise.
the part about women is and has always been a noisy minority
It was literally a post complaining about the uniforms though. And it wasnt even about them not being Nazi uniforms he was complaining about the british ones and helmets etc. The main issue was he targeted someone and threw them in with the dickheads because he critised the uniform and lack of helmets. That isn't remotely close to complaining about women being in it. I'm trying to find the link because it ended up being screenshotted and posted again but when I do I'll post it.I'll have to take your word for it. It makes sense though, doesn't it? If 'historical accuracy' is supposedly the thing these people hold most dear then they shouldn't buy the game. Instead of just moving on from a game whose vision the 'historical accuracy' crowd is at odds with, they'll shit on it, commiserate with those using 'historical accuracy' as a more PC stance than their dislike of women and minorities and make everyone who is actually interested in the game have a shittier time keeping up with it.
I can't think of a better response than 'don't like it, don't buy it' if you aren't down with what they are selling. I guess I shouldn't have underestimated a gamer's penchant for throwing a tantrum when a dev actually stood up to the mob for once and called them on their bullshit.
You should watch the video.
That's FIFA time, doubt EA would want their two biggest hitters that close.It's too bad EA couldn't get this out in September. I think it would have done okay releasing a few weeks after Spider-Man.
considering how many copies this franchise sells, i doubt you can identifiy the entire userbase in an entire category, let alone one as extremist as whatever people concerned about women in battlefield call themselvesIs it really the noisy minority or are these the numbnuts who tend to buy these games on day 1?
I have to disagree with this. I think it will get overshadowed by both of those games.Battlefield is massive. It's not going to get overshadowed my Call of Duty or even Red Dead.
So everyone who played it thinks it's the best Battlefield game since BC2? That's what I'm questioning.
I've heard that the gameplay has changed but even then I haven't seen it getting near the amount of love of BF2 or BF3 for that matter.