1984 Epic ad
Apple is literally never going to back down from this. Spotify has tried suing apple about this for years now and nothing has come from it so far. Even if the EU rules against Apple, they are just going to comply with any ruling in the most convoluted way possible, changing literally nothing for the consumer.
Litteral nazis in the whitehouse and this is the cause he champions.
fuck all these gaming celebs
But those same people are rarely saying "Fuck Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft" either... 🤷♀️
Indeed.I think apple will surely tell at court that apple i-products are closed systems with a specified operating system, kinda like game consoles with communication options.
So, if that is a case and Epic wins, would that be the end of closed systems like Xbox, PlayStation and Nintendo?
Where is the difference?
Holy fuuuuuuuuck
Its mocking an Apple commercial "1984", I bet the majority of the Fortnite audience is under 13, so that comercial is almost 3 times their age so there is no way they get the reference.
You mean when IE was forced into Windows and there was like no support for the others? And what other competition was there at the time... Apple? Wasn't even close to being the same size or comparison in any way to what we're dealing with today. Not at all.
This is the worst fucking timeline
Its based on scope of the device. It would not be the first kind of restriction based on target market.
Litteral nazis in the whitehouse and this is the cause he champions.
fuck all these gaming celebs
Lmaoooo so they can take a cut 15% cut besides Apple. Okay I'm out epic reasoning is bullshit.Epic's stance goes further than that, and is now "we want to build our own App Store on iOS".
It seems like all of this is a deliberate campaign to challenge Apple's monetization concept. I guess they fully expected to be removed from the storeI'm kind of impressed with how quickly they pulled that together above anything else.
This is incredibly corny.
So say this leads to 15% cut for Apple, Sony, MS, Nintendo, et al.
Does this mean we can expect less R&D investment in hardware, more expensive hardware and less powerful hardware from all to adjust for the lower return?
Ok. COD 2022 now is a free download but you can only play a short demo unless you pay Activision $80 directly through their payment portal. Console holders get nothing, players get nothing, developers in the trenches get nothing, Kotick gets a new private jet.For me, I understand Apple, Google and all the others having certain charges. Apple charges to join the Dev program, the console makers charge for Dev kits, I think it makes sense to give their stores a cut for selling your product.. but once your product is in the user's hands it does seem unethical to me to prevent the developer having an ongoing relationship with the user without using the company who owns the platform. There needs to be a clear ruling on this, my gut feeling is that software and software expansions run on the hardware - must pass verification on the hardware, therefore platform holder can validly gatekeep it... But for digital goods, cosmetic shit, season tickets, service fees etc. they shouldn't get shit. The developer is putting time in to add value and make a profit from their product, the platform holder should get out of the way and the let the users and the market decide if that's ok. Taking a cut just makes it more expensive for the user and harder for the developer to monetise their own hard work.
I think apple will surely tell at court that apple i-products are closed systems with a specified operating system, kinda like game consoles with communication options.
So, if that is a case and Epic wins, would that be the end of closed systems like Xbox, PlayStation and Nintendo?
Where is the difference?
They made that shit ahead of time. They knew exactly what was gonna happen.I'm kind of impressed with how quickly they pulled that together above anything else.
I'm not even sure who I want to win this, but it seems like Epic doesn't have much of a foot to stand on legally.
Ahhhh that'd make sense - that they were sort of planning for this to happen.It seems like all of this is a deliberate campaign to challenge Apple's monetization concept
This was planned for a while, they filed legal papers and everything todayI'm kind of impressed with how quickly they pulled that together above anything else.