And yet people still complain about them in Apex even though it's free.
/shrug
And yet people still complain about them in Apex even though it's free.
It isn't semantics. You can alter how your character looks greatly without anything from the eververse because all loot changes how you look. In Anthem you need to get a skin to change your appearance. It's like Marvel Heroes, as opposed to Diablo 3 where your appearance also changes with the loot you get. It's an important distinction in loot games.
Considering this is their sole revenue stream taking the game forward, to me it seems fair.
lol, there's no $850 skins (yet).
this.
You'd rather pay for shitty expansions that divide the userbase... Because of cosmetics that you can earn for free that wouldn't even be in the game otherwise?
+10000In loot games, upgrading the appearance of my character is the game.
If my options are paid (good) expansions or grind or pay to skip grind for cosmetics then give me good paid expansions every day.
In theory this is a decent idea. The problem is it hardly works out that way. They're not gonna give away a free 'expansion' worth of content for some stupid microtransactions. They're too greedy, they want both. You'll get little game updates and then they will announce their big $40-60 expansion in 6 months. I remember Bungie telling me that the entire point of the Eververse was to fund free content and we all saw how that turned out (paid expansion 1, paid expansion 2, big paid expansion 3, annual pass).
In loot games, upgrading the appearance of my character is the game.
If my options are paid (good) expansions or grind or pay to skip grind for cosmetics then give me good paid expansions every day.
Typical pricing for cosmetics. Apex has it, Fortnite has it a bunch of games do. Doesn't bother me.
Best way to test the waters is to leak it and see the reaction.
Why does this matter?
Typical pricing for cosmetics. Apex has it, Fortnite has it a bunch of games do. Doesn't bother me.
Since they don't charge for the game, charging for extras is how they get paid and are able to give you the game for free. A company that is already charging $60 for the game doesn't need to subsidize costs the same way a free game does.
eh its fine considering i paid 15€ for a overwatch skin twice but overwatch has 100% free content updates so its not comparable.
Wait in confused, I haven't been following Anthem too closley but isn't it wrong to sell cosmetics in a loot based game?
Isn't that the whole point of playing a loot based game?
Overwatch comparison doesn't work because I'm not playing OW to farm for loot.
Gamers: "You can't criticize Siege/Overwatch's MTX/lootboxes because they earned it!!!!!"Siege earned it with 3+ years of stellar support.
We'll see if Anthem makes even a year before EA decides the margins aren't high enough.
You know what's not free? Overwatch, AC, Destiny 1 and 2, BLOPS, WOW, FFXIV and just about every online retail game. People seem to never complain about Overwatch when Apex is doing the same thing with their free content the only difference is they aren't shilling loot boxes. Also, micro transactions are micro transactions i don't care what the game cost and as long as it's not hurting the actual game/gameplay i don't care.
How many times do i have to post a dozen games that aren't free? And does it matter as long as they aren't scummy micro transactions? Fortnite's model IMO is far worse than Apex and Anthem.
it's amazing how people keep forgetting that game costs continue to sky rocket while the cost of games has remained the same for nearly 2 decades.
Until people stop these prices for shit like this, it will never change, and that includes F2P metrics. Stop spending money on the same shit in F2P games, and they won't be the same costs in premium titles. So often people say let your wallet do the talking, and yet... here we are, you are continuing to let your wallet do the talking by spending the money you have in it rather than keeping it in your pocket.
no no no, they'll accept the benefits, but continue to complain ;)You won't get certain people here to agree with that. According to them microtransactions are the devil in paid games no matter what, and they refuse to accept the benefits.
it's amazing how people keep forgetting that game costs continue to sky rocket while the cost of games has remained the same for nearly 2 decades.
Until people stop these prices for shit like this, it will never change, and that includes F2P metrics. Stop spending money on the same shit in F2P games, and they won't be the same costs in premium titles. So often people say let your wallet do the talking, and yet... here we are, you are continuing to let your wallet do the talking by spending the money you have in it rather than keeping it in your pocket.
It's not. It's completely accurate
That's cool. Hopefully, they don't take too long to earn.Everything in the store can be bought with in-game currency. There are no premium currency-only items.
I don't like it either but it doesn't look like it's going away any time soon.It's still a paid cosmetic unlock in a game built around unlocking causmentics.
It's a bad idea.
But by all means if they want to try, make it free 2 play.
You know what's not free? Overwatch, AC, Destiny 1 and 2, BLOPS, WOW, FFXIV and just about every online retail game. People seem to never complain about Overwatch when Apex is doing the same thing with their free content the only difference is they aren't shilling loot boxes. Also, micro transactions are micro transactions i don't care what the game cost and as long as it's not hurting the actual game/gameplay i don't care.
How many times do i have to post a dozen games that aren't free? And does it matter as long as they aren't scummy micro transactions? Fortnite's model IMO is far worse than Apex and Anthem.
I mean, it is better than lootboxes, but pretty crappy for a $60 game.
Honestly much prefer to pay for the expansions.