Bruh how you gonna go from "it says it right here" to "it's implied"
So, can I throw my dog down the well?
Bruh how you gonna go from "it says it right here" to "it's implied"
Beat the shit out of them? Spider-manHe killed all those monsters that were attempting to rip him to shreds, with no remorse. Yeah...?
How else should it have gone?
I don't know why everyone keeps thinking Spiderman's entire class was snapped. The only two people in the final scene we know is Peter and Ned. The rest could just be.... other people, who go to that school. Peter could just be going to school with a new class. We aren't told so any option is reasonable.
I feel The Eternals will be the next thing, leading to Galactus or more Celestials. Well that, but I also think we will eventually see for Phase 4 a Young Avengers initiation, albeit shaken up. Spiderman could be their leader having some actual experience, and I expect Stinger(Cassie Lang), to show up in the inevitable Ant Man 3.So we know the Avengers movie were the main movies in the mcu what's going to be the next big movie?
Why would they have any reason to suspect her? Plus she was the only one among those who went to 2014 who knew where Vormir and Morag were, she was the one who programmed the course to Vormir for Clint and Nat. Not to mention the only one who could fly a space ship apart from Rocket...who went to Asgard.From infiltrating and fucking things up. They could've just not sent Nebula with Rhodey, and Thanos wouldn't have known. They would've snapped the glove, without Thanos coming back.
As soon as you bring in time-travel, you add so many what-if's, that can undermine the emotional core of the movie.
Beat the shit out of them? Spider-mandoesn'tvery rarely kills.
They are monsters/cyborgs. Remember in Avengers 1 when they all stop functionning after Tony destroyed the Mother Ship ?I found that part really really weird. He killed all those things with no remorse. It's almost like Zack Snyder directed that scene.
I guess because those were aliens so its okay.
Someone made a joke that they should've just sent Thor with a keg. Would've been the saddest scene in the movie.It's implied. If it was simply cast down a living thing you love then someone could just throw their dog down instead of their wife. Or cast a friend down instead of your wife. You can love many things and many people, but you don't love them all equally.
This post raises many good points. We can all explain it away, but the movie doesn't give us explicit answers for these.It's been discussed to death already in this thread, but I'll write my main complaints:
- They make a huge point that you need one vial of Pym particles and one Stark Time GPS per person to do a time jump. Evil Nebula gets both from Good Nebula and shows them to Thanos. She uses them to go to the future with the rest of the Avengers. Then she manages to get Thanos, his ship and his entire army there as well, despite them not having more particles, suits or time gps. If all it took to get people from the past was someone operating the machine in the future, the whole "we don't have enough Pym particles" deal was bunk.
- Hulk argues that they can just go back in time again and return the stones, fixing those timelines - but, according to the rules, you can't change the past. Every time you go back, you're creating another timeline. So sure, he can go back and create a third timeline where the stones are returned, but it wouldn't fix the second timeline created by removing them.
- In the same vein, when Steve goes back in the end to return the stones, he's going to another timeline. If he never jumps back, the original Falcon would never see him again. He could wait and appear to the Falcon in this new timeline, but those last scenes are clearly meant to be happening in the "main reality". And if he did jump back as an old man, he should have appeared in the time machine, exactly when Falcon thought he would, not in that bench or somewhere else. The machine presumably anchors him in that timeline (otherwise, what's the point of it?).
Bonus nitpick: The Ancient One says removing a stone (don't remember if specifically the time stone or any of them) from a reality messes with the time flow and causes bad shit to happen. How come Thanos destroying them all doesn't fuck everything up, then?
Beat the shit out of them? Spider-mandoesn'tvery rarely kill.
Which will be probably more dramatic and not nearly as bombastic as the avengers movies
Someone made a joke that they should've just sent Thor with a keg. Would've been the saddest scene in the movie.
Someone made a joke that they should've just sent Thor with a keg. Would've been the saddest scene in the movie.
Someone made a joke that they should've just sent Thor with a keg. Would've been the saddest scene in the movie.
Mindless aliens are getting killed mate, hate to break it to you.Beat the shit out of them? Spider-mandoesn'tvery rarely kills.
She is definitely working for me from a character building standpoint, she has such hope inspiring confidence and unflinching resolve that it's the perfect setup to face threats on a scale hitherto undreamt of. A greater and different starting point than what came before, I feel they are going to throw crazy shit at her, can't wait.I'm talking about it entirely from a character-building standpoint.
This post raises many good points. We can all explain it away, but the movie doesn't give us explicit answers for these.
Do you really, really don't want to throw your dog down the well? So much that you really hesitate even if the universe is at stake? So much that you would actually consider dying yourself instead of your dog? So much that you'd mourn for your dog in your every waking hour for a long time afterwards? Then yes.
This post raises many good points. We can all explain it away, but the movie doesn't give us explicit answers for these.
If you love it, then sure? (Well, depends if MCU animals have souls :3) Dunno why you looking to outwit this particular rule and making up implications, it's pretty staightforward.
Do you really, really don't want to throw your dog down the well? So much that you really hesitate even if the universe is at stake? So much that you would actually consider dying yourself instead of your dog? So much that you'd mourn for your dog in your every waking hour for a long time afterwards? Then yes.
I mean, at that point, does it really matter if you love something else more than your dog? All the Soul Stone demands is that you demonstrate that you'd understand the weight of loss.
It's implied. If it was simply cast down a living thing you love then someone could just throw their dog down instead of their wife. Or cast a friend down instead of your wife. You can love many things and many people, but you don't love them all equally.
Right?There's like a 2 minute window in the movie where I believed Ant-Man was brutally killed. It would've been at the moment he believed they'd won and it would've been completely impersonal.
Glad Scott lived, cause that would've been a gut punch.
I wonder how awkward it must have been for Cap when he went to Vormir to put the Soulstone back into place and was face to face again with the Red Skull
Even if it takes 2 years to reverse engineer Pym particles Thanos and Nebula would still arrive when they did and Rocket's already mentioned in the movie that there are several brilliant minds in the universe far ahead of earth beings and we know Maw is a science genius.This post raises many good points. We can all explain it away, but the movie doesn't give us explicit answers for these.
The movie is just way too sloppy, even for a time travel comic film. I mentioned it in my long post, but the time travel scenes have no tension because you have no idea what the rules are and the consequences of breaking them. Cap can fight Cap and that's fine, it doesn't screw with anything. So, if there is no consequences to being caught, no consequences to kill your past self, no consequences with people meddling with the way events unfolded, then it's hard to feel any tension during these scenes.
Hell, why didn't Tony just tell his dad who he was and share a real, final heart-to-heart? Again, all they gotta do his return the stones later on and somehow that cleans the slate.
It's just too sloppy and as a result makes it hard to invest yourself in those scenes.
Of course? I don't understand why it's not a sacrifice.Because we don't love things equally. If you can thrown your dog down instead of your spouse then was that really a sacrifice?
"Rescued the movie" .. you must be fun at partiesI actually think it would have been better if they'd been more cavalier with their approach to the time travel. A lot of the 2nd act felt contrived and expositiony - instead of giving a half-hearted explanation, just commit to the moments they clearly wanted to deliver. Personally I found the second act dull. The final showdown rescued the movie.
The movie is just way too sloppy, even for a time travel comic film. I mentioned it in my long post, but the time travel scenes have no tension because you have no idea what the rules are and the consequences of breaking them. Cap can fight Cap and that's fine, it doesn't screw with anything. So, if there is no consequences to being caught, no consequences to kill your past self, no consequences with people meddling with the way events unfolded, then it's hard to feel any tension during these scenes.
Hell, why didn't Tony just tell his dad who he was and share a real, final heart-to-heart? Again, all they gotta do his return the stones later on and somehow that cleans the slate.
It's just too sloppy and as a result makes it hard to invest yourself in those scenes.
Because we don't love things equally. If you can thrown your dog down instead of your spouse then was that really a sacrifice? You love them both, but not equally. The same with the choice between a friend and your spouse.
Um, yes. That's what love is. You can love something a whole bunch and never want to lose it, but if you have to choose between it and another thing you love more then it's going.
It's implied. If it was simply cast down a living thing you love then someone could just throw their dog down instead of their wife. Or cast a friend down instead of your wife. You can love many things and many people, but you don't love them all equally.
Because we don't love things equally. If you can thrown your dog down instead of your spouse then was that really a sacrifice? You love them both, but not equally. The same with the choice between a friend and your spouse.
If they meant "most", they would have written "most". Y'all are reading way too much into this. You give up something you love, you get the stone, exactly as described.
Everything? No.
What would you think about a William Hurt Red Hulk?
And how do you think Edward Norton would have been in this film?
I mean he's had a lot of character development since then. If you think about it he was still keeping secrets about members of the team (Stark parents deaths) but by this time he fully gives himself to everyone else.Speaking of Cap's hammertime anybody have any ideas what made him worthy when before he barely moved it? I'm thinking before it was just a contest of pride and this time he was in a fight for everyone's lives but that also seems a little too simple. Any events that have occurred over the movies that would make him more worthy?
Speaking of Cap's hammertime anybody have any ideas what made him worthy when before he barely moved it? I'm thinking before it was just a contest of pride and this time he was in a fight for everyone's lives but that also seems a little too simple. Any events that have occurred over the movies that would make him more worthy?