This is so good! They are really pressing their questions in a way that he apparently wasn't prepared for.
Imagine being outsmarted by a 10 year old rhetorically while trying to become Bundeskanzler.
I dont really see the reasoning here. FDP couldnt be much more away from domestic policies in comparison to Die Linke. Grüne or SPD are much closer alternatives.Preventing an Anti-NATO, Pro-Russian party of becoming a member of the next government is all the motivation I need to vote for FDP.
Hoping for the Ampel under Scholz.
Although I'm not sure if I'm ready for a man as Frau Bundeskanzlerin.
I dont really see the reasoning here. FDP couldnt be much more away from domestic policies in comparison to Die Linke. Grüne or SPD are much closer alternatives.
The end result is even stranger to want if you're only concerned about Die Linke foreign policy.
Ampel = Watered down social policies and climate policies we desperately need
RGR = Die Linke as junior partner wont be able to change anything regarding our Nato membership, and probably also nothing in regards to our relations to Russia. Very much doubt Die Linke want or would get the Außenministerium as junior partner.
So yeah, I dont really get it.
I have no idea why Laschet feels like he needs to play nice with Maaßen. Unless it's all just insidious fishing for far right votes.
You're thinking of Jamaika. Ampel (red-yellow-green) swaps out the CDU for the SPD.Me too.
Nothing points to Greens and CDU being compatible. The political agenda is different, the idea of the social state is different, the urgency in climate change is different, tax ideas are different, reformation ideas are different. EVERYTHING is incompatible. I do not even understand why Ampel is being talked about as a logical possibility by our media.
I voted green, I'd feel betrayed by Ampel (Coalition of Greens, conservative CDU, economically liberal FDP)
You're thinking of Jamaika. Ampel (red-yellow-green) swaps out the CDU for the SPD.
Voting SPD means they have free choice. That's why i dont vote for them because they made the wrong choices in the past.This is also where I am currently at, not sure who to vote for though. FDP just seems at odds with SPD and Grüne on basically every topic.
I still don't know, who I should vote, since I don't like Scholz and don't trust him to really work towards what he is promising and I am scared of the greens having to choose between RGR and Jamaica and going with the latter.
Totally agreeI dont really see the reasoning here. FDP couldnt be much more away from domestic policies in comparison to Die Linke. Grüne or SPD are much closer alternatives.
The end result is even stranger to want if you're only concerned about Die Linke foreign policy.
Ampel = Watered down social policies and climate policies we desperately need
RGR = Die Linke as junior partner wont be able to change anything regarding our Nato membership, and probably also nothing in regards to our relations to Russia. Very much doubt Die Linke want or would get the Außenministerium as junior partner.
So yeah, I dont really get it.
I only see posters from those MLPD fucknuts here and there. But then again, I don't live in a bigger cityIs anyone else seeing more DKP posters popping up in their area? They never really bothered before, but now they somehow have more local presence than the CDU.
Oh yeah, something I'm a fan of and funny enough is something firends and I discussed a few year back is creating a better european train network
with bullet trains all over the continent only stopping at major cities to standardize the infrastructure, use all that interest free money to invest and
create jobs and strengthen the EU has now somewhat popped up as an proposal by The Grüne.
They wanna create an european wide night train network, to minimize the use of planes which I think is great. Sure it would benefit Germany as the central country in Europe but imagine traveling from one major city to the other without all the check in shit at any airport and arriving at your destination the next morning.
Absolutely. But with a rising CO2-price and if they would end to subsidize kerosene, this might come trueThe important thing is for pricing to be really competitive. If it costs the same or more than a plane ride, while being longer it would be an awful alternative.
Oh yeah, something I'm a fan of and funny enough is something firends and I discussed a few year back is creating a better european train network
with bullet trains all over the continent only stopping at major cities to standardize the infrastructure, use all that interest free money to invest and
create jobs and strengthen the EU has now somewhat popped up as an proposal by The Grüne.
They wanna create an european wide night train network, to minimize the use of planes which I think is great. Sure it would benefit Germany as the central country in Europe but imagine traveling from one major city to the other without all the check in shit at any airport and arriving at your destination the next morning.
He was also questioned tough stuff, and tried to beat aroudn the bush like these people do, but remained calm, didn't talk down to the kids or advocated that smoking isn't that bad.Anyone seen how Scholz' turn in the Pro7 Bundestagswahl-Show went? Didn't see it. I've only seen Laschet embarrassing himself again in the Wahlkampfarena on ARD.
He was also questioned tough stuff, and tried to beat aroudn the bush like these people do, but remained calm, didn't talk down to the kids or advocated that smoking isn't that bad.
Laschet got asked about Maaßen (who is close with literal Nazis), the Hambacher Forst and same sex marriage and Laschet lied, got stroppy and even said that smoking (which he does) isn't
Voting SPD means they have free choice. That's why i dont vote for them because they made the wrong choices in the past.
CDU will never work together with green so they'd be out if green is in.
Red green yellow or red green red is still better than red green black, black green blue.
So green party as constant does make the results better.
Totally agree
Oh yeah, something I'm a fan of and funny enough is something firends and I discussed a few year back is creating a better european train network
with bullet trains all over the continent only stopping at major cities to standardize the infrastructure, use all that interest free money to invest and
create jobs and strengthen the EU has now somewhat popped up as an proposal by The Grüne.
They wanna create an european wide night train network, to minimize the use of planes which I think is great. Sure it would benefit Germany as the central country in Europe but imagine traveling from one major city to the other without all the check in shit at any airport and arriving at your destination the next morning.
As i see it voting green will represent me best.I was planning on voting green, but I still fear the FDP pressuring them into Jamaica.
German media is a painfully under-investigated, corrupt, half-state, half company kind of affair. It's really messy over here with any kind of medium.Can anyone tell me why almost all of the big news outlets are Laschet/Union centric in their news reports? Like "Laschet bläst zum Angriff" "Kann Laschet noch aufholen?" "Laschet hat wieder gute Chancen". And Scholz gets only negative news reports like "Warum hat Scholz das gesagt?" "Scholzs Europa Plan ist für die Tonne" and so on. That's almost a manipulation of the voters. How can it be a fair Bundestagswahl if the media clearly wants Laschet/Union?
I was planning on voting green, but I still fear the FDP pressuring them into Jamaica.
All depends on the outlet. If it's something like FAZ, NZZ, anything from Springer you can bet your ass they wanna make look Laschet as good as possible. Heck you will even find some bullshit at Zeit, Spiegel and Tagesspiegel if you stumble across the right person. And I wouldn't call it manipulation. Biased for sure and implausible but manipulation... nahCan anyone tell me why almost all of the big news outlets are Laschet/Union centric in their news reports? Like "Laschet bläst zum Angriff" "Kann Laschet noch aufholen?" "Laschet hat wieder gute Chancen". And Scholz gets only negative news reports like "Warum hat Scholz das gesagt?" "Scholzs Europa Plan ist für die Tonne" and so on. That's almost a manipulation of the voters. How can it be a fair Bundestagswahl if the media clearly wants Laschet/Union?
Can anyone tell me why almost all of the big news outlets are Laschet/Union centric in their news reports? Like "Laschet bläst zum Angriff" "Kann Laschet noch aufholen?" "Laschet hat wieder gute Chancen". And Scholz gets only negative news reports like "Warum hat Scholz das gesagt?" "Scholzs Europa Plan ist für die Tonne" and so on. That's almost a manipulation of the voters. How can it be a fair Bundestagswahl if the media clearly wants Laschet/Union?
Oh yeah, something I'm a fan of and funny enough is something firends and I discussed a few year back is creating a better european train network
with bullet trains all over the continent only stopping at major cities to standardize the infrastructure, use all that interest free money to invest and
create jobs and strengthen the EU has now somewhat popped up as an proposal by The Grüne.
They wanna create an european wide night train network, to minimize the use of planes which I think is great. Sure it would benefit Germany as the central country in Europe but imagine traveling from one major city to the other without all the check in shit at any airport and arriving at your destination the next morning.
The Linke is VERY eager to tell anyone that their anti-NATO stance won't be a problem. During the coalition talks.
These are possible lines for rides that would take longer than 14h from start to finish or would only work during certain seasons.That dotted line between Ireland and the rest is doing a lot of presumption. There's no tunnel there, do they plan to build one or what?
Yeah i don't trust them at all.Linke has so many weird people in their ranks i doubt RRG would survive 4 years without the majority breaking down due to Linke MPs betraying the coalition.The Linke is VERY eager to tell anyone that their anti-NATO stance won't be a problem. During the coalition talks.
Der Verfassungsrechtler Joachim Wieland sieht das anders. Dem ARD-Hauptstadtstudio sagt er, die Behauptung der Staatsanwaltschaft in der Pressemitteilung sei vom Durchsuchungsbeschluss nicht gedeckt und insoweit rechtswidrig: "Weil Pressemitteilungen einer Behörde der Amtspflicht zur wahrheitsgemäßen Unterrichtung der Öffentlichkeit unterliegen, die vorliegend verletzt wurde."
Wenn die Staatsanwaltschaft untersuchen wolle, ob und gegebenenfalls inwieweit die Leitung sowie Verantwortliche im Ministerium sowie vorgesetzte Dienststellen in die Entscheidung der FIU eingebunden waren, dann "hätte sie bei dem zuständigen Richter einen entsprechenden Durchsuchungsbeschluss beantragen müssen. Der tatsächlich beantragte, vom Richter genehmigte Durchsuchungsbeschluss war aber auf die Identifizierung der beteiligten Mitarbeiter der FIU beschränkt und deckte eine Untersuchung gegen Verantwortliche im Finanzministerium nicht ab", sagt der Rechtswissenschaftler.
Und es gibt weitere Ungereimtheiten in Bezug auf den Durchsuchungsbeschluss. Davon gibt es zwei: einen für das Justizministerium und einen für das Bundesministerium der Finanzen. Dieser ist auf den 10. August datiert. Die Durchsuchung findet aber erst einen Monat später statt. Ein ungewöhnlich langer Zeitraum zwischen Beschluss und Durchsuchung, den die Staatsanwaltschaft mit einer Panne beim Amtsgericht erklärt. Dieses habe den Antrag für den Durchsuchungsbeschluss beim Justizministerium übersehen und nur den Beschluss für das Finanzministerium ausgefertigt. Erst am 23. August sei das aufgefallen. Am 25. August stellt das Amtsgericht Osnabrück auch einen Beschluss für das Justizministerium aus.
Für den Verfassungsrechtler Wieland ist das erstaunlich. Ein Durchsuchungsbeschluss sei per Definition eilbedürftig. "Den legt man sich ja nicht in den Schrank und wartet, bis man ihn wieder braucht." Das Amtsgericht stelle so einen Beschluss ja auch unter dem Eindruck einer bestimmten Situation aus. "Die kann sich ja vier Wochen später auch wieder geändert haben."
This whole thing is scummy as fuck and smells like CDU playing dirty with the prosecutor apparently being a CDU member and everything.regarding the FIU scandal
https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/btw21/scholz-vorwuerfe-finanzministerium-101.html
but at least CDU got their "razzia in scholz ministry" and "investigation against scholz state secretary" headlines, so who cares right?
Scholz has some dirty dealings going on surrounding Wirecard and CumEx, but this whole thing here look suspicious as fuckregarding the FIU scandal
https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/btw21/scholz-vorwuerfe-finanzministerium-101.html
but at least CDU got their "razzia in scholz ministry" and "investigation against scholz state secretary" headlines, so who cares right?
regarding the FIU scandal
https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/btw21/scholz-vorwuerfe-finanzministerium-101.html
but at least CDU got their "razzia in scholz ministry" and "investigation against scholz state secretary" headlines, so who cares right?
This whole thing is scummy as fuck and smells like CDU playing dirty with the prosecutor apparently being a CDU member and everything.
Can anyone tell me why almost all of the big news outlets are Laschet/Union centric in their news reports? Like "Laschet bläst zum Angriff" "Kann Laschet noch aufholen?" "Laschet hat wieder gute Chancen". And Scholz gets only negative news reports like "Warum hat Scholz das gesagt?" "Scholzs Europa Plan ist für die Tonne" and so on. That's almost a manipulation of the voters. How can it be a fair Bundestagswahl if the media clearly wants Laschet/Union?
If you want to follow the tweets of Binkowska they are something.
It's the same with the Wahlarena(Town Hall Meeting like event for candidates) from yesterday.
BILD, CDU and others are furious because some questions were asked by prepared "activists".
It's not like they asked new things: Hambacher Forst (primeval forest that was being protected by activists. Laschet illegally used police forces to vacate it) and the distance rules that prevent wind energy from being constructed are being talked about constantly.
Why is it of interest who is asking questions. That's not the problem, Laschet is having trouble because of the content of the questions.
lol, that has to be fake. Come on