This is the strangest and weirdest fucking thing ever. I really hope the judge sides and gets her out of that hellhole.
Oh, give me a break comparing documented events with "Q level bullshit". The timeline I posted in that exact same post links to the complete documents while highlighting what they found problematic.This is conspiracy theory, almost Q level bullshit. There's a reason this person is making a thread on Twitter and Google docs rather than anyplace serious. Like, these sources referred to are cropped, incomplete court documents that refer to other documents, notepad documents, and "media reports." Common dude.
And what reason is that? And what "serious place" would they otherwise post it? Actually curious.There's a reason this person is making a thread on Twitter and Google docs rather than anyplace serious.
Sure it's possible that there's a conflict issue here given how unique this case is and the money involved, but I don't think it's very likely based on what I've see. termination petition needs to get filed now though.
I don't understand how anyone could enjoy the money they made off a woman they basically enslaved and forced to work for 13 years while keeping her as a virtual prisoner in her own life.
How do they sleep at night?
"we don't know if she's crazy or lying" is now the implication of your posts.
Are you serious? She has 13 years worth of accomplishments proving that she is capable of functionning and working correctly, answering questions throughout thousands of interviews asking her different questions requiring her to elaborate about her life, providing for herself and more than 10 people around her. Not only that, she partly wrote the lyrics of her track, assisted in production and songwriting, developped choreographies, remembered choreographies, had fully understandable discussion and interaction with her fans at shows between 2013-2018. What else does she have to do to prove she is capable?"We don't know what her capacity is" ≠ "she might be lying or crazy"
We truly don't know her medical history AND what she has been going through would be unacceptable under any condition.
I mean, obviously we don't know about her medical records, those are obviously sealed. But we're talking about Britney Spears. She's not sitting at home since the conservatorship was put in place. And you don't send a mentally unstable person to work her ass off on multiple world tours, albums, fragrance and lingerie deals, TV appearances, a Vegas residency and so on. Those are all things Britney has done in the last 13 years. And at least some of it she was forced to do."We don't know what her capacity is" ≠ "she might be lying or crazy"
We truly don't know her medical history AND what she has been going through would be unacceptable under any condition.
Yeah seems logically inconsistent. If she's able to perform at a high level, then she obviously has the ability to do other things. Does she maybe need a therapist or someone else? Maybe, maybe not. But that doesn't mean she needs her life completely controlled in a clearly exploitative and abusive way."She is crazy, we need to control her life and money"
"Oh work on TV, Las Vegas concerts, touring, advertising, yeah yeah she can do that no problemo"
Oh, give me a break comparing documented events with "Q level bullshit". The timeline I posted in that exact same post links to the complete documents while highlighting what they found problematic.
And what reason is that? And what "serious place" would they otherwise post it? Actually curious.
In your experience, then, what's a plausible reason why the lawyer said that they wouldn't touch the termination application and that they were willing to be subbed out instead of doing so?
This entire thing feels like the Black Mirror episode with Miley Cirus. Goes to show that Mental Health issues in the US are so fucked up beyond the pale that even a millionaire will find themselves in a position of despair.
The IUD thing is a violation of human rights plain and simple. People who were responsible for that should go straight to jail.
What doesn't sit right with me is the constant cast of doubt on her memory, her competence, her knowledge, etc as she tries to life a life outside of her father's approval at the age of 39."We don't know what her capacity is" ≠ "she might be lying or crazy"
We truly don't know her medical history AND what she has been going through would be unacceptable under any condition.
Are you serious? She has 13 years worth of accomplishments proving that she is capable of functionning and working correctly, answering questions throughout thousands of interviews asking her different questions requiring her to elaborate about her life, providing for herself and more than 10 people around her. Not only that, she partly wrote the lyrics of her track, assisted in production and songwriting, developped choreographies, remembered choreographies, had fully understandable discussion and interaction with her fans at shows between 2013-2018. What else does she have to do to prove she is capable?
Even if she needs Vallium to calm her anxiety once in a while, doesn't not mean she should be abused and stripped from all her rights. How many people consume drugs and alcohol abusively, and make a lifestyle and a business out of it. By this reasoning, half of the DJs touring the world should be under conservatorship. Let's end the bullcrap, now, cuz you are allowing people to doubt the validity of her claims.
I mean, obviously we don't know about her medical records, those are obviously sealed. But we're talking about Britney Spears. She's not sitting at home since the conservatorship was put in place. And you don't send a mentally unstable person to work her ass off on multiple world tours, albums, fragrance and lingerie deals, TV appearances, a Vegas residency and so on. Those are all things Britney has done in the last 13 years. And at least some of it she was forced to do.
What doesn't sit right with me is the constant cast of doubt on her memory, her competence, her knowledge, etc as she tries to life a life outside of her father's approval at the age of 39.
I don't see what's gained by this relentless skepticism of a woman who is claiming abusive circumstances.
Really? TMZ? A tabloid focused mostly on gossip that has historically published false information?TMZ would be a legitimate step up. Their documentation is very incomplete though. If they're really concerned they should hire an experienced probate lawyer to review what they have then explain and advise. Remember that these court documents often refer to or are supplemented by other documents and I don't see that everything is there.
This is the kind of patronizing dismissal that victimizes people like her and keeps it that way.I didn't say that at all. She's under a conservatorship so she may have difficulty understanding or remembering details like this. She's telling her truth, and good for her.
Really? TMZ? A tabloid focused mostly on gossip that has historically published false information?
You seem to be missing the point of that Twitter thread or the Google Docs file. Firstly, they were written and gathered by Britney's fans, hence they're published on the platforms available to them. It makes very little to no difference if they were to be posted on such a website like TMZ. It's not like TMZ has any legal credibility to vet any of that information.
The documents linked on the Google Docs are public documents, every link on that file directs to the original source of information. If you feel there are missing documents, you're free to look them up to back up your argument here.
Additionally, these are fans rallying to make the judge look into the conservatorship more carefully. They're not the ones making the final decision. They're not in court legally defending Britney. Their main goal is to make enough noise so the case receives more scrutiny, and vocally support Britney. Judge Penny is the one making the final decision, and I assume she has access to all documents.
But hey, you don't need to take my word or Free Britney's word for it. Here is a more reputable source than TMZ bringing enough information to warrant concern:
Britney Spears Quietly Pushed for Years to End Her Conservatorship (Published 2021)
Confidential court records obtained by The Times reveal that the singer has urged changes to the arrangement that controls her life, and her father’s role in leading it.www.nytimes.com
Hound sounds like they really wish they were Spears' lawyer, they're missing out on a lot of easily and personally justifiable money there it would seem.
No thanks, I have enough stuff to deal with and I don't qualify for a 475 an hour rate anyway. More than anything right now I want to work less and take a real vacation. lol if you think this shit is easy.
Dude, in 2008, Britney was promised out of the conservatorship after the Circus Tour. It's what she wanted from Day One. Do you get that this is less than 6 months after she was put in that situation? They lied to her and made a new arrangement, and change her medication. During the Femme Fatale Era in 2010-2011 she appared completely drugged out, and I guess this is directly related to that arrangement. Britney has always wanted out, and by sealing the records of the court, they have silenced her entirely - that is until very recently, in 2019, a concerned intern in a law firm leaked that Andrew Wallet, the co-conservator at the time, has expressed very serious concerns about the gravity of the situation, even stating that him staying in this conservatorship and supporting Jamie's decisions and claims could be dangerous to the conservatee - Britney. Turns out this was entirely true, as Britney had been forced to facility at that time and forced to take Lithium.Thats a somewhat decent article. It references a portion of the investigator's report, which is of interest and raises a concern. The investigators' reports are really the eyes and ears of the court, and they're typically very detailed and include information about a conservatees demeanor, ability to respond intelligently to questions, medical history, statements of family, etc. It's a human creation, so they're not perfect, but they can be very helpful to the court when placed in context, which we don't fully have. However there are valid reasons why she might say this to the investigator and then decline to direct her attorney to file the paperwork. It sounds like there's been a gradual buildup in her requests for her independence, starting with asking to have her father removed. Hope a petition gets filed and she gets her day in court with an attorney who's got her back. :)
No thanks, I have enough stuff to deal with and I don't qualify for a 475 an hour rate anyway. More than anything right now I want to work less and take a real vacation. lol if you think this shit is easy.
Dude, in 2008, Britney was promised out of the conservatorship after the Circus Tour. It's what she wanted from Day One. Do you get that this is less than 6 months after she was put in that situation? They lied to her and made a new arrangement, and change her medication. During the Femme Fatale Era in 2010-2011 she appared completely drugged out, and I guess this is directly related to that arrangement. Britney has always wanted out, and by sealing the records of the court, they have silenced her entirely - that is until very recently, in 2019, a concerned intern in a law firm leaked that Andrew Wallet, the co-conservator at the time, has expressed very serious concerns about the gravity of the situation, even stating that him staying in this conservatorship and supporting Jamie's decisions and claims could be dangerous to the conservatee - Britney. Turns out this was entirely true, as Britney had been forced to facility at that time and forced to take Lithium.
For real. I gave up after that.Also lol @ you mentioning a predatory tabloid outlet like TMZ which profits from this culture of celeb exploitation and looking down your nose at the NYT's "somewhat decent" coverage of this as though the severity of this story is all just the result of some imagined, ephemeral obsession from fans online.
Yeh what the fuck. Hound can pound sand.This is the kind of patronizing dismissal that victimizes people like her and keeps it that way.
'She's telling her truth, and good for her.' Makes me genuinely shudder.
"It's very unusual to end a conservatorship precisely because people in conservatorships don't get better," legal analyst Lisa Green told the "TODAY" show Thursday. "While Britney would wish the judge could wave a magic wand and end this, what's going to happen is that it will start a whole new proceeding, and the judge will hear from Britney, and her friends and relatives can speak."
"But the conservators, including her father, may not agree with her," Green said.
A substantial amount of evidence, including medical evaluations, would also be needed to prove that the conservatorship was no longer necessary — a procedure that Spears requested in her testimony to forgo, alleging that her father has previously subjected her to numerous health evaluations.
The most realistic scenario is that the conservatorship remains, her father is removed and the conditions under the court arrangement will loosen, according to Tamar Arminak, a lawyer who worked with the actor Amanda Bynes' parents in her 2014 conservatorship case.
I mean, obviously we don't know about her medical records, those are obviously sealed. But we're talking about Britney Spears. She's not sitting at home since the conservatorship was put in place. And you don't send a mentally unstable person to work her ass off on multiple world tours, albums, fragrance and lingerie deals, TV appearances, a Vegas residency and so on. Those are all things Britney has done in the last 13 years. And at least some of it she was forced to do.
That NBC legal analyst talking head in the article though: "people in conservatorships don't get better." Obviously this is not a typical or ideally implemented conservatorship involving a person who clearly needs indefinite help due to being critically incapacitated in some ongoing form.
And the doctors and lawyers he hired. All of them are complicit and guilty in cooperating in human rights abuses.
"We don't know what her capacity is" ≠ "she might be lying or crazy"
We truly don't know her medical history AND what she has been going through would be unacceptable under any condition.
There's clearly something quite fishy about this, and it's weird to see so many posts trying to justify the abuse she's going through.
"We don't know what her capacity is" ≠ "she might be lying or crazy"
We truly don't know her medical history AND what she has been going through would be unacceptable under any condition.
I have been since '98 and have been feeling some guilt about attending the PoM world tour knowing now how unhappy she was during it.I don't know if there are other Britney fans in here, but all of us that are, we know how powerful it was to finally hear Britney from her own words say all these things. In one hand it was relieving to finally have a confirmation of all these "conspiracy theories" but at the same time it was horrible to know she's actually had to go through all of that and even worse details we didn't have idea like the IUD. I was literally in tears as I was listening to the livestream while it was happening. And she only narrated what happened from 2018 onwards.
That's the whole point.
There are two types of conservatorships, one for mental illnesses, which only last for a year, and after this period of time, they have to evaluate again whether it continues or not. They cannot be made permanent. This however, is not the kind of conservatorship Britney was put under.
She's under the one that's normally used for patients with Alzheimer or similar conditions, that as you say, are typically for people of old age, that won't get any better, but all the opposite, they'll get worse with time as these are degenerative conditions. Most people don't get to live more than 10 years after the diagnosis.
Sadly, the law is very loose in terms of who can fall under this conservatorship, even if anyone familiarized with the law know these are typically for old people, the law doesn't specified a minimum age, and that's how Britney at 26 years old was put under one.
The main excuse they've kept this in place is because "she's susceptible to undue influence" based on God knows what. The ironic part is that there are actually cases where people really want / need a conservatorship to take care of their ill parents, and they get denied, because they can't prove that their 90+ year old parent with Alzheimer lacks the capacity to take their own decisions. Sometimes even the fact that they have someone around them willing to help them disqualifies them for the conservatorship because they're considered as not entirely incapacitated. Britney's conservatorship was granted in a record time, in a matter of days. They violated the process specified by the law, which was to notify her with 5 days in advance, allow her to hire a lawyer of her preference and contest the petition. They only notified her once the conservatorship was already granted, because her father asked the judge not to tell her, and the corrupt judge agreed.
The judge, btw, Reva Goetz, is linked to many other cases of conservatorship abuse, but the sneaky witch retired from the case in 2016 before all this exploded. She needs to be investigated too.
I have been since '98 and have been feeling some guilt about attending the PoM world tour knowing now how unhappy she was during it.
Makes perfect sense, like you said this kind of arrangement is obviously for people with serious, permanent illnesses like Alzheimer's. Thanks for the additional info, I wouldn't be surprised if the current judge is corrupt like the last one you mentioned. The problematic conservatorship laws aside, there also definitely is not enough oversight and accountability for judges in this country either.
edit: Brief search on both Twitter and online regarding that Reva Goetz shows she's a completely corrupt whore who helped orchestrate and assist her father in Spears being denied her rights by the conservatorship. She's now an arbitrator who works for a private company of course (just a few examples I found, I take no responsibility for these links/Twitter ppl and apologize in advance if they are actually problematic sources):
Corrupt Judge Reva G. Goetz - Court Victim Network
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Reva Garfunkel Goetz #102692 Hon. Reva G. Goetz, Los Angeles Superior Court, Retired, joined ARC after serving as a highly regarded Probate Judge from 2007 to 2014. Judge Goetz handled hundreds of contested, complex probate, trust and estate and conservatorship...courtvictim.com
It just seems logically inconsistent to me to hold that someone is so incapable of handling themselves that they need basically their human rights removed, but they're also capable of performing at a high level consistently along with doing all of the associated work needed to put on performances.
<snip>
Here they are, Britney's father, Lou M. Taylor and Lou's husband, getting baptized at the Jordan River in 2017, while Britney was touring Asia
Also, Lou's involvement is not only speculative, Britney's mom literally revealed it on her book in 2008. They were planning the conservatorship with months in advance. It wasn't just because Britney was put in the 5150, the 5150's were part of the plan.
Lou only quit last year as Britney's business management after all the legal battle started, not before asking Britney's father a minimum of $300,000 a year whether Britney was performing or not (she's been on hiatus since 2019). In turn, James Spears hired (without asking Britney of course) Michael Kane as the new business manager, no other than Michael Jackson's final business manager who got involved with his estate shortly before he passed away. It really is like a horror movie.
Horror movie is right, it's like a deranged mini cult and corrupt legal network all working in tandem against the vulnerable in Hollywood. I feel like I'm seeing the makings of a major Netflix or HBO Max docu-series in the future.