Very excited for "73 Yards" though I kinda bristle at the 'uncomplicated silliness' description for Space Babies/Devil's Chord, hahaha.
The sad thing about Chibnall is that he can be a good showrunner.
Chibnall created Broadchurch, which was a very quality show. It also starred David Tennant AND Jodie Whitaker.
But I think Doctor Who just doesn't fit his writing style.
Well 3 if you include the stupid episode with the singing goblins.Oh hey, the two lighter episodes to fully establish the Ruby/Doctor relationship weren't indicative of the tone of the entire season of a show which has historically had radically different stories within a single season? I for one am shocked.
But if you think about how the show was handled during Classic Who surely anyone should be able to take over as show runner even if they haven't had any experience writing for Doctor Who before.This is why I'm not thrilled with 6 out of the 8 episodes being written by RTD.
Because RTD needs to develop a younger team of writers who can take the show over after he (eventually) leaves.
I guess Kate Heron could be a potential future showrunner? Other than Moffat, she's the only other writer on this first series with Ncuti Gatwa.
I mean, let's be honest, the first season of Broadchurch is good, inasmuch as its a fairly standard murder mystery. S2 and 3 (and David Tennant's questionable accent in that American remake) aren't nearly as successful.
It simply doesn't work that way any more - that was representative of a whole system of making drama that the BBC used to use that's been defunct for decades. You don't have staff producers being rotated between BBC shows any more.But if you think about how the show was handled during Classic Who surely anyone should be able to take over as show runner even if they haven't had any experience writing for Doctor Who before.
I find it funny that people take such offense at the singing goblins. I personally found the whole thing charming.
Think it's worth noting that Doctor Who credits aren't necessarily the rubric that the BBC will be using to decide who'll be taking over, mind - experience running high-end drama is far more important. The writers who've done that and who'd be interested in running Doctor Who have generally already written for it, but it's not a pre-requisite - before they brought RTD back on board, they tried very hard to get Sally Wainwright to run the show, but she wasn't interested.I think chances are RTD's successor has probably already written for the show, tbh. It is important they nurture new writers in this era, but realistically, it'd probably end up being somebody like Toby Whithouse, Jamie Mathieson, Peter Harness... these are people that have written as many episodes as Moffat had when he took over. They're all 10+ years younger than Moff/RTD as well.
I don't know - I liked Being Human just fine back in the day, but he was pretty palpably running out of Doctor Who juice by the time of Under the Lake, and I don't think he'd have emulated the positive aspects of the Chibnall era (casting Jodie, widening diversity in front of and behind the camera) in the least.tbh Toby Whithouse would've been my choice over Chibnall, and the show probably would've been better off had that been the case
Please, God, no.
Think it's worth noting that Doctor Who credits aren't necessarily the rubric that the BBC will be using to decide who'll be taking over, mind - experience running high-end drama is far more important. The writers who've done that and who'd be interested in running Doctor Who have generally already written for it, but it's not a pre-requisite - before they brought RTD back on board, they tried very hard to get Sally Wainwright to run the show, but she wasn't interested.
Like, Jamie Mathieson wrote some excellent Capaldi stories, but he has absolutely no experience in running a show anywhere near the size, scale and importance of something like Doctor Who - would the BBC really hand the keys of the kingdom over to someone like that?
I do think that Harness is a substantially better candidate now than he was the last time the decision was made, what with Constellation and all, but I don't think any of the other modern series writers are in the ascendency enough to be an attractive choice - Gatiss is maybe the only exception, and he's made it clear he's got no interest.
DOCTOR WHO
I do hope that RTD sticks with Ncuti Gatwa and we get a 4/5 season run with 8 episodes.I think it's very possible Ncuti will be in the role for 5-6 yearsIt's kinda depressing people are talking about the next showrunner only halfway into RTD's first one on the return. By all rights we could be getting another five years of RTD. Think we're jumping the gun a bit here with this talk. I know it's too late to impact S2 but I do hope for S3 they add more guest writers. I think it's important. Looking at the first RTD era, that variety in writers helped a lot.
I think it's very possible Ncuti will be in the role for 5-6 years
Well as said, S2 does have more guest writers :)It's kinda depressing people are talking about the next showrunner only halfway into RTD's first one on the return. By all rights we could be getting another five years of RTD. Think we're jumping the gun a bit here with this talk. I know it's too late to impact S2 but I do hope for S3 they add more guest writers. I think it's important. Looking at the first RTD era, that variety in writers helped a lot.
Same,I get the impression that Ncuti wants to stay around for a while and I think will end up leaving when RTD leavesI really hope Ncuti's breaks the 3 season/year rule as the Doctor and NO, not by being just a 2 season Doctor
It's kinda depressing people are talking about the next showrunner only halfway into RTD's first one on the return. By all rights we could be getting another five years of RTD. Think we're jumping the gun a bit here with this talk. I know it's too late to impact S2 but I do hope for S3 they add more guest writers. I think it's important. Looking at the first RTD era, that variety in writers helped a lot.
She's directing big Hollywood movies nowadays - I'd be surprised if Who could get her.I could see them pursuing Kate Herron for the big job, after she did Loki S1. Depends how her episode turns out, mind. (Surely she'll be writing more in the future too?)
DOCTOR WHO
Directed by Nicholas Briggs
Written by Nicholas Briggs
Staring Nicholas Briggs as 'The Doctor'
And Nicholas Briggs as 'The Daleks'
Also Nicholas Briggs as 'The Cybermen'
Introducing Nicholas Briggs as 'Nick, the Best Companion'
A Nicholas Briggs Production
This is Vinay Patel erasure, and I won't have it.The showrunner is obviously incredibly important but one of the issues with the Chibnall era is that none of his writing staff stepped up either. There was no Moffat to pull an amazing episode out of nowhere and that created a situation where there was also no clear successor.
I like Moffat more than RTdD and glad he is back but I also think RTD would be smart to heavily push young talented writers as much as possible.
It's a real double-edged sword. Chibnall brought in a lot of new writers for the show and tried to push things in different directions for the first time since 2005. Which was great and exactly what the show needed (and still does) but none of the people had experience with the show before. So it meant that Chibnall, who was already a much slower writer that Davies or Moffat, was spread too thin.The showrunner is obviously incredibly important but one of the issues with the Chibnall era is that none of his writing staff stepped up either. There was no Moffat to pull an amazing episode out of nowhere and that created a situation where there was also no clear successor.
I like Moffat more than RTdD and glad he is back but I also think RTD would be smart to heavily push young talented writers as much as possible.
He also doesn't need to work from scratch. They've already brought back directors from the Moffat and Chibnall eras, I'd love to see that extended to writers as well. There's people from both of those eras I'd love to see write more for the show.Davies has been making encouraging noises about having a more diverse writing staff onboard for series 2 now that they've got their processes down, and I imagine that any spin-offs will be used as a test-bed for new talent like they were last time too, so I guess we'll see what they've got up their sleeves.
I'm surprised he never ended up writing under Chibnall considering how much he loves Thirteen. Other than the short story he did during Covid.I just want Paul Cornell to agree to do another one. Moffat asked him every year!
I know who a few of the writers are and it is indeed diverse as fuck. A few first time writers, which I like—anything that gets people tv credits.Davies has been making encouraging noises about having a more diverse writing staff onboard for series 2 now that they've got their processes down, and I imagine that any spin-offs will be used as a test-bed for new talent like they were last time too, so I guess we'll see what they've got up their sleeves.
I thought that was drivel. Just nonstop weightless dialogue, a dozen surface-level ideas introduced but undeveloped, and then technobabble where the Doctor uses the concept of fatherhood to compel an AI to hack its military-industrial complex creator into submission. It's just that easy! No real arcs in character nor exploration of theme, just stuff happening at breakneck speed and name checking things you probably already have strong opinions on.
Finally caught up with the episodes in this season.
My thoughts so far: I'm annoyed at the series losing 1/3 of its episodes (from 12 to 8), it's had a pretty obvious negative effect on the pacing of the whole thing. "The Devil's Chord" was a very good episode, but some of it felt unearned due to being so early in the season. Had this been episode 4 or 5, lines like "you never hide" would've felt more organic. The same goes for Ruby and the Doctor's relationship: they're great together, but it feels like they've gotten really close way too fast, which again feels unearned.