You didn't reply to their post with anything of substance, all I see is you repeatedly insinuating anybody who has a problem with the trailer is a sexist, hates amputees, or some other nonsense. Where does the line get drawn here? If we are going to have British women with prosthetic limbs fighting on the frontlines alongside a bunch of hipsters wearing no protective headgear then Dice might as well call this Bad Company 3. Or they could just come out and say this game is set in an alternate timeline to quell a lot of the backlash. Most people aren't pissed off there is a women in their video game - it's that it feels like diversity is being shoehorned in to sell cosmetics while ignoring historical accuracy. Before you come back with "but battlefield was never realistic you can do x, y, and z!!" please stop for a second and hear me out. The game are grounded in realism to an extent but take gameplay liberties to make it fun. For example, you can jump into any vehicle and pilot it instead of going to flight school for 3 months before you unlock the ability to fly because that wouldn't be fun.
If you want to highlight the accomplishments women had in combat then do it in an accurate and respectful way. Let me play as lady death during a sniper segment in Kiev or Stalingrad. Show women fighting Nazi's as part of the underground French Resistance. Focus on British women at home who faced discrimination and danger manning AA guns while their cities were engulfed in flames thanks to the Luftwaffe. Have a segment where you are a medic or in a field hospital considering the vast majority of women served in support roles, not on the front line.
I think the outrage is a little overblown on both sides.
