The only thing I have my doubts about is 'time travel Thanos'. Not sure if I like it, he feels like a completely new villain with a different persona.
That's literally Thanos' thing in the comics. He always defeats himself.
It was established in GOTG1 that even holding one infinity stone is deadly to most beings in the universe. Let alone holding all of them and channelling their power.I think that whole gauntlet sequence was especially dumb. It stood out to me. The problem is that the movies lack clear rules how the gauntlet is used. That's why I said "so many questions" . Your point is also valid. And was it even shown/known from IW that using the gauntlet almost kills the wielder? Why not just wish some protection against being killed? 🤔
Thor tells the Guardians in Infinity War that a weapon that can match/combat the power of the Infinity Stones is a weapon that's too strong for mere mortals to handle (their minds and bodies would crumble), as such it can be inferred that the same applies for Infinity Stones - which we've seen time and time again throughout the MCU have that effect. That was most notably the case in Guardians of the Galaxy 1, one of the Collector's servants gets vaporized trying to use the Power Stone, and the same would've happened to the Guardians if Peter wasn't part-Celestial (and had to share it with the other crew). In Infinity War, Thanos who is essentially a titan/stronger than the Hulk, get his entire arm roasted. By the time Endgame rolls around and he's using it again, his face is roasted.I think that whole gauntlet sequence was especially dumb. It stood out to me. The problem is that the movies lack clear rules how the gauntlet is used. That's why I said "so many questions" . Your point is also valid. And was it even shown/known from IW that using the gauntlet almost kills the wielder? Why not just wish some protection against being killed? 🤔
Wait, people didn't get that Tony used the same technology on the gauntlet that his suit had? Thus being able to control where the stones go and so on?
Your point is also valid. And was it even shown/known from IW that using the gauntlet almost kills the wielder? Why not just wish some protection against being killed? 🤔
It's the stones themselves. In Guardians, we see what happens when a mortal tries to harness the raw power of a stone. In Infinity War, Thanos' entire gauntlet gets severely damaged after using it. So does Tony's gauntlet in Endgame, but much like the Infinity Gauntlet it can clearly still be used after the fact.Does using the stones always take a toll or did it hurt Hulk and kill Tony because the gauntlet he designed wasn't as efficient as the dwarven gauntlet?
Wait, people didn't get that Tony used the same technology on the gauntlet that his suit had? Thus being able to control where the stones go and so on?
Still should've been shown. I felt annoyed for the remainder of the film. They show everyone braking their back to get the gauntlet off Thanos then Tony magically gets it with zero effort. The fuck.
He didn't erase anything. He just went back and created/lived in another reality where he and Peggy got together. Then perhaps after she died, and he didn't need to protect anything he used his bracelet to return to his original reality and pass on the shield. He might've very well prevented all those things you listed from happening, I mean there's probably a reason why he returns without a hammer but with the shield. We might even find that out in a future film.
It's not off-screen, though. It's a sleight of hand trick, aided by Tony's magi... I mean nanomachines. We are shown the exact moment when Tony tricks Thanos and gets the stones.People don't get how Tony took 6 stones from Thanos and why it had to be off-camera.
People just return. The snapped have not aged. Everyone else has. This is not a big "reset" switch.
is this meme still going on
I'll bet they won't even address how fucked the world would be by all those people coming back after five years, lol.
Look even fantasy movies should have some rules and in universe logic. It's not that hard to implement some simple rules like "the stones have a cool down" or whatever. They took a long ass time to explain how time travel works (only to fuck it up with the cap scene at the end) but they can't give some simple rules for the main artefact of the whole series?It's a comic book movie. Millions of children will watch it. Don't make things too complicated and in-depth.
Cap going in the end to return the gems to close the parallel timelines and saying with Peggy shouldn't have created a new one. Depending how he did interact with world. And yes, there is two Caps, the Endgame one, and the one still frozen solid until first Captain Avenger. Guess he understood? that time is a looped construct and he couldn't change his past. Or future. However Hulk explained that if you go past, your past is your future and vice versa.If Cap goes back to his time to have a life with Peggy, does it work in the same sense as Cap returning to 2012 and encountering himself? Is there a Capsicle in the timeline that Endgame Cap creates? Are there 2 Caps in this timeline? One that remains active with Shield/Avengers, one that lives the civilian life with Peggy? I like the idea of the present being completely unaltered due to any time travel events, and the visited timelines branching off into their own parallel universes. Cap being fulfilled with his dream life with his love and returning to his proper time is a good ending.
Thanos's arm was a husk at the beginning of this movie, so even the dwarven gauntlet takes a big toll on the user, it was just that Thanos was able to tank it more than everyone elseDoes using the stones always take a toll or did it hurt Hulk and kill Tony because the gauntlet he designed wasn't as efficient as the dwarven gauntlet?
So would Thor be able to use the stones without harm since he is a god?
Theoretically I think he might, but considering how out-of-shape he was in Endgame, he might not manage it. That might actually be why they nerfed him, Infinity War Thor was OP. Bruce was better equipped to handle it, plus they mention that the infinity gems are - scientifically peaking - pure gamma, which he can soak up.So would Thor be able to use the stones without harm since he is a god?
Yeah sure but was it shown in IW? I honestly don't remember. Thanos seemed fine in the last shot of IW and he only got messed up after using it a second time in the beginning of Endgame to destroy the stones. But it's not even that important because it was clarified in Endgame.Thanos mentions that it almost killed him and Hulk's arm gets pretty messed up. It's no surprise that a human would die.
What's your issue with the gauntlet? It's pointed out in several movies, Endgame included, that normal human beings (& other comparative beings) cannot handle the power of the infinity stones coursing through their body without dying. That's why Hulk is the one to use it for the anti-snappening and even he is severely damaged by it. Tony is a human, of course he'd die.Look even fantasy movies should have some rules and in universe logic. It's not that hard to implement some simple rules like "the stones have a cool down" or whatever. They took a long ass time to explain how time travel works (only to fuck it up with the cap scene at the end) but they can't give some simple rules for the main artefact of the whole series?
So would a Celestial in the MCU be able to use the stones harm free?
Also, will Hulk's arm heal do we think?
We see a celestial using the power stone on GOTG.So would a Celestial in the MCU be able to use the stones harm free?
Also, will Hulk's arm heal do we think?
Cap going in the end to return the gems to close the parallel timelines and saying with Peggy shouldn't have created a new one. Depending how he did interact with world. And yes, there is two Caps, the Endgame one, and the one still frozen solid until first Captain Avenger. Guess he understood? that time is a looped construct and he couldn't change his past. Or future. However Hulk explained that if you go past, your past is your future and vice versa.
So, Time travel question: with the Avengers killing Thanos in 2024, they create a different timeline branching off in 2014. Which is the very thing that the time stone guardian wants to prevent happening. So since Thanos can't snap away half the population and is gone, they create a potentially better timeline. Also explains why nebula doesn't die when she kills her past self.
Still should've been shown. I felt annoyed for the remainder of the film. They show everyone braking their back to get the gauntlet off Thanos then Tony magically gets it with zero effort. The fuck.
"We need one shot of all the women together, it has to be really obvious that it's all women, like, have the music change and have them all do a pose or something"
While not directly explained, my interpretation is that when Tony snaps the Thanos Army away and they turn to dust, they aren't dead per se as much as snapped back to 2014 (unaware), to continue the timeline as it was. So the events of guardians, infinity war etc. continue unaltered.
Also, we're apparently supposed to believe that every student with a speaking part in Peter Parker's class was dusted, to avoid them being five years ahead of him in Far From Home. Bit convenient, but okay.
To be fair, I did not like that scene with all the woman that much either. Mantis for example isn't even a fighter.Also the entire fight scene between Thanos, Cap, Tony and Thor. It's like duh, we get it, they're all men.
Also the entire fight scene between Thanos, Cap, Tony and Thor. It's like duh, we get it, they're all men.
I think it is still possible. Though, had to check some stuff and apparently Carter had a husband he met after Cap got frozen solid and had two kids with. Though, the name of the husband was never told or more explored, as it was kinda planned to happen in the Agent Carter show. So could be that they tied that plot with Cap being the husband in the end.I don't believe it's possible for Cap to interact with Peggy for a lifetime and not create a parallel timeline. That's changing history, it shouldn't just somehow pour out into the Endgame timeline.
This wouldn't make sense.
I think that whole gauntlet sequence was especially dumb. It stood out to me. The problem is that the movies lack clear rules how the gauntlet is used. That's why I said "so many questions" . Your point is also valid. And was it even shown/known from IW that using the gauntlet almost kills the wielder? Why not just wish some protection against being killed? 🤔
- how did Tony make more gauntlets?What's your issue with the gauntlet? It's pointed out in several movies, Endgame included, that normal human beings (& other comparative beings) cannot handle the power of the infinity stones coursing through their body without dying. That's why Hulk is the one to use it for the anti-snappening and even he is severely damaged by it. Tony is a human, of course he'd die.
Also the entire fight scene between Thanos, Cap, Tony and Thor. It's like duh, we get it, they're all men.