The problem is that you're listing partisans on their take of the matter. The credibility of politicians policing other politicians is weak at best considering this opens up the opportunity for grand standing. Kinda like the Duffy affair. At the end of the day no one ever gets charged in these things so it's a lot of song and dance for nothing.
Now if people want to approach this through a partisan sense be my guest, but listing members of opposition parties salivating at the proposition of taking down Trudeau ruins the credibility of their arguments. Don't make me post Charlie Angus' twitter post again...
Duffy did get charged. Plus criminality is not the only level of wrongdoing.
And if you're looking for a non-partisan lens there's plenty of people out there, even if you decide to completely exclude newspaper columnists, who think there's something wrong here:
Of course we could get this out of the partisan realm if the government would just do the right thing call an independent inquiry instead of using their party's majority on the Justice Committee to stonewall.
And I don't see how Angus's Tweet about JWR being a poor Justice Minister is wrong. The impaired driving bill may as well have been a CPC private members bill, the Liberals haven't delivered on their promises of criminal justice reform or even rolling back mandatory minimum sentences. Though we all know this government hasn't delivered on a lot of promises, they still haven't rolled back the parts of C-51 they said they were going to.
While JWR doesn't appear to have been a good Justice Minister to me, it seems she did a good job with the Attorney General hat, at least in this case, of protecting prosecutorial independence.