Even if they don't see the difference, the feel of superiority must be delighful for them.
Resident Evil VIllage and?
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
- Status
Wait, what resolution does the Series X run on? If it is the same why are people in this thread actively downplaying ps5 and joke posts of unstable clocks. Wtf happend?
Using reconstruction and cb rendering to hit 4k is not the same as upscaling from the XB1 last gen.
They said that for PS5 too
Warriors of course
"Who cares about Native 4k!!!" *Enters thread specifically talking about native 4k and hits post reply*
Ubisoft's main direction should be a stable engine that runs the game smoothly at 60fps.
Like someone else said previously very eloquently, we are about to hit an all new direction of wars from each side. On one side will be those with magnifying glasses, the other side will be using stopwatches.
Yeah, which is why the thread tittle doesn't really mean anything at the present.
2080s required for 1440p60? Yeah neither console will be native 4k60.will stadia hit 4k 60? I note the ultra-high pc spec is only 4k30, so it's more likely to be 1440p/60, upscaled.
60 FPS is all that really matters. I bet you could put the XSX and PS5 versions of Valhalla side by side and 99% of people wouldn't even be able to tell the difference.
Agreed, why im so excited for ML/DLSS techniques, these games are going to look insane with the savings they'll allow (i assume RT res can be artificially reconstructed too?).
AC Origins wasn't even native 4K on One X and it still looks great on my 4K TV.
or one has a higher rez and the other plays much smoother.
Tbf this is for very high settings, I doubt that either consoles are running at this settings on 4K.
Sony and Microsoft are doing different things with their hardware, and they're seemingly very similar in power. Both have their benefits and cons. Both hardware designs are approaching cooling differently and seem to be taking it very similarly.
A single game having dev trouble from a third party is making you think most other games will have trouble on PS5?
What?
Yeah, not surprising. I expect a whole lot of 4k* *not actually 4k this generation. 60 fps is definitely more important.
Native 4K is not the same as using some rendering technique to reconstruct to 4K. The console manufacturers and publishers should be honest with their render output and how they got there.
We already have the best looking game on Xbox One running at 4k 120 FPS (Multi) with lower input latency + enhanced visuals on Series X. Why is anyone surprised at more games hitting native/dynamic on Series X.
arstechnica.com
Xbox Series X unleashed: Our unrestricted preview
In good news, we finally have a stunning 120fps game. But not much else, games-wise.
arstechnica.com
Which is a shame you'd think they'd be best running it at ultra with a checkerboard resolution wouldn't you for the best looking game?
That's a first-party game.We already have the best looking game on Xbox One running at 4k 120 FPS (Multi) with lower input latency + enhanced visuals on Series X. Why is anyone surprised at more games hitting native/dynamic on Series X.
Xbox Series X unleashed: Our unrestricted preview
In good news, we finally have a stunning 120fps game. But not much else, games-wise.
I expect plenty of checkboard rendering and dynamic resolution scaling this gen. Given the level of fidelity we've already reached this gen, I don't think I'll care one bit as long as the frame rate is solid.
indeed !! i still remember the hate xbox one S got during the comparison. Microsoft went through hell during those periods.
Last gen didnt have parity, Xbox One X games typically ran at higher resolutions over PS4 Pro. It will likely be the same this gen with Series X and PS5.
- Status