Nothing? I mean i am no pr, normal townie who wants to win the game.
Only player atm that is 100 % trustworthy is Faddy and that is also taken with a grain of salt since he can be wrong aswell sometimes.
Game of Thrones Mafia - We're All Bastards Here
- Thread starter Natiko
- Start date
Nothing? I mean i am no pr, normal townie who wants to win the game.
Only player atm that is 100 % trustworthy is Faddy and that is also taken with a grain of salt since he can be wrong aswell sometimes.
Well for one thing D1 I was happy to lynch Blarg off of the island straight away, Dude was weird and non-towny from the jump. But FEP apparently thought it was better to lynch Exodus. Whoops. Now maybe that's an innocent mistake or maybe there's something more there.
looking at the voting tool he jump from Blarg to Kits and then settled on Exodus when that seemed to be the way the wind was blowing. Town switching from Blarg to exodus was scum's first major win this game so those votes need to be analyzed.
Gladly.
Mmmmk, just going to keep this here and then return to at after I look back on your D5.
Meatwad's first post of D5, joking in response to Stanley saying that to win the religion a town member needed to make anti-town plays, referring to previous events in this game. However, even as a joke, we have a Vanilla Town claim here. Possibly recruited by Blarg?
Here we see Blarg post some sad songs. Meatwad decides to join in with his pal and start singing:
Next up, Blarg makes his claim. Being a newbie, I was a bit confused by what "Neutral Survivor" meant.
Meatwad tells me that it is "functionally town" but that it can be "treated as neutral". What? A neutral survivor is by definition a neutral, they are not "functionally town".
Here is Meatwad basically copying my read list from D5. Almost no difference at all.
Some more joking around with his pal, Blarg.
And then this whole interaction with (possible scum pal) Kitsune. This is some of the most activity Meatwad has had on D5 to this point, and it was to talk about absolutely nothing related to the game.
He copied the shit out of them.
Says we should be careful about lynching GoG, let's not turbo. But offers no other suggestions.
Now Apollo, our dearly departed mystery man, had some things to say about Meatwad on D5.
Meatwad's response:
Next up, Faddy decides to place a vote on Kits.
Which Meatwad immediately took interest in. Wondering why someone would vote for his (possible) scum pal?
No regrets over killing Melon, even though she had a very useful role for the town. Like, I'm pretty sure I would vote for her again, but to say no regrets? Nah, I have regrets, I wish it didn't go down like that.
Goes back to point at Exodus voters after people start pointing out him switching from Kits to Blarg (when Blarg's train had all but died) on D1.
This is probably the most substantial thing Meatwad did on D5 was provide some thoughts on the Exodus D1 voters.
GoG asks for more, Meatwad promises it's coming later.
Stan, quoting the previous two posts:
And Blarg's input:
Apollo once again brings some questions to Meatwad.
Meatwad never answered to any of these points.
Here, Meatwad quotes me talking about what I brought up earlier, the post about him saying that Blarg's claim of neutral survivor is "functionally town" which he says was most certainly not him defending Blarg.
Dr. Monkey agrees, it is weird to say that about that role.
Girlofgotham prods Meatwad to give her his thoughts on today, since he promised they were coming when he got back.
He comes back with more talk about Exodus voters, comparing the votes for him against the other successful lynch votes.
Girlofgotham rightly points out that this really doesn't have anything to do with today, which is what she was asking for his thoughts on.
Meatwad doesn't buy the protector claim and thinks that Giant Panda is scum and that FEPs is not.
He then later rolls his eyes at Apollo for saying that he would be more than happy to lynch Meatwad today if anyone else wanted to. He then incorrectly formats his vote for Girlofgotham, someone he never mentioned wanting to vote for here today, in fact he wanted to not turbo her and instead wanted to spend the day doing other scum hunting. He just said he thinks Giant Panda is scum. Both Include and Nin have votes on Giant Panda. But he votes for Girlofgotham.
And then when the time is about to run out, he once again incorrectly formats his vote for Girlofgotham, but it was definitely going there in the end along with the rest of the people who jumped on the train with 2 minutes to go.
So, back to that post from just now:
You definitely were cozying up to Blarg, you were singing sad songs with him, telling his neutral role claim is "functionally town", and never once considered a vote on him even after me and Faddy were pushing hard for it. Everyone else seems to have at least considered it, but you never once did.
And really, for you it seemed more like a choice between Giant Panda, your scum read, and Girlofgotham, who you barely mentioned on D5. You never once mentioned being between "scummy Blarg" and "scummy GOG", you thought Giant Panda was scum but you voted GOG in the end.
Do it. I'm no hypocrite. Stop when you realize you're wasting your time
I'm almost finished with CeeCee/nin. Gonna do kits/ET, Indy/Trigger, Meatwad, and Kopite - I figure that's a fair pool at this point. There is scum in there. nin just claimed VT, I see, so we can add that to the list of claims.
Re: some game speculation: I think the only game I've played with a recruit mechanic was Heroes vs Villains and I wouldn't use that as a measure. The recruit ability here was 3-shot - but there's no way they could get three, right? There has to be a limit? Unless scum team started pretty small? I'm asking because we should probably try to figure out how many we have left.
Re: some game speculation: I think the only game I've played with a recruit mechanic was Heroes vs Villains and I wouldn't use that as a measure. The recruit ability here was 3-shot - but there's no way they could get three, right? There has to be a limit? Unless scum team started pretty small? I'm asking because we should probably try to figure out how many we have left.
Yes survivor is functionally town because their imperative in the game is to Survive and a survivor is more likely to do that by helping town. It's a neutral role yes but a survivor gains nothing by playing in a way detrimental to town. That's why the role is functionally town. That and the song lyrics I posted were not at all in response to anything Blarg said or posted. You're really grasping at straws here and just reading whatever you want into the most minor of things
faddy -monkey
monkey - nin
nin -?
fan - meat
meat - feps
feps - fan, trigger, gp
anyone else?
ideally, everyone but Faddy gets a deep read.
feel free to steal my targets, but I'll read anyone who does
monkey - nin
nin -?
fan - meat
meat - feps
feps - fan, trigger, gp
anyone else?
ideally, everyone but Faddy gets a deep read.
feel free to steal my targets, but I'll read anyone who does
No, survivor is functionally a kingmaker and it absolutely depends on reading the game and responding in such a way that allows you to survive.
I agree the song lyric thing is a stretch tho.
May be a bit before I can post these analyses - I've got to run some errands that can only be done today, but tonight/tomorrow are light days for me - just writing. Always writing.
I agree the song lyric thing is a stretch tho.
May be a bit before I can post these analyses - I've got to run some errands that can only be done today, but tonight/tomorrow are light days for me - just writing. Always writing.
Maybe I'm wrong in how I interpret the role but my point is that wasn't done as some defense of Blarg. Blarg made the claim and Fantomas asked and then I explained my honest interpretation of it for clarity's sake so we could figure out just what the hell Blarg was getting at in the first place.
You want Faddy to do a deep read of me?
Real talk, if you want a fresh perspective, why would you ask that? Or maybe you don't want a fresh perspective? Same for me reading nin, really; I'm already doing it and already have him in my scum pool; wouldn't it be better for me to look at someone I'm not already looking at, if we're making assignments? To help against bias, etc., since it ain't like any of us are above being susceptible.
Anyway, I'll be back in a few hours. I'm doing nin anyway, so I'll have that for you, boss feps.
Meatwad what about your scum reads and vote on D5? You scum read Giant Panda. He had 2 votes on him. Yet, you decided to go for the GOG train. And also, you said today it was between Blarg and GOG for you on D5, but you never mentioned wanting to vote for Blarg on D5, only that you thought Giant Panda was scum.
Like these reads being entrusted to approved geniuses. Do your best and be judged ultimately on the flips. No pressure
I'll admit, the "cozying up to Blarg" thing is all based on me assuming Meatwad is scum and then reading intent in posts where there could be none. However, I think I make some other valid points in that recap of his D5 play as well which point to some odd behavior in my opinion.
Seems 2 shot to me. N1 and N2 only. I'd bet scum started with 3 or 4 people. If I had to bet, I'd bet on 4. Starting with 5 in a game that also had an SK like role, and having the ability to get to 7 would be OP. Starting with 2 is way to small.Blarg's Role said:
Giant Panda
I swear to God, i will do my damnedest to lynch you if you keep ignoring me.
who were your targets the last two days?
I swear to God, i will do my damnedest to lynch you if you keep ignoring me.
who were your targets the last two days?
I also think Meatwad is the scummiest player we have. Yesterday I already noted that Meatwad tried twice to vote for GoG late on Day 5 when it still looked close between Blarg and GoG. And I am totally scum-reading the "accidental" phrase "we'd be closer to winning" if GoG lived and killed again.
Day 1 is flimsier evidence, but Meatwad switched a vote from Kits to Blarg late in the day, after it was clear Blarg was fairly safe. Perhaps a weak attempt at a bus, though it is hard to say if Meatwad was scum then or if he was recruited later.
Vote: Meatwad
Day 1 is flimsier evidence, but Meatwad switched a vote from Kits to Blarg late in the day, after it was clear Blarg was fairly safe. Perhaps a weak attempt at a bus, though it is hard to say if Meatwad was scum then or if he was recruited later.
Vote: Meatwad
What happened to "don't say anything" that you were pushing yesterday?
While we are all patting ourselves on the back for finally lynching Blarg. I would just like to post my amazing day 1 meta read.
And let's just continue in that vein
VOTE: Extreme Tactician
And let's just continue in that vein
VOTE: Extreme Tactician
I'm sorry, did you think you had a forever get-out-of-jail-free card???????
Not how it works. What the fuck good are you or did you try to be?
I agree. You have more than enough town cred with the deathless night (and other subsequent 1 death nights) to believe you have got a save.
So do what you want and FEP can get over himself.
Well know I didn't mention that aloud but it's what I was thinking. Giant Panda was a scum read but not strong enough of one for me to act on. But honestly if I was scum buddies with Blarg why would I openly buddy up to him or even give that kind of appearance openly to town. Scum typically try to avoid each other not engage each other in sing song or other nonsense.
But yes I don't state everything I'm thinking openly in the thread but I can honestly say that if not for GOG and the questions surrounding her my vote would have landed on Blarg. The whole reason I voted Blarg day 6 is because he was already my day 5 runner up and he did even less day 6 to convince me or anyone that he wasn't scum
Go find some of these Blarg posts for me that you think clear you please.
If you have good interactions it is a strong point for you imo
But it didn't.
I mean in the end the fact of the matter is that the vote was not put on Blargy.
:(
Well, I for one would like to hear what you are thinking. I don't really expect anyone to give a shit what my thoughts are, but I feel like it helps to have them all out on the table at least. Because the problem here now is that I can point to you never having said any of that stuff on D5, so it becomes kind of suspicious to me for you to retroactively make those your thoughts when you didn't share them with us at the time.
Yeah but we got the serial killer so what's your point?
In the end Blarg and Gog were taken care of, that's a win for town
I already explained it's better Gog went first so that she was stopped from killing. Lynching Blarg wouldn't have prevented a NK
It's been a day. How long are you expecting people to believe you? You obviously didn't use your shot on faddy last night or else ketkat would be alive. Explain yourself.
Nah.
Nah.
Faddy is confirmed but he is absolute shit for everything. I would have lynched him ages ago if he wasn't so rock-solidly cleared, god bless us all.
How many times has faddy cried about how he's soooooo smart but no one listens to him. Maybe he's right. I don't think so. I think his lynches would just be follow faddy logic down faddy dead ends to bullshit conclusions for mislynches. Mine follow reason and have lynched a Sk and Mafia while Faddy wants to brag about how he would have lynched a scum earlier and that's it. Actively talked against the SK. He's not following game logic, he's following self-serving messiah complex bullshit.
And he cries about how no one listens. I don't. Because 5/6 of my preferred targets got lynched, for better or for worse. If nothing else, I'm trying. Faddy is bringing up half baked bullshit based on personal feels that convince no one. As I said before, we can trust he isn't trying to trick us but that's about it. The only read of his that has panned out is Blarg and I've been calling him scum the whole game.
GP.
I can't guarantee a lynch, but the only time my target has been stymied was by a lover claim while I was sleeping. I will do my damndest to get you lynched if you aren't forward. Just as with dubs, this isn't hateful. I could make a case for you just as easily as I will make one against you. But you need to answer.
Nah FEP. mafia are some of town have listened to you half baked reads and you ended up killing a whole lot of town.
Giant Panda is confirmed town.
Faddy has been 100% confirmed for days now and you are still being wishy washy about him?
How come you are not scum reading Fantomas then? According to your logic he shouldn't be into your "unknown" category but on the scum lean.
Yet that's exactly what you have been doing today, the only reason I see you doing that is because we were talking about you being our lynch target today.
In Heroes vs Villains, you were our doctor and you put less effort into appearing town than what you are doing here. You are usually more nonchalant in your gameplay but somehow today you are acting more serious and more engaged, it doesn't help that you keep on contradicting yourself and trying to distract me from focusing on you which makes me even more wary of you to be honest.
I feel like you are trying very hard to latch on other people's targets and appearing engaged by doing so.
I ended up killing who I wanted killed. According to your rules, I'm either mafia or monkey os or else shut the fuck up and apologize to everyone which you ought to do anyway.
I am not even trying tbh.
I had no intention to sway you away from me. You can keep the tunnel, but while Zou are at it don't forget to look right and left sometimes.
My target has been set include
Has yours aswell ?
Just wanted to add this, since it made me laugh.
Can't make. Everyone happy can i :p
He has both voted for me and said he wants me dead, yet apparently I'm "unknown" now and not scummy like he used to think. And apparently he is leaning scum on 6/11 of the players left in the game now?
Dont worry i still want you dead, me not putting you on the scum list does not mean that I want you to see me as an ally.
If the chance happens I would gladly vote you out today :)