It's madness that I've had better performance with PS Now than I do with remote play over the local network, but it is what it is!
How does people not utilizing something matter though? That doesn't change any of the qualities of the feature. You're essentially telling me something needs to be popular to matter... You started out saying it's not an alternative for those who don't own a handheld and I'm saying it is if it works on their network. I already pointed out it's not the same as dedicated hardware but I was never arguing that it's equal to a Switch or Vita.Being niche has to do with the fact that not as many people will know or bother to use it. Thus, you can't really put it on the same level of something like a Switch. Usefulness has nothing to do with it.
Was your laptop on 5 GHz?That is unbelievable and awesome.
So I guess somehow it works technically much better with a vita than a PC app
Sony was able to get it working because they bought Gaikai. Gaikai technology powers Remote Play and Share Play.Vita owners claimed it worked great for years. I always kinda doubted that but since I never wanted to buy a Vita there wasn't much way for me to refute it. It always just seemed to me that if such a thing were possible you would see many more companies attempting it.
I've been using it recently on pc with few issues, but it's noticeably a cheaper feeling streaming experience than say steam in home streaming
Like ps now, Sony's streaming tech was a horse quick out the gate that is starting to flag early in the race
That's because you can unlock Steam Streaming's bandwidth, giving you a much nicer quality stream.
Hell, looks like Sony only recently unlocked 1080p streaming for everyone. Before, those with older PS4s were stuck with 720p max.
I dont know what the res was, but this was playing rdr2 and it looked a lot greasier on the stream. That usual layer of vasaline on the display and what felt like a slower frame rate
This was on a new PS4 pro
The pro can stream 1080p60.
You can chose the res and fps in the clients.
I dont know what the res was, but this was playing rdr2 and it looked a lot greasier on the stream. That usual layer of vasaline on the display and what felt like a slower frame rate
This was on a new PS4 pro
The pro can stream 1080p60.
You can chose the res and fps in the clients.
That's because of the compression. Even at 1080p, it's going to look a bit messy, especially on games with a lot of high-frequency detail (like RDR2).
All PS4s can now, at least with remote play (idk about share play or twitch streaming).
They updated the client somewhat recently to allow it.
Is there any way to install the app on an Android that is not an Xperia?
No and that's the worst part of the whole thing actually.
I ended up buying an xperia phone (which btw I'm extremely happy with in other ways now) to do it.
But it should absolutely have open android and iphone apps.
I use the vita as a fourth controller when playing Towerfall Ascension with my mates and it works great locally for me.Remote Play is amazing when used through the internet. However, if you're actually at home on your PS4 you shouldn't use it because there's some input lag that is inherently part of it. There is no way to get rid of the tiny input lag even with the perfect connection, something to do with the chip inside the PS4.
When I play games a hundred kilometers away it's acceptable, because it doesn't seem to add any input lag to the experience. But locally it sucks.
I use the vita as a fourth controller when playing Towerfall Ascension with my mates and it works great locally for me.
So I guess somehow it works technically much better with a vita than a PC app
They do have 3rd party peripherals you can use to give it physical R2/L2 buttons which help.I played a few matches of Street Fighter V on the Vita and it worked well, I have the RT-AC68U.
But having to use the touch area on the back for L2/R2 is terrible. I wish it had little buttons like the New 3DS or the Switch.