I just tried to use this on mobile and it's even worse. Endless scrolling through OTs in two different mobile browser tabs, having to consciously take note of every thread title to see if it's an OT or non-OT, just because I'm checking to see if there's any news, which was 90% of why I browsed Etc. It's four times more time consuming and annoying.
I use Era mostly on mobile and it's so bad. I just glaze thru most of the OTs on here. Not fun to browse at all.
My only complaint is news threads are getiing squished by OT's. Please fix it.
I have to admit that I didn't expect people to put OT creators on the ignore list and will make sure this will get addressed once we decide on how to continue
The parts of the mod/admin team that thought this was a good idea probably shouldn't be making decisions about forum organizational topics like this anymore. Numerous posters in the announcement thread explicitly stated this exact complaint about the OTs and the administrative staff completely disregarded those concerns, speaking past those people instead of actually addressing those concerns directly. The reason the Iraq II/Brexit analogies have been popping up is because this horrible end result was completely predictable, and the fact that the administrative staff could not see it coming is cause for making sure people in those positions don't get to make those decisions again. I'm not asking for anyone to be fired/step down, but I am asking you to consider that this was an unnecessary own goal that resulted from your own hubris and inability to listen.
This change is actively harming the forums, it will be incredibly damaging if you let it go on any longer
I won't go into more detail as this thread is not about the failed feedback thread. I'll say this: it's not that we didn't like the feedback from the thread, but that certain individuals took the thread as an opportunity to lash out against the staff in front of an audience which culminated in a framing of an event that gave the impression that we shutdown a minority community which is nonsense. Our communication in that thread could have been much better, and I apologize for that. That being said: the bits and pieces of valuable feedback are being looked at and incorporated into 2.0.
As for the "redesign disaster": this was always meant as a temporary solution until 2.0 and we always kept the legacy themes available to everybody. To say that we did ignore feedback is wrong as there have been new fixed added since the initial launch version.
Now, I want to get back to this restructuring thing
I can see that.
Of course; I think even if this one started as a troll thread that we can get something valuable out of it, and so far the consensus seems pretty clear to me
We have consulted with community leaders (Prominent Members™) who we see as representatives of our sub-communities about this change and their feedback has been way more positive than in this thread or the announcement one which is why perceived this as a positive change for many. To say that we didn't ask for any input is flat out wrong, but this thread makes it clear that the community wants to be consulted more when it comes to big changes like this one which will be reconsidered.
Let me be clear: the Iraq analogies have been popping up because you made them in the first place, and while I get what you want to express with that analogy, I think it's overly dramatic.
As for the rest of your post: I hear you.
I hear you. I understand that a clean front page is very important to a lot of you and your points make sense
What?
This observation only makes sense if you view entertainment in general as free from politics, which it is not - I even mentioned the LeBron James example and another one would be the NFL shenanigans, stuff like the #OscarsSoWhite controversy or even some #MeToo stories that involve people from the entertainment sector. Politics would have a place in entertainment just as they do in gaming
Clean and easy to use, as well as something that a ton of people here have been familiar with and used to using for 5, 10, 15+ years.One of the biggest pluses of GAF/Era was how clean and easy it was to browse them.
This is anti-thesis of that, legit annoyed.
This sounds a lot like politicians consulting corporations and making changes based on that and ignoring the general populace. Did not a single staff member think about what others would think?We have consulted with community leaders (Prominent Members™) who we see as representatives of our sub-communities about this change and their feedback has been way more positive than in this thread or the announcement one which is why perceived this as a positive change for many. To say that we didn't ask for any input is flat out wrong, but this thread makes it clear that the community wants to be consulted more when it comes to big changes like this one which will be reconsidered.
I refuse to believe this when we live in the same age as Reddit where people have to sort through all their favorite subreddits.A few points:
- More people will have to visit more forum sections, but this is a browsing experience inconvenience for many people in this age.
We have consulted with community leaders (Prominent Members™) who we see as representatives of our sub-communities about this change and their feedback has been way more positive than in this thread or the announcement one which is why perceived this as a positive change for many. To say that we didn't ask for any input is flat out wrong, but this thread makes it clear that the community wants to be consulted more when it comes to big changes like this one which will be reconsidered.
maybe change the title to 'Changing forum layout?' like a thread should've been made before this updateOn a side note, perhaps this thread should be stickied and have a slightly altered title?
On a side note, perhaps this thread should be stickied and have a slightly altered title?
That wasnt the point of the change.I don't see how this is any different from how it was before, besides the possibility of the separation happening over time
Just caught up and I think I understand the frustration with this change.
We never had the intention to seperate politics from entertainment - I think considering how we already moderate threads that are a fusion of both entertainment and politics should be evidence enough of that. A thread about LeBron James calling Clownstick Von Fuckface a bum would have both a place in the Entertainment and the Etcetera section, probably even more so in the Entertainment forum. I understand the fear that we allow people to completely dissappear in their little Entertainment echo chamber, but this Entertainment forum would not be free of that.
I'm sure people will still believe what they want to believe at the end of the day, but I can promise you that when this idea first came up, we only had the best intentions in mind, which was to encourage more discussion and to give more visibility to community threads that different people might find interest in. We talked about this for a long time and decided to at least give it a shot for a some time, which we are doing now. If it's not working after a while, we're obviously not going to leave it as it is, which makes those dooming posts about this change even more confusing to me, but we clearly haven't explained that well enough so I somewhat get why that kind of thinking happens.
From what I understand though is that this change actually feels like a step back to many (especially those who are interested in news and shit) because now you not only have to navigate through three forums to get to the content you are interested in but also have to browse through forums filled with OTs. From that perspective, it absolutely makes sense that a lot of you are annoyed about this change.
So I guess my question is: would you guys be a bit more happy with this change if we had a thread ignore feature that works both on desktop or mobile? Or is this something that should be reversed because it harms your enjoyment of the forum?
We have consulted with community leaders (Prominent Members™) who we see as representatives of our sub-communities about this change and their feedback has been way more positive than in this thread or the announcement one which is why perceived this as a positive change for many. To say that we didn't ask for any input is flat out wrong, but this thread makes it clear that the community wants to be consulted more when it comes to big changes like this one which will be reconsidered.
then they're gonna have to lock it, because it takes me a while to pass out drunk
We have consulted with community leaders (Prominent Members™) who we see as representatives of our sub-communities about this change and their feedback has been way more positive than in this thread or the announcement one which is why perceived this as a positive change for many.
maybe change the title to 'Changing forum layout?' like a thread should've been made before this update
Also considering this place is one of two forums I know/am on that actually fucking have a mental health thread, and this one's the only one that's made me feel comfortable enough to talk openly and it resulted in me getting temporary help from said friends, guess I'm just fucked if I relapseI'm sick of moving and honestly if it comes to that again, I'm probably just going to end up losing the friends I've made on here and that I've maintained on here from the GAF days through to the move
Details and content aside, I appreciate an admin taking some time to write out detailed answers. Maaaaaaaybe we can do this ahead of time in the future?
this is not an effective way to display OTS, not at all
No offense, but you can't really depend on the opinion of what could be a handful of bootlickers looking to validate your own opinion for a such a forum-altering change. Or egomaniacal OT creators that just want to see their own threads become more popular and always show up on page one in a "main forum."
I agree.
The point was to force people to see OTs. They explained this.
I even mentioned this before when people were saying "eh, people will get used to it." Era(and old gaf especially) have been therapeutic for literally hundreds or more of people and this could be bad if it gets messed up.Also considering this place is one of two forums I know/am on that actually fucking have a mental health thread, and this one's the only one that's made me feel comfortable enough to talk openly and it resulted in me getting temporary help from said friends, guess I'm just fucked if I relapse
We have consulted with community leaders (Prominent Members™) who we see as representatives of our sub-communities about this change and their feedback has been way more positive than in this thread or the announcement one which is why perceived this as a positive change for many.
Honestly, the site's intentions don't matter that much, what matters is the end result. The end result is that this is a mess, there's no tinkering with this, forcing us to ignore dozens/hundreds of threads isn't a solution. I'm not a prominent member, but I really do suggest you reverse on this decision ASAP. You're not going to drive more traffic to the forum, you'll actually going to do the exact opposite.
No offense, but you can't really depend on the opinion of what could be a handful of bootlickers looking to validate your own opinion for a such a forum-altering change. Or egomaniacal OT creators that just want to see their own threads become more popular and always show up on page one in a "main forum."
Forum change is bad but these threads and people responding to them still exist.I even mentioned this before when people were saying "eh, people will get used to it." Era(and old gaf especially) have been therapeutic for literally hundreds or more of people and this could be bad if it gets messed up.
then they're gonna have to lock it, because it takes me a while to pass out drunk
While the way it was said is exaggerated, this is exactly what was stated in the previous thread.
Whoare these prominent community leaders?
Im sick of hearing about them? We need confrontation.
No. I have zero confidence in the administration team now that it's been shown to be working for the benefit of the advertisers, and privileged few community leaders.
my issue is, even if it does push OTs forward, which it does, only a few will every be popular enough to stick around the front page
What?
This observation only makes sense if you view entertainment in general as free from politics, which it is not - I even mentioned the LeBron James example and another one would be the NFL shenanigans, stuff like the #OscarsSoWhite controversy or even some #MeToo stories that involve people from the entertainment sector. Politics would have a place in entertainment just as they do in gaming
Definite time for new exodus then.
Not sure how new situation helps smaller OTs if they have to compete with bigger OTs and entertainment threads.