It can't be thicker as it needs to retain compatibility with the Joy-Cons. But i've noticed that in the trailer it does seems a little thicker. Might be imagination.I noticed it seems to be heavier. Is it slightly thicker as well?
It can't be thicker as it needs to retain compatibility with the Joy-Cons. But i've noticed that in the trailer it does seems a little thicker. Might be imagination.I noticed it seems to be heavier. Is it slightly thicker as well?
I agree. If there is a DLSS switch coming down the pipeline I couldn't see them pricing it lower than $450 given this OLED model's pricing.Let me put it this way: I don't see Nintendo putting out a more powerful sku for just $50 more than the OLED sku when they consider the OLED sku, which is a rather tiny revision (I'd argue less significant than Switch V2 was compared to Switch V1), to be worth a $50 price increase. As such, I am very skeptical of a more powerful device (the one that allegedly has DLSS) coming withing 12 months that is priced below $400.
I kinda doubt that'll be the case with Bloomberg which I assume will have to release an article clarifying what happened to some extent.Some "insiders" will just say "Uuuh that's weird that's totally not the info I have, let me check with my sources", disappear for 2 months then come back with new, unrelated rumors and we'll have all forgotten about this.
True, and I would bet something else is in the pipeline. Question is if it's just a successor model or some other revision. I'm suspecting more of the former at this point.Doing a Star Fox Grand Prix with a hardware model is quite a bit harder as you need to get NVIDIA along for the ride, since we have information about a mobile chip for a Pro device actually existing from people with sources inside NVIDIA. Nintendo are good, but I doubt they can fake a hardware chip as easily as they can a game.
The worst case scenario would be that it's just a Switch XL. Innards are completely the same, but we get the 7" OLED display.
Not really, because a new chip is basically all but confirmed.
🤡🤡🤡
that's what I'm curious about. wonder if Kopite7Kimi will comment on thisDoing a Star Fox Grand Prix with a hardware model is quite a bit harder as you need to get NVIDIA along for the ride, since we have information about a mobile chip for a Pro device actually existing from people with sources inside NVIDIA. Nintendo are good, but I doubt they can fake a hardware chip as easily as they can a game.
Nintendo is so fucking out of touch. They are promoting a system with an OLED display, and basically nothing else, as if it's this amazing new revolution. And it's a low quality OLED panel at that.
Awful.
Small new Switch iterations every 2 years
2017: Original
2019: Better Battery
2021: OLED screen
THIS is what Iwata meant, not completely new powerful hardware.
Isn't that more or less what happened with the Lite?Silently dropping a trailer on a Tuesday is not what I'd call promoting.
The worst case scenario would be that it's just a Switch XL. Innards are completely the same, but we get the 7" OLED display.
Do we have any further information about the specs of the OLED panel?Nintendo is so fucking out of touch. They are promoting a system with an OLED display, and basically nothing else, as if it's this amazing new revolution. And it's a low quality OLED panel at that.
Awful.
That's what they already were doing with DS and 3DS, right?Small new Switch iterations every 2 years
2017: Original
2019: Better Battery
2021: OLED screen
THIS is what Iwata meant, not completely new powerful hardware.
Supposedly they did that before with Star Fox Grand Prix, but I'd bet there were two separate Switch models all along and insiders were unknowingly mixing the two up.
dont forget the 32GB more storage and 50$ price increase....Laughable if that's the case. 4.5 years later and we get a slightly better battery and a low quality OLED screen.
I have no idea what they're doing.
Not all price increments are created equal. The higher the price to start with, the more significant each additional dollar needs to be in perceived consumer value. You can't just translate what Nintendo "thinks $50 is worth" from this model to a more expensive one, for them it's about production cost and successful marketing, not being consistent.Let me put it this way: I don't see Nintendo putting out a more powerful sku for just $50 more than the OLED sku when they consider the OLED sku, which is a rather tiny revision (I'd argue less significant than Switch V2 was compared to Switch V1), to be worth a $50 price increase. As such, I am very skeptical of a more powerful device (the one that allegedly has DLSS) coming withing 12 months that is priced below $400.
Its a heavily produced Comercial trailer, with game fotage from games anouced at E3. This was never planed for befor E3, this takes weeks to prepare. It was probably being cut before and during E3, thats why some expected it to drop then, not thinking that such productions need way more time.I feel so stupid. I should've caught on something was very wrong when no announcement was made prior to E3 despite sources saying it was 'imminent' due to game announcements that were pro enhanced/exclusive.
This goes beyond the 'plans changed' excuse because you don't just change hardware plans on such short notice. I'm absolutely shocked that Bloomberg seemed to have been conned by seemingly false info.
Looking forward to the next Nate The Hate podcast.
Damn, y'all show up like clockwork.Shouldn't we ban all those 4k insiders ? Jason , Emily, Bloomberg etc
Doing a Star Fox Grand Prix with a hardware model is quite a bit harder as you need to get NVIDIA along for the ride, since we have information about a mobile chip for a Pro device actually existing from people with sources inside NVIDIA. Nintendo are good, but I doubt they can fake a hardware chip as easily as they can a game.
exact same thickness as current switch, full specs are on the UK site (theres a tab for front/back...its in the back part): https://www.nintendo.co.uk/Nintendo...del-/Nintendo-Switch-OLED-model--2000984.htmlI noticed it seems to be heavier. Is it slightly thicker as well?
I didn't realise Bloomberg had an Era account tbh.Shouldn't we ban all those 4k insiders ? Jason , Emily, Bloomberg etc
Hmm, must be the color scheme then.exact same thickness as current switch, full specs are on the UK site (theres a tab for front/back...its in the back part): https://www.nintendo.co.uk/Nintendo...del-/Nintendo-Switch-OLED-model--2000984.html
enthusiast forum vs mass market audience does that. just look at Pokemon here vs outside the bubbleThere's not a whole lot of dislikes so people seam to be eating this up, as much as we all here just collapsed
The majority of people didn't seem to believe in the pro outside of Era so they don't have much to be disappointed by haha.There's not a whole lot of dislikes so people seam to be eating this up, as much as we all here just collapsed
So it's just a Oled version of v2 and with 64GB storage and a few tweaks here and there and for $49 more? Seems a bit excessive when costs for the Switch have gone down
Very disappointed but I guess the next Switch will come out 2023 then.
Oh well my Switch battery is bad but I will upgrade to this
There's not a whole lot of dislikes so people seam to be eating this up, as much as we all here just collapsed
Selling a lot of Switches. Remember you are living in a bubble and the average buyer doesn't care about all the specs. It plays games it does it work.Laughable if that's the case. 4.5 years later and we get a slightly better battery and a low quality OLED screen.
I have no idea what they're doing.