The classic nurture vs. nature argument. I have seen the argument here that people are born good or evil, or at least that some are born with sociopathic traits that others do not. I am not really convinced by this argument. I think that social influences/factors are a very crucial aspect to the development of the human, and indeed as our brains develop for the first few decades of our life they are very malleable to outside influence.
I think where this distinction is important, is how it'd affect decisions made as to how to deal with the wrongs of our society. If it is indeed the truth that there are just naturally bad people, it would mean that we'd have to accept that people will fall through the cracks and that we have to keep finding them and keep them locked up to avoid disruption. On the other hand, if you believe the idea that people are driven to it by societal influences, the solution would be to change society in a way that would not encourage this sort of behaviour to fester.
I think where this distinction is important, is how it'd affect decisions made as to how to deal with the wrongs of our society. If it is indeed the truth that there are just naturally bad people, it would mean that we'd have to accept that people will fall through the cracks and that we have to keep finding them and keep them locked up to avoid disruption. On the other hand, if you believe the idea that people are driven to it by societal influences, the solution would be to change society in a way that would not encourage this sort of behaviour to fester.