Pretty much, I think numerical scoring systems are dumb honestly. I prefer just a written review and a binary yes or no at most!
I think the 0-100 system works fairly well if you try to identify terrible and fantastic games.
Everything else kinda ends up in that 65-85 corridor, where a few outlier reviews can skew the average quite a bit.
At the end of the day, the difference between a 73 vs 69 or a 79 vs 81 is absolutely meaningless.
Maybe they could do a system similar to figure skating, where the 10 worst and best scores are deleted idk