Read the whole thread. The poster misrepresented Chappelles' statement heavily.
How he believes in trans people because they are able to do something like that willingly vs how Rachel Dolezal wouldn't even change her name
It wasn't a joke. It was a throwaway line. He said if someone wants to do that, they should be able to.
And that's ignoring all the people who are trans and not white who have problems with his jokes.
And he may not be willing to admit he has a problem with us, but when his jokes have boiled down to "You're just men in dresses", that's not showing us the dignity that he says we deserve.
The fundamental disagreement you have with Dave Chappelle is you don't think he should joke in this way about you. He will never agree with you on that. Most comedians will never agree with you on that.
You can choose to read his thoughts and feelings based on his material, or you can listen to the large block of serious time he gave to his thoughts and feelings on the matter. If clarifying that and telling the portion of his audience that would do harm to trans persons to fuck off (paraphrase) isn't good enough for you, that's the best he was going to do for you. He clearly felt like he owed you an explanation, not an apology.
I can see how it can be interpreted both ways. It's clumsy at the very least. While it might genuinely just be a comment on those people who wouldn't have cared if there weren't white people involved, the way he tells this to me also seemed to imply that being transgender is itself white privilege. I might be wrong on that, but I don't think it's that crazy to infer that from what he said and how he said it. He also could've made that point without claiming outright that it is 'insulting to black people' that these things are being talked about.It wasn't a joke and I think you're inferring the opposite of what he's saying.
He's not erasing anyone. He's saying this type of response to this material only exists because white men are in on it. If anything the commentary here is that he feels that if trans was racially exclusive to non-whites, this discourse would not be treated the same way.
He's completely right about that but think it was clumsy.
I would very much recommend watching it yourself too and not basing your opinions purely on my impressions - the things I take away from it might be different from yours.What the fuck.
Thanks for elaborating, I wasn't sure if I could watch this after rumors had been floating around that he was still using trans jokes as material. That is some....not good sounding stuff, especially including the sidelining of trans people of color. I think this will remain a pass for me.
I'd appreciate it if you'd respond to me directly with an explanation of how I 'heavily misrepresented' his statement instead of simply presenting that as an undeniable fact in a reply to someone else. I don't mean that in a snarky way, I'd just genuinely appreciate it.Read the whole thread. The poster misrepresented Chappelles' statement heavily.
Someone already did. Didn't feel the need the need to pile on. But noted. In the end, I gotta remember that people are going to see things differently. And that doesn't make it made up. So I apologize for saying "misrepresented."I can see how it can be interpreted both ways. It's clumsy at the very least. While it might genuinely just be a comment on those people who wouldn't have cared if there weren't white people involved, the way he tells this to me also seemed to imply that being transgender is itself white privilege. I might be wrong on that, but I don't think it's that crazy to infer that from what he said and how he said it. He also could've made that point without claiming outright that it is 'insulting to black people' that these things are being talked about.
I would very much recommend watching it yourself too and not basing your opinions purely on my impressions - the things I take away from it might be different from yours.
I'd appreciate it if you'd respond to me directly with an explanation of how I 'heavily misrepresented' his statement instead of simply presenting that as an undeniable fact in a reply to someone else. I don't mean that in a snarky way, I'd just genuinely appreciate it.
No, no one has said that. But when your jokes are "you're just men" that's not a joke. That's just what transphobic assholes say to us to insult us on a regular basis. And he didn't address those "jokes" in any way, because he didn't think those were the ones we found offensive. There is a serious reason why so many trans people have problems with these jokes, and its not that we can't handle any jokes whatsoever. Its that these are just blatant insults to us.
It wasn't a joke. It was a throwaway line. He said if someone wants to do that, they should be able to.
I will fully agree that Chapelle's been tone deaf in this matter. Even his aside was a bit defensive, but it's worth listening to because he actually addresses the criticism directly. But I don't think he will satisfies all his critics on the issue. Like another poster said, it's clumsy.
And that's ignoring all the people who are trans and not white who have problems with his jokes.
To be honest, I still think it was a clumsy segment. He does comes off as defensive, but it is a rather serious aside. He not piling on with more jokes in the segment. You may not be satisfied with his take. My point is more to see it for yourself and make your conclusions.I appreciate the answer and will consider watching these to come to a judgement for myself.
As an aside, it is troubling to see this barely veiled aggression against trans people simmering just below the surface in this thread, with remarks such as "Every Chappelle thread", "Enjoy this thread while you can", and "Is that good enough for you". I think it's important to have a discussion about this, especially considering his history. If Dave is able to grow and learn from this as a person then I will be happy for him.
They are jokes. They're structured with a set-up, lead and punch-line. They're designed to solicit laughter. You can read whatever malice you want out of them, but you're objectively not correct about them being anything other than punchlines.
I appreciate the answer and will consider watching these to come to a judgement for myself.
As an aside, it is troubling to see this barely veiled aggression against trans people simmering just below the surface in this thread, with remarks such as "Every Chappelle thread", "Enjoy this thread while you can", and "Is that good enough for you". I think it's important to have a discussion about this, especially considering his history. If Dave is able to grow and learn from this as a person then I will be happy for him.
No, his own views in the matter very clearly are showing in those "jokes".
Every. Single. Dave. Chapelle. Thread. Forever
Looking forward to the special
Heaven forbid people talk about the material in the special in a thread about the special.
They don't want us to be too uppity. They just want to laugh at us with Chappelle.
No fun allowed, yes I want to laugh at you. I also want to laugh at me, laugh at Dave, laugh at his white people jokes, laugh at his black people jokes. Why do you think you should be excluded? I thought that's the opposite of what you would want, exclusion and all.
He talks about it and says he makes fun about everybody. So if anybody is offended AGAIN its time to get a new hobby because if you cant laugh about jokes just because its about you its time to do something else.
I'm from poland and there are so many jokes about us here in germany and you dont see me cry about it. If the joke is good i laugh about it. If its lame then its lame and it doesnt get a laugh from me. Simple.
That's not what he says at all. If anyone wants to know without watching the special:
He says he pissed off the trans community and tells the story of a letter a trans fan wrote him about how devestated they were by his material. The letter upset him and while he has a policy to not feel bad about anything he says or does on stage, he felt bad because they felt bad. He tells the joke he think hurt them (a bit about how he thinks Caitlyn Jenner posing nude would be gross, but mostly because he wouldn't have the strength to NOT look at them. This includes a bit about posing Hustler style, with spread lips and a hidden dick).
He said he reflected on the fact that he has a bunch of trans material and asked himself whether or not he has a problem with transgender peoples. He says no, he doesn't and clarifies that he believes they deserve dignity and safety. He also says that, as a black man, he wonders if this level of touchy discourse would exist if white men didn't want to transition. He asks "since when does America give a fuck how we feel on the inside". He goes into another bit about unknowingly dancing with a transwoman at a club, being surprised by that but taking her home and titty fucking her because "those breasts are as real as any others in LA".
Idk about you guys but I really hate it whenever the audience bursts into rowdy applause everytime Chappelle says even the slightest negative thing about Trump. To me it just reeks of "cheering him on because he agrees with me". It gets under my skin. Not Chappelle's fault just my problem with the crowd.
The disagreement isn't that jokes shouldn't be made about us, it's that a lot of his old jokes were simply a regurgitation of transphobic rhetoric. They weren't so much jokes as things that are said on a regular basis to us to dismiss, insult, and demonize us. It was simply the same rhetoric that is used to push legislation that denies us our rights. From watching this special, I didn't get the impression that he realizes this.The fundamental disagreement you have with Dave Chappelle is you don't think he should joke in this way about you. He will never agree with you on that. Most comedians will never agree with you on that.
You can choose to read his thoughts and feelings based on his material, or you can listen to the large block of serious time he gave to his thoughts and feelings on the matter. If clarifying that and telling the portion of his audience that would do harm to trans persons to fuck off (paraphrase) isn't good enough for you, that's the best he was going to do for you. He clearly felt like he owed you an explanation, not an apology.
I see this too and it's making me extremely uncomfortable...As an aside, it is troubling to see this barely veiled aggression against trans people simmering just below the surface in this thread, with remarks such as "Every Chappelle thread", "Enjoy this thread while you can", and "Is that good enough for you". I think it's important to have a discussion about this, especially considering his history. If Dave is able to grow and learn from this as a person then I will be happy for him.
Ketkat isn't even going to watch the specials and I'm thinking didn't even watch the other ones.
Because clearly anyone who has a complaint about Chappelle must not watch him
I think they were cheering because it was funny, because it was
As an aside, it is troubling to see this barely veiled aggression against trans people simmering just below the surface in this thread, with remarks such as "Every Chappelle thread", "Enjoy this thread while you can", and "Is that good enough for you". I think it's important to have a discussion about this, especially considering his history. If Dave is able to grow and learn from this as a person then I will be happy for him.
Being from Poland = being a marginalized and commonly attacked minority now. You heard it here first folks.
.
It's clumsy because he did the bare minimum apology for something he probably feels he shouldn't have to address but will because it's the "right thing to do"It wasn't a joke. It was a throwaway line. He said if someone wants to do that, they should be able to.
I will fully agree that Chapelle's been tone deaf in this matter. Even his aside was a bit defensive, but it's worth listening to because he actually addresses the criticism directly. But I don't think he will satisfies all his critics on the issue. Like another poster said, it's clumsy.
To be clear, it was never meant to be an apology. It was an explanation. He seriously addressed it, but I didn't see it as an apology.It's clumsy because he did the bare minimum apology for something he probably feels he shouldn't have to address but will because it's the "right thing to do"
Then again I'm also the type to never believe an apology because 9 out of 10 times you have to offer it if you ever plan on making money again.
Yeah I guess I should have looked at it that way, people aren't going to be happy. That's not cool.....but the special was still hilarious (to me)To be clear, it was never meant to be an apology. It was an explanation. He seriously addressed it, but I didn't see it as an apology.