This wraps up the first novel. Part 3 will be an adaptation of Dune Messiah, but IIRC Denis plans on taking a break from Dune between 2 and 3.For those that have seen it, does Part 2 conclude the first Dune novel, or is it setting it up for a Part 3 to conclude the first novel?
For those that have seen it, does Part 2 conclude the first Dune novel, or is it setting it up for a Part 3 to conclude the first novel?
This wraps up the first novel. Part 3 will be an adaptation of Dune Messiah, but IIRC Denis plans on taking a break from Dune between 2 and 3.
I haven't seen it but I know for a fact it concludes the first novel. If this movie has a sequel it will be an adaptation of the second book, Dune Messiah.
Sets it up for a Part 3. It doesnt really conclude so much as this phase of the story is over.For those that have seen it, does Part 2 conclude the first Dune novel, or is it setting it up for a Part 3 to conclude the first novel?
On a scale of 1 to 10, how hard does the film takes the radicalization of the Fremen?
8/10 same as first to one. A couple questions:
Why did Chani's friend stay behind to die? She was a good actress.
How did it take a regime change for the Harkonnens to think of carpet bombing the Fremen? That shouldve been the first idea
Lastly, I was confused by the final battle.
1. Where were they? The capital or the deserts
2. Did Paul dishonorably attack by surprise? The Emperor seemed not prepared at all
3. How did Rabban go from the Emperor's room to the capital streets? That was a pretty bad cut there to him and Gurney randomly somewhere else
10On a scale of 1 to 10, how hard does the film takes the radicalization of the Fremen?
10 I'm shocked they went that hardOn a scale of 1 to 10, how hard does the film takes the radicalization of the Fremen?
I was as well. That is without a doubt the core of the film.
It's almost all Denis read all the takes about Paul just being a run of the mill white savior from people unfamiler with the work and went "Hold my beer".
I somewhat agree. I'm pretty cold on Dune Part 1 and think it's his worst movie outside of Enemy. This is VASTLY better. The script is super sharp and it's a much more 'human' movie than maybe any of his other films. Really funny and heartwarming at times. Gurney and Stilgar do a lot of heavy lifting on that front.So, I didn't like the first film. As the kids say, MID at best. Introverted story telling and characters. Some beautiful visuals and a couple good set pieces. I rewatched today and after the sequel my feelings are unchanged. Arguably Villeneuve's worst and just felt like a shell of something more interesting.
This however, was really special. Laser focus story structure. Countless iconic framing. Characters you actually care about and an injection of humor. This was a really well done epic. Had a blast.
On a scale of 1 to 10, how hard does the film takes the radicalization of the Fremen?
First book is now complete but the film calls its shot on part 3, the ending is not at all conclusiveFor those that have seen it, does Part 2 conclude the first Dune novel, or is it setting it up for a Part 3 to conclude the first novel?
Just got home from a true imax 1.43 dual laser showing
Was fucking awesome. Liked it even better than the first.
Austin butler stole every single scene he was in.
5/5 tbh
He straight up looked like he was trying his hardest not to jerk off. I loved every scene he was in and was glad they gave him the screentime they did.
For those that have seen it, does Part 2 conclude the first Dune novel, or is it setting it up for a Part 3 to conclude the first novel?
The only reason this dragged for me is because the cinema was over an hour late to start. Other than that, the film did a great job pacing itself. There was only one part where I felt it may have sped ahead to fast, but it didn't skimp out of details for the audience.I'm not usually someone that feels the runtime of long movies, but I felt this one drag a bit. I think the freshness and set up of the first part helps that one move along more smoothly. Part 2 is basically 90% Fremen all the time and some monotony can set in. It's all well done, but the little bit of Irulan and Harkonnen interludes weren't enough to break up the pacing as well as part 1. The build up of Paul and the radicalization of the Fremen is worth it though, so it's kinda necessary for the story to go all in on that.
The amount of focus on the radicalization also makes Messiah super necessary for a good wrap up for this adaptation. I know it's all but confirmed , but I am honestly shocked there wasn't a "to be continued" or something at the end. It's just as open an ending as part 1.
That's kind of my feelings on the novel too. Strong start and then fades a bit, so I wasn't surprised too much.
Overall it's obviously still amazing and I could enjoy it even more with more comfortable home viewing for sure. But my initial take is that part 1 is slightly stronger but all together it's A+.
I wanted to buy the bucket but I was in a hurry. :(Also, it actually blew my mind how many people bought that fucking popcorn bucket at my theatre tonight lmao
🤣🤣🤣🤣🪱🤣🤣🤣🤣
Still processing but damn what they did with Chani's character is so fucking good. One of my biggest criticisms of the book is that she's incredibly underwritten to the point of barely feeling like a character but this really elevated her. Great performance by Zendaya too.