Fines aren't necessary I think, Valve should just remove Steam pages and forums of games that went exclusive to another storefront. There is really no need to have Steam pages running for Metro or Ashen for entire year. Valve could re-enable these pages a month before release date.
But you can't buy or even preorder the game so who cares? It's not a dick more even, at most it's a little sloppy.Because it's a bad look & misleading to put up a trailer advertising a 2.15.19 release date on a platform that won't be able to sell the game again until 2.15.20? It's not like it's actually evil, just kind of a dick move.
That sounds a bitter individual would do rather that how a company should act.
Pretty sure other stores just cut off the ends of trailers to not show the logos for the other storefronts if theirs is not present.Fines aren't necessary I think, Valve should just remove Steam pages and forums of games that went exclusive to another storefront. There is really no need to have Steam pages running for Metro or Ashen for entire year. Valve could re-enable these pages a month before release date.
But you can't buy or even preorder the game so who cares? It's not a dick more even, at most it's a little sloppy.
do you not have access to a VPN?I certainly cannot, same goes for many people in my country, in Argentina and China. My friend just straight said he's going to go back to the old pre Steam days and pirate it, oh well.
But why should Valve give a competing store an avenue to advertise on Steam?
Valve should make the community hub for games that jumped over to Epic like this invisible except for those who managed to preorder the game on Steam. Keeping the Steam pages public is giving free advertisement for a game exclusively available on a competing store which is stupid.
Oh for sure, I think it kind of screws Valve and it's def confusing.That's the point. It would be frustrating to see a notification about this game being available for sale, go to attempt to purchase it, only to find out it's not available on the platform of your choice (maybe you have steam wallet fund or something, idk). I imagine for some consumers that could be a little confusing.
The "dick move" parts comes in if I'm putting myself in Valve's shoes. From a consumer stand-point it's just confusing.
Pretty sure other stores just cut off the ends of trailers to not show the logos for the other storefronts if theirs is not present.
Delisting the pages seems...harsh.
Ahh, sorry wasn't aware of that. Both of those are cases where the original publisher of the steam listing no longer has the rights to the continued sales of the product, though.. aren't they (or no longer exists as an operating company)?Find me the steam page for the Wolfenstein 2009 game, or Telltale's Walking Dead games. They're gone, because they're not for sale on Steam. They have been doing this forever. If you can't buy the game on Steam, why would there be a Store page?
That sounds a bitter individual would do rather that how a company should act.
Not sure what's bitter or harsh about that. Seems like completely fair thing to do. Why should Valve pay for server upkeep when people are using Steam's forums to discuss games that are being sold on competing storefront. Steam's forums are even used for technical support for games that are being sold exclusively on EGS.Pretty sure other stores just cut off the ends of trailers to not show the logos for the other storefronts if theirs is not present.
Delisting the pages seems...harsh.
But why should Valve give a competing store an avenue to advertise on Steam?
Valve should make the community hub for games that jumped over to Epic like this invisible except for those who managed to preorder the game on Steam. Keeping the Steam pages public is giving free advertisement for a game exclusively available on a competing store which is stupid.