• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

monketron

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,915
The article is a bit misleading. It's talking about the rank and file employees. Which is why it mentions how the managers needed to calm them down - probably the people currently working on Sony's streaming stuff - as they probably feel they may be out of job soon if Sony don't need to work on their own tech. Why would they be told about boardroom level negotiations. It's wrong to say Playstation didn't know about this, or Sony went over Playstations head. The top people at PS almost certainly had a huge part in the negotiations, how else would Sony know what they would need from the deal?
 

TheZynster

Member
Oct 26, 2017
13,293
Hopefully this doesn't cause to many issues when they switch from amazon to azure. Both services function quite differently if I remember correctly
 

Arklite

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,647
I'm still surprised they didn't continue with Amazon, especially if this means major structural changes. I know nothing of the tech differences, but it seems Amazon has no problem with reach or resources.

Shame about the blindside.
 

N.Domixis

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
9,208
I find it extraordinarily hard to believe the higher ups at PlayStation didn't know this deal was happening. Very hard.

The way that's worded makes it sound like PlayStation is run by fanboys or something.
Well, we don't prepare on forums for no reason. Lots of good opportunities for fanboy graduates to make a living.
 

Nightengale

Member
Oct 26, 2017
5,712
Malaysia
I'm still surprised they didn't continue with Amazon, especially if this means major structural changes. I know nothing of the tech differences, but it seems Amazon has no problem with reach or resources.

Shame about the blindside.

It's written in the article.

Sony and Amazon held talks last year for a deeper collaboration on cloud gaming, but couldn't agree on commercial terms, according to a person familiar with the matter.
 

itchi

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,287
The company's other online game service and main cash cow, PlayStation Network, enables multiplayer matches of games running on PlayStation 4 consoles. For now that is still hosted by the other giant of cloud computing: Amazon Web Services. Sony and Amazon held talks last year for a deeper collaboration on cloud gaming, but couldn't agree on commercial terms, according to a person familiar with the matter. That led to Sony's discussions with Microsoft, the person said. Amazon is currently developing its own cloud gaming service, the Information reported last year.

First we've heard about Amazon's streaming service? Sony was not impressed it seems.
 

Pryme

Member
Aug 23, 2018
8,164
C'mon guys.
The way the article is worded, it's clear the PlayStation senior management was involved In the discussion.

The rank and file just weren't told. That's nothing strange in large organizations.
 

Kerotan

Banned
Oct 31, 2018
3,951
Good on Sony and MS for working out a better deal then Amazon were offering. The beauty of competition. I'd say MS might host the entire PlayStation network next gen. And if Sony supply MS with image sensors it's win win all round.
 

IIFloodyII

Member
Oct 26, 2017
24,233
I'm still surprised they didn't continue with Amazon, especially if this means major structural changes. I know nothing of the tech differences, but it seems Amazon has no problem with reach or resources.

Shame about the blindside.
They had talks according to the article, seems Amazon didn't offer what Sony wanted so they had talks with another mega Cloud service provider and liked what they had to offer. Presumably MS really wants Sony's image sensors too and it's probably why it's become a full on partnership, instead of 1 just supplying the other with something they lack.

It honestly feels like the first sign of bad things to come for Playstation, like there's that sudden feeling of "this... feels weird"
How?
 

Callibretto

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,539
Indonesia
Good on Sony and MS for working out a better deal then Amazon were offering. The beauty of competition. I'd say MS might host the entire PlayStation network next gen. And if Sony supply MS with image sensors it's win win all round.
wouldn't this mean MS will have access to psn network info, I thought the whole cross platform play debacle is because Sony is very protective about their psn accounts and don't want MS anywhere near them, which is why they're ok with pc cross play but not with xbox.
 

FuzzyAssassin

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
631
The article says it may be a loss for Sony in the long term since they have to pay for Azure access, but isn't it the same for Xbox? I doubt Xbox would be allowed to get the Azure space for free or at a significant discount.
I'm positive that Xbox will have to pay for access to Azure. Regulators almost split up Microsoft over anti-competitive behavior, and since then, their internal training videos hammer in the threat of being regulated for monopolistic, anti-competitive actions. Internal communication between engineers is one thing, but I doubt Xbox will get very much preferential treatment.

wouldn't this mean MS will have access to psn network info, I thought the whole cross platform play debacle is because Sony is very protective about their psn accounts and don't want MS anywhere near them, which is why they're ok with pc cross play but not with xbox.

Cloud providers have very strict rules about what information they can see in a hosted instance. They'd have a major lawsuit on their hands if any proprietary information got out.
 

Jawmuncher

Crisis Dino
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
38,770
Ibis Island
This reminds me one side of Sony sold the God of War movie rights to Universal back in the day because they hated the other so much.
 

IIFloodyII

Member
Oct 26, 2017
24,233
wouldn't this mean MS will have access to psn network info, I thought the whole cross platform play debacle is because Sony is very protective about their psn accounts and don't want MS anywhere near them, which is why they're ok with pc cross play but not with xbox.
We don't actually know if PSN is moving over at this point, PSNow is a safe bet though.
 

JimmyJacking

Member
Oct 28, 2017
414
eh, not gonna go that far with concern trolling but it is shitty to not be transparent with staff about these sorts of changes

Not really that uncommon till the ink is signed.

Most of this stuff would have been classified as commercial in confidence within house. Upper Mgnt of SIE would have known, but are bound by confidentiality notes.

There would be AWS contractors on site, also probably contractor Net Ops staff familiar with AWS whom you still require.

If they made it known last year when negotiations started (if I saw correctly) then they would have jumped ship by now leaving the Org exposed.

It happens a lot in Govt. Depts. where staff feel they get the news from <insert local paper>
 

Kerotan

Banned
Oct 31, 2018
3,951
wouldn't this mean MS will have access to psn network info, I thought the whole cross platform play debacle is because Sony is very protective about their psn accounts and don't want MS anywhere near them, which is why they're ok with pc cross play but not with xbox.
Sony's lawyers would be rubbing their hands with the thought of that. MS wouldn't be so stupid. The bottom line for Sony is will MS offer a better service and at a better price?
 

JimmyJacking

Member
Oct 28, 2017
414
Sony's lawyers would be rubbing their hands with the thought of that. MS wouldn't be so stupid. The bottom line for Sony is will MS offer a better service and at a better price?

It wouldn't just be Sony's lawyers. The .gov clients would jump ship in a heartbeat if a provider was accessing information like that.

It would be scandalous for MS.
 

Kage Maru

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,804
The article says it may be a loss for Sony in the long term since they have to pay for Azure access, but isn't it the same for Xbox? I doubt Xbox would be allowed to get the Azure space for free or at a significant discount.

LOL what? The article makes it sound like the division is run by a bunch of console warriors. The only thing that changes is who the server provider is.
 

TheModestGun

Banned
Dec 5, 2017
3,781
This seems like a potentially hyperbolic article. Notice it says "PlayStation team". Not "PlayStation execs", it could very well be that this wasn't known to lower level people at PlayStation, but higher up PlayStation execs could have been directly involved.
 

YukiroCTX

Prophet of Regret
Member
Oct 30, 2017
3,023
Gven the timeframe of Kodera's positions, I think most of the leadership were likely well aware of the changes to come. Kodera became CEO in 2017, talks only started last year and Kodera stepped down only three months ago to prioritize networking acknowledging the importance going into next gen and having a huge structural change going from AWS to Azure, a deal happening under his leadership likely played a part in the decision. It also makes sense of the timing doing this well before next gen in a year and a half's time in preparation to ensure the quality of launch and streaming services. I would think the one's really blind sided are the staff who work on Networking and Streaming but again, that seems fairly normal for companies in which large deals like this happen.
 
OP
OP
vivftp

vivftp

Member
Oct 29, 2017
19,849
I think it's important to keep in mind that Sony is partnering with Microsoft here and it goes a step beyond just being an Azure customer. With Sonys imaging sensors, their hefty cloud patent portfolio and their several years of experience in cloud gaming I'm sure they were able to negotiate a better deal with Microsoft for access to Azure than an average customer. Maybe those additional terms of the partnership were enough to sweeten the pot enough for Sony to choose Azure over Google or AWS, I don't think we'll ever know.

On another note, I was listening to this recent group podcast for FoxyGameUK (don't ask why, I just wanted something to play in the background as I ran around in Days Gone), and one of the people claimed he had info that Azure was 94% cheaper than AWS. I don't think I can believe that, but anyone know wtf they are talking about?
 

Shpeshal Nick

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,856
Melbourne, Australia
Is it really fanboyish to be panicking about years of work potentially all going down the drain?

Read what I said.

I said it's worded in a way that makes it sound fanboyish. Not that it IS the case.

Reality: "Lower Level PlayStation employees part of the PSNow team were unaware of this deal and upset at all he sudden change withoutbhwir knowledge"

The way this is worded: "PlayStation didn't know about this deal and all the employees were crying"
 

cid85

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
863
Yeh I think this deal would of had a massive input and thumbs up/down from the SIE leadership team.
 

Expy

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,878
Read what I said.

I said it's worded in a way that makes it sound fanboyish. Not that it IS the case.

Reality: "Lower Level PlayStation employees part of the PSNow team were unaware of this deal and upset at all he sudden change withoutbhwir knowledge"

The way this is worded: "PlayStation didn't know about this deal and all the employees were crying"
So the way it was worded is not far off from the truth? The majority of employees aren't at positions that could possibly be knowledgeable of these discussions.
 

Lothars

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
9,765
Wasn't it Bloomberg that made the article about Huawei backdoor which was a telnet? That makes me wary about any article from them that's not full of shit.
 

TheModestGun

Banned
Dec 5, 2017
3,781
It honestly feels like the first sign of bad things to come for Playstation, like there's that sudden feeling of "this... feels weird"
I'm sorry but this is nonsense. Competing companies partner for needs all of the time.

LG and Samsung supply Sony's OLED and LCD panels respectively. Many other companies do the same. It's completely normal for competing companies to cooperate or use each other's services to mutual benefit.

And on the other aspect. This is a Bloomberg article and we don't know the veracity of their sources and the article doesn't even specify WHO on the PlayStation team was blindsided. I almost guarantee the execs at PlayStation knew what was going on.
 

TooBusyLookinGud

Graphics Engineer
Verified
Oct 27, 2017
8,099
California
wouldn't this mean MS will have access to psn network info, I thought the whole cross platform play debacle is because Sony is very protective about their psn accounts and don't want MS anywhere near them, which is why they're ok with pc cross play but not with xbox.
There are much bigger companies than Sony that have data much more sensitive on Azure. What would MS gain from PSN accounts? Xbox is a small part of their company. From a business standpoint, they gain nothing from accessing those accounts and more from Sony using their service.
 
Oct 25, 2017
1,575
Read what I said.

I said it's worded in a way that makes it sound fanboyish. Not that it IS the case.

Reality: "Lower Level PlayStation employees part of the PSNow team were unaware of this deal and upset at all he sudden change withoutbhwir knowledge"

The way this is worded: "PlayStation didn't know about this deal and all the employees were crying"
Read what I said.

I never said that you said it was the case. I did however ask a question to give you an opportunity to further elaborate, and you did, so that's good.
 

Deleted member 1003

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,638
This happens in business a lot, leadership making decisions without telling the rank and file, so it really isn't surprising.
 

Shpeshal Nick

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,856
Melbourne, Australia
I'm sorry but this is nonsense. Competing companies partner for needs all of the time.

LG and Samsung supply Sony's OLED and LCD panels respectively. Many other companies do the same. It's completely normal for competing companies to cooperate or use each other's services to mutual benefit.

And on the other aspect. This is a Bloomberg article and we don't know the veracity of their sources and the article doesn't even specify WHO on the PlayStation team was blindsided. I almost guarantee the execs at PlayStation knew what was going on.

I don't get why people see these deals as strange.

Vaios used Windows, Apple uses (used to use?) Samsung RAM, A few TV Makers were using Sharp panels.

It's all business.
 

Asuka3+1

Alt Account
Banned
Feb 6, 2019
491
Oh no, Sony is loosing faith in the PS brand console model!!!
/s

Jokes aside, weird as fuck move, given that it will have the greatest direct Impact on PS itself
 

Defect

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,740
I find it extraordinarily hard to believe the higher ups at PlayStation didn't know this deal was happening. Very hard.

The way that's worded makes it sound like PlayStation is run by fanboys or something.
I know a few people who work at PlayStation and one of em prefers playing Xbox and that makes his coworkers upset lol.

But yeah, there's no way no one knew.
 

Nightengale

Member
Oct 26, 2017
5,712
Malaysia
I don't get why people see these deals as strange.

Vaios used Windows, Apple uses (used to use?) Samsung RAM, A few TV Makers were using Sharp panels.

It's all business.

From experience - maybe not for component suppliers, but software vendor changes are usually communicated well in advance, even to rank and file.

Because the changes are both structural and interface-level, which impacts a lot of customer-facing roles and back-end support roles, even simple things like changing the CRM software from say... SAP to Salesforce is something most companies tell their frontliners well-in-advance, so that they have ample time to prepare for training, timeline preparation of when the new system goes live/old systems gets decommisioned, and there are already project teams in place to accelerate the adoption of the new hardware/software.

In this case - even though it's likely to be a huge vendor change, the rank and file aren't informed. Granted, a big reason for that is that this MoU clearly states that there are aspects of the deal that are still at an exploratory stage, and that this collaboration is more than just 'Sony buys Azure rack space from MS', there are probably a lot of finer details that hasn't been ironed out.
 
Feb 10, 2018
17,534
It's not good that PlayStation had no say.
It's like PlayStation is the child and Sony are the parent deciding which cloud service the child is allowed.
Very strange.
 

TheRulingRing

Banned
Apr 6, 2018
5,713
Microsoft owns Azure and Xbox. So if it makes you feel better that Microsoft puts money from its left pocket into to its right pocket then I guess your right?!?!?!?!

Yea I know that lol, but it's not just semantics.

The article makes it seem like Xbox's cloud service will end up having better value over Playstation's service because MS owns Azure, with the ultimate result of more people moving to Xbox.

Of course, that would require Xbox getting preferential treatment from the Azure division, which doesn't seem likely.
 

Godzilla24

Member
Nov 12, 2017
3,375
PS Now is terrible so this is a great move by Sony to improve their networks. Microsoft gets money and Sony gets better network. Win win for all. Microsoft is going to rake in dough and hopefully increase Xbox budget for more acquisitions and 1st party development.
 

element

Member
Oct 27, 2017
920
Do you have a source for PS Now using AWS? Unless they're paying Amazon to colocate a bunch of custom server hardware, that seems doubtful. I was under the impression Gaikai had their own data centers and infrastructure prior to the Sony sale that was then put to work for PS Now.
Sorry, should be PSN, not PSNow.