Love all the "Disney was being greedy!!" replies, as if anyone should just as much give a shit about how much money Sony makes off these movies.
Won't someone think of Tom Rothman!
Lmao
Love all the "Disney was being greedy!!" replies, as if anyone should just as much give a shit about how much money Sony makes off these movies.
Won't someone think of Tom Rothman!
I know right? Disney offered a shitty deal and Sony left. Too bad. But it makes sense.
That's too bad for Marvel because Sony is going to run the franchise into the dirt.
Maybe. But it's the wrong play for fans and consumers. Back to shit tastic Spiderman so they can add him to the horrible Venomverse.
I'm selling my PS4
I wonder if Tom Holland and the director are going to try to figure out how to drop out of the movies now, it's pretty fucking shitty for them too.
Kevin get on the phone to my boy Tobey right now and call him the Human Spider.
BUBUBU ARROGANT SONYDisney just asked for 10 times the stake they're getting now lol.
Yeah, doing endgame without Spiderman locked down for the next phase is a really really weird decisionIn what world do you think the current MCU doesn't need Spidey????!
Even better; they call up Tobey to play Ben Reilly as the Scarlet Spider
In what world do you think the current MCU doesn't need Spidey????!
So does this mean Happy is definitely breaking up with Aunt May?
This would have had Disney putting up more money for more involvement in Spider-Man as a whole; in a sense, they'd be helping with Venom and stuff like it, as well as benefitting from the other effects of co-financing that I have talked about in the rest of the thread.
In other words, Sony killed this because they don't want their deal with Disney extending past the core Spider-Man movies or for them to get anything out of the stuff like Venom or Spider-verse beyond the merchandising they already get. Disney wanted to invest more in the character and the franchise, and yes, this would have come with more of a financial gain for them... but in a way that is still balanced HEAVILY in Sony's favor.
Sony wants all of the money instead of most of it, and to hold onto as much creative control as they can. Creative control that they've shown they're more likely to squander in spite of the talent attached to it. They're cutting off their nose to spite their face - especially considering that the 50 percent "opening swing" was something EVERY company does at the start of negotiations and usually get talked down from.
Sony turned that offer down flat, and I don't believe they even came back to the table to figure out a compromise. Led by Tom Rothman and Tony Vinciquerra, Sony just simply didn't want to share its biggest franchise.
Now watch as the Spider-Man movies become great again but reviewed lower than previous 2 movies because they are not marvel
I don' think Disney shills exist in the traditional sense. Reality itself is a MCU shill at this point.Yea I need to see more details but people are fooling themselves if they're thinking Disney didn't ask for too much in some way which caused Sony to say no dice. There are Disney shills all over Era though so no surprise.
isnt holland going to be nate drake in those uncharted movies? cant imagine he'll make sony upsetTruly, integrating him so hard into the MCU was a bad bad move.
At the same time, Sony is making an even worse move here. They're way underestimating how important those sequels being MCU are. I wonder if Tom Holland and the director are going to try to figure out how to drop out of the movies now, it's pretty fucking shitty for them too.
Hilarious watching all the marvel fanboys blame sony here when disney wanted 50%. That is hilariously insane.
So many Disney stans in this thread. How could you possibly blame Sony for not bending over backwards for Disney? It doesn't make any sense to split the profits when your the one footing the bill for the whole project.
In what world do you think the current MCU doesn't need Spidey????!
BUBUBU ARROGANT SONY
The Disney shilling in Era has never been more evident than in this thread.
Well Bye. time to elevate and get other heroes more screentime. We got The X-Men!
I mean x men in games weren't related to the movie deal either. But Marvel was angry and petty. I dont put anything past them they have already shown the behaviour before.Nah the two deals aren't related. Disney loves money and Spiderman PS4 sold a ton of copies. They aren't going to risk those sales.
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say, post Iron Man and Cap America, Marvel Studios arguably needs Spidey more than Sony does.
Well, if Sony is going through a tantrum and as a result going to damage his career... I can see it happening? Maybe? I can def see the director bowing out.isnt holland going to be nate drake in those uncharted movies? cant imagine he'll make sony upset
With Captain Marvel and Black panther making a billion they don't.I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say, post Iron Man and Cap America, Marvel Studios arguably needs Spidey more than Sony does.
Yes, but it still made buttloads of money.
Difference is that Spider-man can stand on its own as a franchise.This is such a dumb discredit to the character. It's like watching Civil War and going "No more Avengers crap in my CAPTAIN AMERICA films..."
I bet there's people happy who will be happy about MJ being a white redhead again too.