Then I clearly misread.What I just proposed doesn't have mouse and keyboard players though?
PC playerbase for CoD will always be an issue.
Then I clearly misread.What I just proposed doesn't have mouse and keyboard players though?
Fair point. Maybe I'm starting to become part of the crowd that isn't sure how about just renaming new games after the original again. Doesn't particularly bother me wither way honestly, just something that doesn't inspire or excite me right away.
It would be nice if they instead matched players by input method rather than platform. KB+M against KB+M, controller vs controller, etc.Lame for the crossplay, it doesnt fix the main problem of no crossplay for pc cod games which is that they die a month after release. Was a sure purchase upon reading the op but now not so sure
Seems like it's only PS4 <-> PC and XB1 <-> PC.
Yah, few decent ones don't make up for an industry of mediocrity, coddling up to publishers and lack of any standards or bearer to entry. There is little respect for it for a reason.
Also a fair point. I'm just really stepping over myself here.I would be kinda goofy naming this cod:mw4 when the original was cod4:mw 😂
The games industry values outlets because they are free marketing lmao...What a bad arguementThe vast majority of people in any field are incompetent. Not everyone is the best at what they do or works for a company that's at the forefront of their industry. Suggesting that exclusively games journalism suffers from mediocrity is absurd.
Additionally, those who have "little respect" for it are largely extremist enthusiast. The type of people who feel that they and their internet mob are the authority on the matter, and have forum meltdowns when an outlet gives a game they like a poor score. The kind of people who latched onto gamergate bullshit.
The games industry as a whole very explicitly values their peers at outlets like Giant Bomb, Kotaku, Polygon, Waypoint, Eurogamer, Famitsu, EGM, etc.
The games industry values outlets because they are free marketing lmao...What a bad arguement
Do you think that has any relevence for respect for their work on a factual / consumer friendly / professional writing level? For every Jason there are 10 guys that can't even play their game at an above average level. Watch a CoD MP review, how are we supposed to call these decent reviews when the people reviewing the game are the bottom of the barrel lobby filler? The amount of podcasts I've listened to where people that are "Journalists" have no idea how game development, or tech specs works is hilarious.Do you genuinely think that the people who work for publishers and developers have no relationship with the press outside of "well they market our games lmao"?
Do you think that has any relevence for respect for their work on a factual / consumer friendly / professional writing level? For every Jason there are 10 guys that can't even play their game at an above average level. Feel the need to call everything "DARK SOULS MEETS X". "Oblivion with Guns" was a joke at the time but is a running theme. Regardless this is off topic.
Cross play better be opt in. I'm not playing against a kb/m user with a controller lol.
The games industry journalism is bottom of the barrel for any of the main industries. Likely due to it's earlier adoption of Youtube/Internet formats.What's your point here? For every Jony Ive there's literally hundreds of thousands of industrial designers that churn out barely acceptable work every day. For every Quentin Tarantino there's hundreds of thousands of horrible "directors" making terrible content for terrible platforms. As I said in my last post, the vast majority of people in any profession are terrible at what they do and work for problematic companies. Journalism and games journalism is not unique in this.
I'm really confused, is this just a remake of Modern Warfare, basically starting over from scratch and using Price as the tether to OG Modern Warfare and branching off with a brand new story?
I'm really confused, is this just a remake of Modern Warfare, basically starting over from scratch and using Price as the tether to OG Modern Warfare and branching off with a brand new story?
I'm really confused, is this just a remake of Modern Warfare, basically starting over from scratch and using Price as the tether to OG Modern Warfare and branching off with a brand new story?
Outside waw, their output has been horrible.Treyarch is so fucked lmao. We'll see if they stick to their bullshit 3 lane linear map design once they get taken to the woodshed by Geoffery Smith and Alex Roycewicz designed maps.
Like what for example? We have enough huge open world bloat AAA games and linear AAA campaigns are just about dead these days.I guess I'm a little bummed that we're simply just getting another cinematic linear Call of Duty experience.
For pretty much the biggest franchise in video games, I think the Single Player aspect of these games could be much much more.
They did try some new idea with Infinite Warfare's campaign but it got done dirty by the usual COD peasants because of its lackluster MP. Obviously Activision looks at the bigger picture and figures out "Well no one liked the game so lets go back to the usual".I guess I'm a little bummed that we're simply just getting another cinematic linear Call of Duty experience.
For pretty much the biggest franchise in video games, I think the Single Player aspect of these games could be much much more.
Do you feel good hiting your targets with aim assist helping? Really?I'm the one weirdo who likes battling against m+kb users while on a controller. Makes me feel good when I win :p
Yeh I don't get it.Like what for example? We have enough huge open world bloat AAA games and linear AAA campaigns are just about dead these days.
Will it have cross-progression or just cross play?
Based on EZA's video, seems like it will be a re-imagining/reboot, not a remake. They realized that they went too far with the technology/spectacle, and instead of going bigger they are going deeper.
I move analog sticks like a proDo you feel good hiting your targets with aim assist helping? Really?
I just watched a YouTuber describe the campaign preview and he mentioned how they didn't even see the "very mature content."
I really hope there isn't a rape scene in this game. Straight up that type of content is just not worth putting in a game. This CoD sounds like it deserves an Adult Only rating.
No it is not obvious since in the video the YouTuber already describes civilian death, massive children death, and murder by child victims. An Activision saying that what was shown off to those who were at the preview wasn't even the "very mature content" (scare quotes used by the YouTuber implying the employee used them) calls into question what else could be shown....Why would there be a rape scene in a CoD game?
It's kinda obvious the "mature content" refers to the death of civilians via terror attacks/civil war conflicts shown in the trailer
That's strange.
Death and collateral damage are the bullet points for this game.No it is not obvious since in the video the YouTuber already describes civilian death, massive children death, and murder by child victims. An Activision saying that what was shown off to those who were at the preview wasn't even the "very mature content" (scare quotes used by the YouTuber implying the employee used them) calls into question what else could be shown.
The preview focused on a town being massacred with a playground of dead children.
So then feel free to explain how the content already showed doesn't equate to the "very mature content." Since that content already touches on death and collateral damage to a huge degree.Death and collateral damage are the bullet points for this game.
Rape isn't. It has never been part of call of duty. Death and Collateral damage have been explored in the past.
So then feel free to explain how the content already showed doesn't equate to the "very mature content." Since that content already touches on death and collateral damage to a huge degree.