Depends how rich you are. If you're super flush and can afford wasting a ton of money chasing more... go for it. If his nestegg has dwindled, but still enough to live a good life... no sense jeopardizing that chasing a lottery ticket.
The odds of hitting in this market is incredibly slim.
Somebody had that recent thread about making your dream game if someone gave you 100 million dollars. I'd pocket as much of that cash as I could (salary for me and friends and family), cause even if you hired the best, odds are it would still be a bomb and tank. This market is brutal and only embraces the mega-hits.
What he did is called scam.Considering Cliffy claims he's paid for his closed studio's co-workers medical expenses and etc., you're saying then that was the wrong decision, and that money should have been prioritized to refund poor gamers? Where do you expect the money to come from?
Like, that's over the line. Not reasonable.
My first thought as well.Jesus at that entitled tweet he responded to asking for a refund because the game didn't do well.
What he did is called scam.
He sold a product to you play online but you can't play it because it shutdown.
Do you paid for what?
The consumer has nothing to do with his game failure... the consumer should ask refund.
This is what we call a strawman argument.Considering Cliffy claims he's paid for his closed studio's co-workers medical expenses and etc., you're saying then that was the wrong decision, and that money should have been prioritized to refund poor gamers? Where do you expect the money to come from?
Like, that's over the line. Not reasonable.
You don't know what a scam is.What he did is called scam.
He sold a product to you play online but you can't play it because it shutdown.
Do you paid for what?
The consumer has nothing to do with his game failure... the consumer should ask refund.
Gamers have an entitlement issue but some of y'all get silly tripping over yourselves to run in the opposite direction. In no other industry would be be saying silly stuff like this.Also, he doesn't owe consumers anything, you buy at your own risk.
The company closed. How would they even refund?The consumer has nothing to do with his game failure... the consumer should ask refund.
Scam is when you buy a service but it is not delivered, no?
They delivered a working product, what do you (not you specifically) want?Gamers have an entitlement issue but some of y'all get silly tripping over yourselves to run in the opposite direction. In no other industry would be be saying silly stuff like this.
In another reply he mentioned restaurants. Does he own restaurants or plan to?
In the process of becoming a developer. Can confirm.As much as I don't care for Cliff, gamers sure are a bunch of entitled whiners. That tweet is not the first of its kind and is a strangely common sentiment amongst a lot of people.
Ah ha that's cool. I guess that means there is a pretty good likelihood that we won't see another major title from him again.He owns a (from what I hear) successful restaurant/bar in Raleigh. He may want to focus on expanding that business since he will have more time for it now.
Most people purchase non-consumable items with the expectation they remain useable for a period exceeding a year and one month.They delivered a working product, what do you (not you specifically) want?
I can't think of enthusiasts of any other hobby off the top of my head that feel they "deserve" as much as gamers do.As much as I don't care for Cliff, gamers sure are a bunch of entitled whiners. That tweet is not the first of its kind and is a strangely common sentiment amongst a lot of people.
This is what we call a strawman argument.
Actual statement: It's not entitled for someone to want a refund for a product that stopped working.
What you're arguing against: "Cliffy B should have refunded customers instead of paying his employees."
These are not the same thing and it's disingenuous to pretend they are.
Most people purchase non-consumable items with the expectation they remain useable for a period exceeding a year and one month.
If you want to argue he made the right decision in his priorities, that's one thing. And I would agree with it.
Arguing that it is entitled for consumers to expect their product to remain more than entirely unuseable for more than a year and one month is just plainly ludicrous.
Most people purchase non-consumable items with the expectation they remain useable for a period exceeding a year and one month.
If you want to argue he made the right decision in his priorities, that's one thing. And I would agree with it.
Arguing that it is entitled for consumers to expect their product to remain more than entirely unuseable for more than a year and one month is just plainly ludicrous.
Looks like some of his ex employees don't seem too happy and are calling bullshit on his statements about pay after they closed:
What he did is called scam.
He sold a product to you play online but you can't play it because it shutdown.
Do you paid for what?
The consumer has nothing to do with his game failure... the consumer should ask refund.